Files
mercury/tests/purity/purity.m
Peter Wang 88047bbb45 Delete Erlang from tests.
tests/general/float_test.exp3:
tests/general/float_test.m:
tests/general/read_dir_regression.exp4:
tests/general/read_dir_regression.m:
tests/hard_coded/remove_file.exp2:
tests/hard_coded/remove_file.m:
    Delete Erlang backend specific expected outputs.

tests/hard_coded/Mmakefile:
tests/hard_coded/erlang_deconstruct.exp:
tests/hard_coded/erlang_deconstruct.m:
tests/hard_coded/existential_list.exp:
tests/hard_coded/existential_list.m:
tests/valid/Mmakefile:
tests/valid/erl_ite_vars.m:
tests/valid/zf_erlang_bug.m:
    Delete erlang target specific tests.

tests/*:
    Delete Erlang foreign procs and foreign types.
2020-10-27 11:10:11 +11:00

275 lines
6.6 KiB
Mathematica

%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% vim: ts=4 sw=4 et ft=mercury
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
% Various checks that impurity declarations are treated properly.
:- module purity.
:- interface.
:- import_module io.
:- impure pred main(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- implementation.
:- import_module int.
:- import_module list.
:- import_module string.
main -->
impure test1,
impure test2,
impure test3,
impure test4,
impure test1_inline,
impure test2_inline,
impure test3_inline,
impure test4_inline.
:- impure pred test1(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test2(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test3(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test4(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test1_inline(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test2_inline(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test3_inline(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred test4_inline(io__state::di, io__state::uo) is det.
:- impure pred set_x(int::in) is det.
:- pragma no_inline(set_x/1).
:- pragma foreign_proc("C",
set_x(X::in),
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
x = X;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("C#",
set_x(X::in),
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
x = X;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("Java",
set_x(X::in),
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
x = X;
").
:- impure pred incr_x is det.
:- pragma no_inline(incr_x/0).
:- pragma foreign_proc("C",
incr_x,
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
++x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("C#",
incr_x,
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
++x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("Java",
incr_x,
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
++x;
").
:- semipure pred get_x(int::out) is det.
:- pragma no_inline(get_x/1).
:- pragma foreign_proc("C",
get_x(X::out),
[will_not_call_mercury, promise_semipure],
"
X = x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("C#",
get_x(X::out),
[will_not_call_mercury, promise_semipure],
"
X = x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("Java",
get_x(X::out),
[will_not_call_mercury, promise_semipure],
"
X = x;
").
:- impure pred set_x_inline(int::in) is det.
:- pragma inline(set_x_inline/1).
:- pragma foreign_proc("C",
set_x_inline(X::in),
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
x = X;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("C#",
set_x_inline(X::in),
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
x = X;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("Java",
set_x_inline(X::in),
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
x = X;
").
:- impure pred incr_x_inline is det.
:- pragma inline(incr_x_inline/0).
:- pragma foreign_proc("C",
incr_x_inline,
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
++x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("C#",
incr_x_inline,
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
++x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("Java",
incr_x_inline,
[will_not_call_mercury],
"
++x;
").
:- semipure pred get_x_inline(int::out) is det.
:- pragma inline(get_x_inline/1).
:- pragma foreign_proc("C",
get_x_inline(X::out),
[will_not_call_mercury, promise_semipure],
"
X=x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("C#",
get_x_inline(X::out),
[will_not_call_mercury, promise_semipure],
"
X=x;
").
:- pragma foreign_proc("Java",
get_x_inline(X::out),
[will_not_call_mercury, promise_semipure],
"
X=x;
").
:- pragma foreign_decl("C", "extern int x;").
:- pragma foreign_code("C", "int x = 0;").
:- pragma foreign_code("C#", "static int x = 0;").
:- pragma foreign_code("Java", "static int x = 0;").
% tempt compiler to optimize away duplicate semipure goals.
test1 -->
{ semipure get_x(X) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(X)]),
{ impure set_x(X+1) },
{ semipure get_x(Y) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)]).
% tempt compiler to optimize away duplicate impure goals, or to compile away
% det goals with no outputs.
test2 -->
{ impure incr_x },
{ impure incr_x },
{ semipure get_x(Y) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)]).
% tempt compiler to optimize away impure goal in branch that cannot succeed.
test3 -->
( { impure incr_x },
{ fail }
; { semipure get_x(Y) }
),
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)]).
/***
% This test used to be written as follows, but currently
% the unique mode analysis is not smart enough to realize
% that the disjuncts which update the I/O state won't
% backtrack over I/O if the code is written like that.
% tempt compiler to optimize away impure goal in branch that cannot succeed.
test3 -->
( { impure incr_x },
{ fail }
; { semipure get_x(Y) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)])
).
***/
% regression test for problem with calls to implied modes of impure/semipure
% preds reporting spurious warnings about impurity markers in the wrong place.
test4 -->
{ semipure get_x(OldX) },
{ impure incr_x },
( { semipure get_x(OldX+1) } ->
io__write_string("test4 succeeds\n")
;
io__write_string("test4 fails\n")
),
{ impure set_x(OldX) }.
% Now do it all again with inlining requested
test1_inline -->
% Tempt compiler to optimize away duplicate semipure goals.
{ semipure get_x_inline(X) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(X)]),
{ impure set_x_inline(X+1) },
{ semipure get_x_inline(Y) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)]).
test2_inline -->
% Tempt compiler to optimize away duplicate impure goals,
% or to compile away det goals with no outputs.
{ impure incr_x_inline },
{ impure incr_x_inline },
{ semipure get_x_inline(Y) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)]).
test3_inline -->
% Tempt compiler to optimize away impure goal in branch that
% cannot succeed.
(
{ impure incr_x_inline },
{ fail }
;
{ semipure get_x_inline(Y) }
),
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)]).
/***
% This test used to be written as follows, but currently
% the unique mode analysis is not smart enough to realize
% that the disjuncts which update the I/O state won't
% backtrack over I/O if the code is written like that.
% tempt compiler to optimize away impure goal in branch that cannot succeed.
test3_inline -->
( { impure incr_x_inline },
{ fail }
; { semipure get_x_inline(Y) },
io__format("%d\n", [i(Y)])
).
***/
% regression test for problem with calls to implied modes of impure/semipure
% preds reporting spurious warnings about impurity markers in the wrong place.
test4_inline -->
{ semipure get_x_inline(OldX) },
{ impure incr_x_inline },
( { semipure get_x_inline(OldX+1) } ->
io__write_string("test4_inline succeeds\n")
;
io__write_string("test4_inline fails\n")
),
{ impure set_x_inline(OldX) }.