Files
mercury/compiler/typeclasses.m
Zoltan Somogyi b54ab42d70 A simple tool for performing substitutions on the source files of the
Estimated hours taken: 0.5
Branches: main

tools/subst:
	A simple tool for performing substitutions on the source files of the
	compiler.

compiler/*.m:
	Change the names of the get predicates operating on module_infos to
	include "get" in the name, for uniformity. This was done mostly by
	the following sed script, with some manual cleanup afterwards to reduce
	excessive line lengths.

s/module_info_types/module_info_get_type_table/
s/module_info_set_types/module_info_set_type_table/
s/module_info_insts/module_info_get_inst_table/
s/module_info_set_insts/module_info_set_inst_table/
s/module_info_modes/module_info_get_mode_table/
s/module_info_set_modes/module_info_set_mode_table/
s/module_info_ctors/module_info_get_cons_table/
s/module_info_set_ctors/module_info_set_cons_table/
s/module_info_classes/module_info_get_class_table/
s/module_info_set_classes/module_info_set_class_table/
s/module_info_instances/module_info_get_instance_table/
s/module_info_set_instances/module_info_set_instance_table/
s/module_info_superclasses/module_info_get_superclass_table/
s/module_info_set_superclasses/module_info_set_superclass_table/
s/module_info_assertion_table/module_info_get_assertion_table/
s/module_info_exclusive_table/module_info_get_exclusive_table/
s/module_info_ctor_field_table/module_info_get_ctor_field_table/
s/module_info_name/module_info_get_name/
s/module_info_globals/module_info_get_globals/
s/module_info_contains_foreign_types/module_info_get_contains_foreign_types/
s/module_info_num_errors/module_info_get_num_errors/
s/module_info_type_ctor_gen_infos/module_info_get_type_ctor_gen_infos/
s/module_info_stratified_preds/module_info_get_stratified_preds/
s/module_info_unused_arg_info/module_info_get_unused_arg_info/
s/module_info_exception_info/module_info_get_exception_info/
s/module_info_type_spec_info/module_info_get_type_spec_info/
s/module_info_no_tag_types/module_info_get_no_tag_types/
s/module_info_analysis_info/module_info_get_analysis_info/
s/module_info_aditi_top_down_procs/module_info_get_aditi_top_down_procs/
2005-09-30 08:08:49 +00:00

938 lines
36 KiB
Mathematica

%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% Copyright (C) 2005 The University of Melbourne.
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%
% File: typeclasses.m
% Main author: mark (including code by fjh and dgj)
%
% The module implements context reduction, which is the part of type checking
% which implements the type class system.
%
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- module check_hlds.typeclasses.
:- interface.
:- import_module check_hlds.typecheck_info.
:- import_module hlds.hlds_data.
:- import_module hlds.hlds_pred.
:- import_module parse_tree.prog_data.
:- import_module io.
% perform_context_reduction(OrigTypeAssignSet, Info0, Info) is true
% iff either
% (a) Info is the typecheck_info that results from performing
% context reduction on the type_assigns in Info0, or
% (b) if there is no valid context reduction, then Info is Info0
% with the type assign set replaced by OrigTypeAssignSet (see below).
%
% Context reduction is the process of eliminating redundant constraints
% from the constraints in the type_assign and adding the proof of the
% constraint's redundancy to the proofs in the same type_assign. There
% are three ways in which a constraint may be redundant:
%
% - if a constraint occurs in the pred/func declaration for this
% predicate or function, then it is redundant
% (in this case, the proof is trivial, so there is no need
% to record it in the proof map)
% - if a constraint is present in the set of constraints and all
% of the "superclass" constraints for the constraints are all
% present, then all the superclass constraints are eliminated
% - if there is an instance declaration that may be applied, the
% constraint is replaced by the constraints from that instance
% declaration
%
% In addition, context reduction removes repeated constraints.
%
% During context reduction we also try to "improve" the type binding
% in the given type_assign (that is, binding the type variables in
% such a way that the satisfiability of the constraints is not
% changed). This is done by applying improvement rules inside the
% fixpoint loop. The improvement rules are those which are induced
% by functional dependencies attached to typeclass declarations.
%
% If context reduction fails on a type_assign, that type_assign is
% removed from the type_assign_set. Context reduction fails if there is
% a constraint where the type of (at least) one of the arguments to
% the constraint has its top level functor bound, but there is no
% instance declaration for that type.
%
% If all type_assigns from the typecheck_info are rejected, than an
% appropriate error message is given, the type_assign_set is
% restored to the original one given by OrigTypeAssignSet,
% but without any typeclass constraints.
% The reason for this is to avoid reporting the same error at
% subsequent calls to perform_context_reduction.
%
:- pred perform_context_reduction(type_assign_set::in,
typecheck_info::in, typecheck_info::out, io::di, io::uo) is det.
% Apply context reduction to the list of class constraints by applying
% the instance rules or superclass rules, building up proofs for
% redundant constraints.
%
:- pred typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application(class_table::in,
instance_table::in, superclass_table::in, head_type_params::in,
tsubst::in, tsubst::out, tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
hlds_constraints::in, hlds_constraints::out) is det.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- implementation.
:- import_module check_hlds.type_util.
:- import_module check_hlds.typecheck_errors.
:- import_module hlds.hlds_module.
:- import_module parse_tree.prog_type.
:- import_module bool.
:- import_module int.
:- import_module list.
:- import_module map.
:- import_module multi_map.
:- import_module set.
:- import_module std_util.
:- import_module term.
:- import_module varset.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
perform_context_reduction(OrigTypeAssignSet, !Info, !IO) :-
checkpoint("before context reduction", !Info, !IO),
typecheck_info_get_module_info(!.Info, ModuleInfo),
module_info_get_class_table(ModuleInfo, ClassTable),
module_info_get_superclass_table(ModuleInfo, SuperClassTable),
module_info_get_instance_table(ModuleInfo, InstanceTable),
typecheck_info_get_type_assign_set(!.Info, TypeAssignSet0),
list__filter_map(
reduce_type_assign_context(ClassTable, SuperClassTable,
InstanceTable),
TypeAssignSet0, TypeAssignSet),
(
% Check that this context reduction hasn't eliminated
% all the type assignments.
TypeAssignSet = [],
TypeAssignSet0 \= []
->
report_unsatisfiable_constraints(TypeAssignSet0, !Info, !IO),
DeleteConstraints = (pred(TA0::in, TA::out) is det :-
type_assign_get_typeclass_constraints(TA0,
Constraints0),
Constraints = (Constraints0
^ unproven := [])
^ redundant := multi_map.init,
type_assign_set_typeclass_constraints(Constraints,
TA0, TA)
),
list__map(DeleteConstraints, OrigTypeAssignSet,
NewTypeAssignSet),
typecheck_info_set_type_assign_set(NewTypeAssignSet, !Info)
;
typecheck_info_set_type_assign_set(TypeAssignSet, !Info)
).
:- pred reduce_type_assign_context(class_table::in, superclass_table::in,
instance_table::in, type_assign::in, type_assign::out) is semidet.
reduce_type_assign_context(ClassTable, SuperClassTable, InstanceTable,
!TypeAssign) :-
type_assign_get_head_type_params(!.TypeAssign, HeadTypeParams),
type_assign_get_type_bindings(!.TypeAssign, Bindings0),
type_assign_get_typeclass_constraints(!.TypeAssign, Constraints0),
type_assign_get_typevarset(!.TypeAssign, TVarSet0),
type_assign_get_constraint_proofs(!.TypeAssign, Proofs0),
type_assign_get_constraint_map(!.TypeAssign, ConstraintMap0),
typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application(ClassTable,
InstanceTable, SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams,
Bindings0, Bindings, TVarSet0, TVarSet, Proofs0, Proofs,
ConstraintMap0, ConstraintMap, Constraints0, Constraints),
check_satisfiability(Constraints ^ unproven, HeadTypeParams),
type_assign_set_type_bindings(Bindings, !TypeAssign),
type_assign_set_typeclass_constraints(Constraints, !TypeAssign),
type_assign_set_typevarset(TVarSet, !TypeAssign),
type_assign_set_constraint_proofs(Proofs, !TypeAssign),
type_assign_set_constraint_map(ConstraintMap, !TypeAssign).
typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application(ClassTable, InstanceTable,
SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Constraints) :-
typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application_2(ClassTable,
InstanceTable, SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams, !Bindings,
!TVarSet, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap, !Constraints,
!.Constraints ^ unproven, _).
:- pred typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application_2(class_table::in,
instance_table::in, superclass_table::in, head_type_params::in,
tsubst::in, tsubst::out, tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
hlds_constraints::in, hlds_constraints::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out) is det.
typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application_2(ClassTable, InstanceTable,
SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Constraints, !Seen) :-
apply_rec_subst_to_constraints(!.Bindings, !Constraints),
apply_improvement_rules(ClassTable, InstanceTable, HeadTypeParams,
!.Constraints, !TVarSet, !Bindings, AppliedImprovementRule),
% We want to make sure that any changes to the bindings are
% reflected in the constraints, so that the full effect of the
% improvement rules applies as soon as possible. We therefore
% apply the bindings to the constraints (but only if the
% bindings have actually changed since they were last applied).
%
(
AppliedImprovementRule = yes,
apply_rec_subst_to_constraints(!.Bindings, !Constraints)
;
AppliedImprovementRule = no
),
eliminate_assumed_constraints(!ConstraintMap, !Constraints,
EliminatedAssumed),
apply_instance_rules(ClassTable, InstanceTable, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Seen, !Constraints, AppliedInstanceRule),
% XXX kind inference:
% We assume that all tvars have kind `star'.
map__init(KindMap),
apply_class_rules(SuperClassTable, !.TVarSet, KindMap, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Constraints, AppliedClassRule),
(
AppliedImprovementRule = no,
EliminatedAssumed = no,
AppliedInstanceRule = no,
AppliedClassRule = no
->
% We have reached fixpoint.
%
sort_and_merge_dups(!Constraints)
;
typeclasses__reduce_context_by_rule_application_2(ClassTable,
InstanceTable, SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings, !TVarSet, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap,
!Constraints, !Seen)
).
:- pred sort_and_merge_dups(hlds_constraints::in, hlds_constraints::out)
is det.
sort_and_merge_dups(!Constraints) :-
% Should we also sort and merge the other fields?
Unproven0 = !.Constraints ^ unproven,
list__sort(compare_hlds_constraints, Unproven0, Unproven1),
merge_adjacent_constraints(Unproven1, Unproven),
!:Constraints = !.Constraints ^ unproven := Unproven.
:- pred merge_adjacent_constraints(list(hlds_constraint)::in,
list(hlds_constraint)::out) is det.
merge_adjacent_constraints([], []).
merge_adjacent_constraints([C | Cs], Constraints) :-
merge_adjacent_constraints_2(C, Cs, Constraints).
:- pred merge_adjacent_constraints_2(hlds_constraint::in,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out) is det.
merge_adjacent_constraints_2(C0, [], [C0]).
merge_adjacent_constraints_2(C0, [C1 | Cs], Constraints) :-
(
merge_constraints(C0, C1, C)
->
merge_adjacent_constraints_2(C, Cs, Constraints)
;
merge_adjacent_constraints_2(C1, Cs, Constraints0),
Constraints = [C0 | Constraints0]
).
% merge_constraints(A, B, C) succeeds if A and B represent equivalent
% constraints. In this case, C is the equivalent constraint with the
% list of ids being the union of the ids of A and B.
%
:- pred merge_constraints(hlds_constraint::in, hlds_constraint::in,
hlds_constraint::out) is semidet.
merge_constraints(constraint(IdsA, Name, Types), constraint(IdsB, Name, Types),
constraint(Ids, Name, Types)) :-
list__append(IdsA, IdsB, Ids0),
list__sort_and_remove_dups(Ids0, Ids).
:- pred apply_improvement_rules(class_table::in, instance_table::in,
head_type_params::in, hlds_constraints::in, tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::out) is det.
apply_improvement_rules(ClassTable, InstanceTable, HeadTypeParams, Constraints,
!TVarSet, !Bindings, Changed) :-
% XXX should we sort and merge the constraints here?
do_class_improvement(ClassTable, HeadTypeParams, Constraints,
!Bindings, Changed1),
% XXX do we really need to modify the varset? See the comment above
% find_matching_instance_rule.
do_instance_improvement(ClassTable, InstanceTable, HeadTypeParams,
Constraints, !TVarSet, !Bindings, Changed2),
Changed = bool__or(Changed1, Changed2).
:- pred do_class_improvement(class_table::in, head_type_params::in,
hlds_constraints::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::out) is det.
do_class_improvement(ClassTable, HeadTypeParams, Constraints, !Bindings,
Changed) :-
Redundant = Constraints ^ redundant,
Assumed = Constraints ^ assumed,
multi_map__keys(Redundant, ClassIds),
list__foldl2(
do_class_improvement_2(ClassTable, HeadTypeParams, Redundant,
Assumed),
ClassIds, !Bindings, no, Changed).
:- pred do_class_improvement_2(class_table::in, head_type_params::in,
redundant_constraints::in, list(hlds_constraint)::in, class_id::in,
tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_class_improvement_2(ClassTable, HeadTypeParams, RedundantConstraints,
Assumed, ClassId, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
map__lookup(ClassTable, ClassId, ClassDefn),
FunDeps = ClassDefn ^ class_fundeps,
map__lookup(RedundantConstraints, ClassId, Constraints),
do_class_improvement_by_pairs(Constraints, FunDeps, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings, !Changed),
list__filter(has_class_id(ClassId), Assumed, ThisClassAssumed),
do_class_improvement_by_assumed(ThisClassAssumed, Constraints, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed).
:- pred has_class_id(class_id::in, hlds_constraint::in) is semidet.
has_class_id(class_id(Name, Arity), constraint(_, Name, Args)) :-
list__length(Args, Arity).
% Try to find an opportunity for improvement for each (unordered)
% pair of constraints from the list.
%
:- pred do_class_improvement_by_pairs(list(hlds_constraint)::in,
hlds_class_fundeps::in, head_type_params::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_class_improvement_by_pairs([], _, _, !Bindings, !Changed).
do_class_improvement_by_pairs([Constraint | Constraints], FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
do_class_improvement_by_pairs_2(Constraint, Constraints, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed),
do_class_improvement_by_pairs(Constraints, FunDeps, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings, !Changed).
:- pred do_class_improvement_by_pairs_2(hlds_constraint::in,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, hlds_class_fundeps::in,
head_type_params::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::in, bool::out)
is det.
do_class_improvement_by_pairs_2(_, [], _, _, !Bindings, !Changed).
do_class_improvement_by_pairs_2(Constraint, [HeadConstraint | TailConstraints],
FunDeps, HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
do_class_improvement_pair(Constraint, HeadConstraint, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed),
do_class_improvement_by_pairs_2(Constraint, TailConstraints, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed).
% Try to find an opportunity for improvement for each pair of
% constraints where one comes from the assumed constraints and the
% other comes from the redundant constraints.
%
:- pred do_class_improvement_by_assumed(list(hlds_constraint)::in,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, hlds_class_fundeps::in,
head_type_params::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::in, bool::out)
is det.
do_class_improvement_by_assumed(Assumed, Constraints, FunDeps, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings, !Changed) :-
list__foldl2(
do_class_improvement_by_assumed_2(Constraints, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams),
Assumed, !Bindings, !Changed).
:- pred do_class_improvement_by_assumed_2(list(hlds_constraint)::in,
hlds_class_fundeps::in, head_type_params::in, hlds_constraint::in,
tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_class_improvement_by_assumed_2([], _, _, _, !Bindings, !Changed).
do_class_improvement_by_assumed_2([Constraint | Constraints], FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, Assumed, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
do_class_improvement_pair(Constraint, Assumed, FunDeps, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings, !Changed),
do_class_improvement_by_assumed_2(Constraints, FunDeps, HeadTypeParams,
Assumed, !Bindings, !Changed).
% Try to find an opportunity for improvement for this pair of
% constraints, using each fundep in turn.
%
:- pred do_class_improvement_pair(hlds_constraint::in, hlds_constraint::in,
hlds_class_fundeps::in, head_type_params::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_class_improvement_pair(_, _, [], _, !Bindings, !Changed).
do_class_improvement_pair(ConstraintA, ConstraintB, [FunDep | FunDeps],
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
do_class_improvement_fundep(ConstraintA, ConstraintB, FunDep,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed),
do_class_improvement_pair(ConstraintA, ConstraintB, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings, !Changed).
:- pred do_class_improvement_fundep(hlds_constraint::in, hlds_constraint::in,
hlds_class_fundep::in, head_type_params::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_class_improvement_fundep(ConstraintA, ConstraintB, FunDep, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings, !Changed) :-
ConstraintA = constraint(_, _, TypesA),
ConstraintB = constraint(_, _, TypesB),
FunDep = fundep(Domain, Range),
(
%
% We already know that the name/arity of the
% constraints match, since we have partitioned them
% already.
%
lists_match_on_elements(Domain, TypesA, TypesB),
\+ lists_match_on_elements(Range, TypesA, TypesB),
%
% The unification can fail if type parameters in the
% declaration would be bound by the improvement rule.
% This means that the declaration is not as specific
% as it could be, but that is not a problem for us.
%
unify_on_elements(Range, TypesA, TypesB, HeadTypeParams,
!Bindings)
->
!:Changed = yes
;
true
).
:- pred do_instance_improvement(class_table::in, instance_table::in,
head_type_params::in, hlds_constraints::in, tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
tsubst::in, tsubst::out, bool::out) is det.
do_instance_improvement(ClassTable, InstanceTable, HeadTypeParams, Constraints,
!TVarSet, !Bindings, Changed) :-
RedundantConstraints = Constraints ^ redundant,
map__keys(RedundantConstraints, ClassIds),
list__foldl3(
do_instance_improvement_2(ClassTable, InstanceTable,
HeadTypeParams, RedundantConstraints),
ClassIds, !TVarSet, !Bindings, no, Changed).
:- pred do_instance_improvement_2(class_table::in, instance_table::in,
head_type_params::in, redundant_constraints::in, class_id::in,
tvarset::in, tvarset::out, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_instance_improvement_2(ClassTable, InstanceTable, HeadTypeParams,
RedundantConstraints, ClassId, !TVarSet, !Bindings,
!Changed) :-
map__lookup(ClassTable, ClassId, ClassDefn),
FunDeps = ClassDefn ^ class_fundeps,
map__lookup(InstanceTable, ClassId, InstanceDefns),
map__lookup(RedundantConstraints, ClassId, Constraints),
list__foldl3(
do_instance_improvement_3(Constraints, FunDeps,
HeadTypeParams),
InstanceDefns, !TVarSet, !Bindings, !Changed).
:- pred do_instance_improvement_3(list(hlds_constraint)::in,
hlds_class_fundeps::in, head_type_params::in, hlds_instance_defn::in,
tvarset::in, tvarset::out, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_instance_improvement_3(Constraints, FunDeps, HeadTypeParams, InstanceDefn,
!TVarSet, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
InstanceTVarSet = InstanceDefn ^ instance_tvarset,
InstanceTypes0 = InstanceDefn ^ instance_types,
tvarset_merge_renaming(!.TVarSet, InstanceTVarSet, NewTVarSet,
Renaming),
apply_variable_renaming_to_type_list(Renaming, InstanceTypes0,
InstanceTypes),
list__foldl2(
do_instance_improvement_4(FunDeps, InstanceTypes,
HeadTypeParams),
Constraints, !Bindings, no, Changed0),
(
Changed0 = yes,
!:TVarSet = NewTVarSet,
!:Changed = yes
;
Changed0 = no
).
:- pred do_instance_improvement_4(hlds_class_fundeps::in, list(type)::in,
head_type_params::in, hlds_constraint::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_instance_improvement_4(FunDeps, InstanceTypes, HeadTypeParams, Constraint,
!Bindings, !Changed) :-
list__foldl2(
do_instance_improvement_fundep(Constraint, InstanceTypes,
HeadTypeParams),
FunDeps, !Bindings, !Changed).
:- pred do_instance_improvement_fundep(hlds_constraint::in, list(type)::in,
head_type_params::in, hlds_class_fundep::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out,
bool::in, bool::out) is det.
do_instance_improvement_fundep(Constraint, InstanceTypes0, HeadTypeParams,
FunDep, !Bindings, !Changed) :-
Constraint = constraint(_, _, ConstraintTypes),
FunDep = fundep(Domain, Range),
(
%
% We already know that the name/arity of the
% constraints match, since we have partitioned them
% already.
%
subsumes_on_elements(Domain, InstanceTypes0, ConstraintTypes,
Subst),
apply_rec_subst_to_type_list(Subst, InstanceTypes0,
InstanceTypes),
\+ lists_match_on_elements(Range, InstanceTypes,
ConstraintTypes),
%
% The unification can fail if type parameters in the
% declaration would be bound by the improvement rule.
% This means that the declaration is not as specific
% as it could be, but that is not a problem for us.
%
unify_on_elements(Range, InstanceTypes, ConstraintTypes,
HeadTypeParams, !Bindings)
->
!:Changed = yes
;
true
).
% For each index in the set, check that the types in the corresponding
% positions in the lists are identical.
%
:- pred lists_match_on_elements(set(hlds_class_argpos)::in, list(type)::in,
list(type)::in) is semidet.
lists_match_on_elements(Elements, TypesA, TypesB) :-
RTypesA = restrict_list_elements(Elements, TypesA),
RTypesB = restrict_list_elements(Elements, TypesB),
RTypesA = RTypesB.
% For each index in the set, unify the types in the corresponding
% positions in the lists and add to the current bindings.
%
:- pred unify_on_elements(set(hlds_class_argpos)::in, list(type)::in,
list(type)::in, head_type_params::in, tsubst::in, tsubst::out)
is semidet.
unify_on_elements(Elements, TypesA, TypesB, HeadTypeParams, !Bindings) :-
RTypesA = restrict_list_elements(Elements, TypesA),
RTypesB = restrict_list_elements(Elements, TypesB),
type_unify_list(RTypesA, RTypesB, HeadTypeParams, !Bindings).
% Analogous to type_list_subsumes except that it only checks those
% elements of the list specified by the set of indices.
%
:- pred subsumes_on_elements(set(hlds_class_argpos)::in, list(type)::in,
list(type)::in, tsubst::out) is semidet.
subsumes_on_elements(Elements, TypesA, TypesB, Subst) :-
RTypesA = restrict_list_elements(Elements, TypesA),
RTypesB = restrict_list_elements(Elements, TypesB),
prog_type__vars_list(RTypesB, RTypesBVars),
map__init(Subst0),
type_unify_list(RTypesA, RTypesB, RTypesBVars, Subst0, Subst).
:- pred eliminate_assumed_constraints(constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
hlds_constraints::in, hlds_constraints::out, bool::out) is det.
eliminate_assumed_constraints(!ConstraintMap, !Constraints, Changed) :-
!.Constraints = constraints(Unproven0, Assumed, Redundant),
eliminate_assumed_constraints_2(Assumed, !ConstraintMap,
Unproven0, Unproven, Changed),
!:Constraints = constraints(Unproven, Assumed, Redundant).
:- pred eliminate_assumed_constraints_2(list(hlds_constraint)::in,
constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out,
bool::out) is det.
eliminate_assumed_constraints_2(_, !ConstraintMap, [], [], no).
eliminate_assumed_constraints_2(AssumedCs, !ConstraintMap, [C | Cs], NewCs,
Changed) :-
eliminate_assumed_constraints_2(AssumedCs, !ConstraintMap, Cs, NewCs0,
Changed0),
(
some [A] (
list__member(A, AssumedCs),
matching_constraints(A, C)
)
->
update_constraint_map(C, !ConstraintMap),
NewCs = NewCs0,
Changed = yes
;
NewCs = [C | NewCs0],
Changed = Changed0
).
:- pred apply_instance_rules(class_table::in, instance_table::in,
tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out,
hlds_constraints::in, hlds_constraints::out, bool::out) is det.
apply_instance_rules(ClassTable, InstanceTable, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Seen, !Constraints, Changed) :-
!.Constraints = constraints(Unproven0, Assumed, Redundant0),
apply_instance_rules_2(ClassTable, InstanceTable, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, Redundant0, Redundant, !Seen,
Unproven0, Unproven, Changed),
!:Constraints = constraints(Unproven, Assumed, Redundant).
:- pred apply_instance_rules_2(class_table::in, instance_table::in,
tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
redundant_constraints::in, redundant_constraints::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out, bool::out)
is det.
apply_instance_rules_2(_, _, !TVarSet, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap, !Redundant,
!Seen, [], [], no).
apply_instance_rules_2(ClassTable, InstanceTable, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Redundant, !Seen, [C | Cs], Constraints,
Changed) :-
C = constraint(_, ClassName, Types),
list__length(Types, Arity),
map__lookup(InstanceTable, class_id(ClassName, Arity), Instances),
InitialTVarSet = !.TVarSet,
(
find_matching_instance_rule(Instances, C, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
NewConstraints0)
->
update_constraint_map(C, !ConstraintMap),
% Remove any constraints we've already seen.
% This ensures we don't get into an infinite loop.
list__filter(matches_no_constraint(!.Seen), NewConstraints0,
NewConstraints),
update_redundant_constraints(ClassTable, !.TVarSet,
NewConstraints, !Redundant),
% Put the new constraints at the front of the list
!:Seen = NewConstraints ++ !.Seen,
Changed1 = yes
;
% Put the old constraint at the front of the list
NewConstraints = [C],
!:TVarSet = InitialTVarSet,
Changed1 = no
),
apply_instance_rules_2(ClassTable, InstanceTable, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
!ConstraintMap, !Redundant, !Seen, Cs, TailConstraints,
Changed2),
bool__or(Changed1, Changed2, Changed),
list__append(NewConstraints, TailConstraints, Constraints).
:- pred matches_no_constraint(list(hlds_constraint)::in, hlds_constraint::in)
is semidet.
matches_no_constraint(Seen, Constraint) :-
\+ (some [S] (
list__member(S, Seen),
matching_constraints(S, Constraint)
)).
% We take the first matching instance rule that we can find; any
% overlapping instance declarations will have been caught earlier.
%
% This pred also catches tautological constraints since the
% NewConstraints will be [].
%
% XXX Surely we shouldn't need to rename the variables and return
% a new varset: this substitution should have been worked out before,
% as these varsets would already have been merged.
%
:- pred find_matching_instance_rule(list(hlds_instance_defn)::in,
hlds_constraint::in, tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::out) is semidet.
find_matching_instance_rule(Instances, Constraint, !TVarSet, !Proofs,
NewConstraints) :-
% Start a counter so we remember which instance decl we have used.
find_matching_instance_rule_2(Instances, 1, Constraint, !TVarSet,
!Proofs, NewConstraints).
:- pred find_matching_instance_rule_2(list(hlds_instance_defn)::in, int::in,
hlds_constraint::in, tvarset::in, tvarset::out,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::out) is semidet.
find_matching_instance_rule_2([Instance | Instances], InstanceNum0, Constraint,
!TVarSet, !Proofs, NewConstraints) :-
Constraint = constraint(_Ids, _Name, Types),
ProgConstraints0 = Instance ^ instance_constraints,
InstanceTypes0 = Instance ^ instance_types,
InstanceTVarSet = Instance ^ instance_tvarset,
tvarset_merge_renaming(!.TVarSet, InstanceTVarSet, NewTVarSet,
Renaming),
apply_variable_renaming_to_type_list(Renaming, InstanceTypes0,
InstanceTypes),
(
type_list_subsumes(InstanceTypes, Types, Subst)
->
!:TVarSet = NewTVarSet,
apply_variable_renaming_to_prog_constraint_list(Renaming,
ProgConstraints0, ProgConstraints1),
apply_rec_subst_to_prog_constraint_list(Subst,
ProgConstraints1, ProgConstraints),
init_hlds_constraint_list(ProgConstraints, NewConstraints),
NewProof = apply_instance(InstanceNum0),
retrieve_prog_constraint(Constraint, ProgConstraint),
map__set(!.Proofs, ProgConstraint, NewProof, !:Proofs)
;
InstanceNum = InstanceNum0 + 1,
find_matching_instance_rule_2(Instances, InstanceNum,
Constraint, !TVarSet, !Proofs, NewConstraints)
).
% To reduce a constraint using class declarations, we search the
% superclass relation to find a path from the inferred constraint to
% another (declared or inferred) constraint.
%
:- pred apply_class_rules(superclass_table::in, tvarset::in, tvar_kind_map::in,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out,
constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
hlds_constraints::in, hlds_constraints::out, bool::out) is det.
apply_class_rules(SuperClassTable, TVarSet, KindMap, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap,
!Constraints, Changed) :-
!.Constraints = constraints(Unproven0, Assumed, _),
apply_class_rules_2(Assumed, SuperClassTable, TVarSet, KindMap,
!Proofs, !ConstraintMap, Unproven0, Unproven, Changed),
!:Constraints = !.Constraints ^ unproven := Unproven.
:- pred apply_class_rules_2(list(hlds_constraint)::in, superclass_table::in,
tvarset::in, tvar_kind_map::in, constraint_proof_map::in,
constraint_proof_map::out, constraint_map::in, constraint_map::out,
list(hlds_constraint)::in, list(hlds_constraint)::out,
bool::out) is det.
apply_class_rules_2(_, _, _, _, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap, [], [], no).
apply_class_rules_2(AssumedConstraints, SuperClassTable, TVarSet, KindMap,
!Proofs, !ConstraintMap, [Constraint0 | Constraints0],
Constraints, Changed) :-
Parents = [],
retrieve_prog_constraint(Constraint0, ProgConstraint0),
% The head_type_params argument contains all the variables from
% the original constraint that we are trying to prove. (These
% are the type variables that must not be bound as we search
% through the superclass relation).
%
constraint_get_tvars(ProgConstraint0, HeadTypeParams),
(
eliminate_constraint_by_class_rules(ProgConstraint0, _, _,
AssumedConstraints, SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams,
TVarSet, KindMap, Parents, !Proofs)
->
update_constraint_map(Constraint0, !ConstraintMap),
apply_class_rules_2(AssumedConstraints, SuperClassTable,
TVarSet, KindMap, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap,
Constraints0, Constraints, _),
Changed = yes
;
apply_class_rules_2(AssumedConstraints, SuperClassTable,
TVarSet, KindMap, !Proofs, !ConstraintMap,
Constraints0, TailConstraints, Changed),
Constraints = [Constraint0 | TailConstraints]
).
% eliminate_constraint_by_class_rules eliminates a class constraint
% by applying the superclass relation. A list of "parent" constraints
% is also passed in --- these are the constraints that we are
% (recursively) in the process of checking, and is used to ensure that
% we don't get into a cycle in the relation.
%
:- pred eliminate_constraint_by_class_rules(prog_constraint::in,
prog_constraint::out, tsubst::out, list(hlds_constraint)::in,
superclass_table::in, head_type_params::in, tvarset::in,
tvar_kind_map::in, list(prog_constraint)::in,
constraint_proof_map::in, constraint_proof_map::out) is semidet.
eliminate_constraint_by_class_rules(C, SubstC, SubClassSubst,
AssumedConstraints, SuperClassTable, HeadTypeParams, TVarSet,
KindMap, ParentConstraints, Proofs0, Proofs) :-
% Make sure we aren't in a cycle in the
% superclass relation
\+ list__member(C, ParentConstraints),
C = constraint(SuperClassName, SuperClassTypes),
list__length(SuperClassTypes, SuperClassArity),
SuperClassId = class_id(SuperClassName, SuperClassArity),
multi_map__search(SuperClassTable, SuperClassId, SubClasses),
% Convert all the subclass_details into prog_constraints by
% doing the appropriate variable renaming and applying the
% type variable bindings.
% If the unification of the type variables for a particular
% constraint fails then that constraint is eliminated because it
% cannot contribute to proving the constraint we are trying to
% prove.
list__filter_map(
subclass_details_to_constraint(TVarSet, KindMap,
SuperClassTypes),
SubClasses, SubClassConstraints),
(
% Do the first level of search. We search for
% an assumed constraint which unifies with any
% of the subclass constraints.
varset__vars(TVarSet, XXXHeadTypeParams),
list.find_first_map(
match_assumed_constraint(XXXHeadTypeParams,
SubClassConstraints),
AssumedConstraints, SubClass - SubClassSubst0)
->
SubClassSubst = SubClassSubst0,
apply_rec_subst_to_prog_constraint(SubClassSubst, C, SubstC),
map__set(Proofs0, SubstC, superclass(SubClass), Proofs)
;
NewParentConstraints = [C | ParentConstraints],
% Recursively search the rest of the superclass
% relation.
SubClassSearch = (pred(Constraint::in, CnstrtAndProof::out)
is semidet :-
eliminate_constraint_by_class_rules(Constraint,
SubstConstraint, SubClassSubst0,
AssumedConstraints, SuperClassTable,
HeadTypeParams, TVarSet, KindMap,
NewParentConstraints, Proofs0, SubProofs),
CnstrtAndProof = {SubstConstraint, SubClassSubst0,
SubProofs}
),
% XXX this could (and should) be more efficient.
% (i.e. by manually doing a "cut").
find_first_map(SubClassSearch, SubClassConstraints,
{NewSubClass, SubClassSubst, NewProofs}),
apply_rec_subst_to_prog_constraint(SubClassSubst, C, SubstC),
map__set(NewProofs, SubstC, superclass(NewSubClass), Proofs)
).
:- pred match_assumed_constraint(head_type_params::in,
list(prog_constraint)::in, hlds_constraint::in,
pair(prog_constraint, tsubst)::out) is semidet.
match_assumed_constraint(HeadTypeParams, SubClassConstraints,
AssumedConstraint, Match) :-
find_first_map(
match_assumed_constraint_2(HeadTypeParams, AssumedConstraint),
SubClassConstraints, Match).
:- pred match_assumed_constraint_2(head_type_params::in, hlds_constraint::in,
prog_constraint::in, pair(prog_constraint, tsubst)::out) is semidet.
match_assumed_constraint_2(HeadTypeParams, AssumedConstraint,
SubClassConstraint, Match) :-
AssumedConstraint = constraint(_, AssumedConstraintClass,
AssumedConstraintTypes),
SubClassConstraint = constraint(AssumedConstraintClass,
SubClassConstraintTypes),
map__init(EmptySub),
type_unify_list(SubClassConstraintTypes, AssumedConstraintTypes,
HeadTypeParams, EmptySub, AssumedConstraintSub),
retrieve_prog_constraint(AssumedConstraint, MatchingProgConstraint),
Match = MatchingProgConstraint - AssumedConstraintSub.
% subclass_details_to_constraint will fail iff the call to
% type_unify_list fails.
%
:- pred subclass_details_to_constraint(tvarset::in, tvar_kind_map::in,
list(type)::in, subclass_details::in, prog_constraint::out) is semidet.
subclass_details_to_constraint(TVarSet, KindMap0, SuperClassTypes,
SubClassDetails, SubC) :-
SubClassDetails = subclass_details(SuperVars0, SubID, SubVars0,
SuperVarSet),
% Rename the variables from the typeclass
% declaration into those of the current pred.
tvarset_merge_renaming(TVarSet, SuperVarSet, _NewTVarSet, Renaming),
apply_variable_renaming_to_tvar_kind_map(Renaming, KindMap0, KindMap),
apply_variable_renaming_to_tvar_list(Renaming, SubVars0, SubVars),
apply_variable_renaming_to_type_list(Renaming, SuperVars0, SuperVars),
% Work out what the (renamed) vars from the
% typeclass declaration are bound to here.
type_unify_list(SuperVars, SuperClassTypes, [], map__init, Bindings),
SubID = class_id(SubName, _SubArity),
apply_rec_subst_to_tvar_list(KindMap, Bindings, SubVars,
SubClassTypes),
SubC = constraint(SubName, SubClassTypes).
% check_satisfiability(Constraints, HeadTypeParams):
% Check that all of the constraints are satisfiable.
% Fail if any are definitely not satisfiable.
%
% We disallow ground constraints
% for which there are no matching instance rules,
% even though the module system means that it would
% make sense to allow them: even if there
% is no instance declaration visible in the current
% module, there may be one visible in the caller.
% The reason we disallow them is that in practice
% allowing this causes type inference to let too
% many errors slip through, with the error diagnosis
% being too far removed from the real cause of the
% error. Note that ground constraints *are* allowed
% if you declare them, since we removed declared
% constraints before checking satisfiability.
%
% Similarly, for constraints on head type params
% (universally quantified type vars in this pred's type decl,
% or existentially quantified type vars in type decls for
% callees), we know that the head type params can never get bound.
% This means that if the constraint wasn't an assumed constraint
% and can't be eliminated by instance rule or class rule
% application, then we can report an error now, rather than
% later. (For non-head-type-param type variables,
% we need to wait, in case the type variable gets bound
% to a type for which there is a valid instance declaration.)
%
% So a constraint is considered satisfiable iff it
% contains at least one type variable that is not in the
% head type params.
%
:- pred check_satisfiability(list(hlds_constraint)::in, head_type_params::in)
is semidet.
check_satisfiability(Constraints, HeadTypeParams) :-
all [Constraint] (
list__member(Constraint, Constraints)
=>
(
Constraint = constraint(_Ids, _ClassName, Types),
type_list_contains_var(Types, TVar),
not list__member(TVar, HeadTypeParams)
)
).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- end_module check_hlds.typeclasses.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%