mirror of
https://github.com/Mercury-Language/mercury.git
synced 2025-12-21 00:39:37 +00:00
Estimated hours taken: 7 Branches: main Improve the declarative debugger interface. The two main changes are to use the mdb help system and not re-display the question after the user issues a command which does not answer the question. For example if the user issues an `info' command, then previously the question would be redisplayed after the requested information and if the question is big then the information would be scrolled off the screen. browser/declarative_analyser.m: Remove extra new line characters when printing info. These are no longer necessary since the question is not redisplayed. browser/declarative_debugger.m: Pass the help system from mdb to the oracle state when initialising the diagnoser. browser/declarative_oracle.m: Pass the help system to the user state when initialising the oracle state. browser/declarative_user.m: Add two new fields to the user state: one to keep a reference to the help system and one to indicate whether the current question should be displayed when getting a user input. Allow the user to redisplay the question by issuing a `print' command with no arguments. If the question is not to be displayed the show a "dd>" prompt. Change the `abort' command to `quit'. This is more consistent with the rest of mdb. doc/commands: Add a script to print all the commands in a section in the user guide. doc/generate_mdb_doc: Generate help for the declarative debugger. doc/mdb_categories: Add a category, `decl', for commands that can be executed inside the declarative debugger. Change the `dd' category to mdb_dd, because 1) `help dd' used to show help about the `dd' category AND the `dd' command and 2) `dd' is too general a category name now that we have a `decl' category. Add an item, `decl_debug' to the concepts category. doc/user_guide.texi: Document some dd commands which previously weren't documented here. Add a short overview of the declarative debugger. This is displayed when the user issues a `help' command from within the dd. Move the bit about the behaviour when no command is given to before the list of commands. This is necessary so util/info_to_mdb.c doesn't include this in the help of the last command in the list. tests/debugger/declarative/app.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/app.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/browse_arg.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/browse_arg.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/browser_mode.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/browser_mode.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/confirm_abort.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/confirm_abort.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/dependency.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/dependency.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/find_origin.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/find_origin.exp2: tests/debugger/declarative/info.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/info.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/io_stream_test.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/io_stream_test.exp2: tests/debugger/declarative/mapinit.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/mapinit.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/output_term_dep.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/output_term_dep.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/resume.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/resume.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/skip.exp: tests/debugger/declarative/skip.inp: tests/debugger/declarative/solutions.exp3: tests/debugger/declarative/tabled_read_decl.exp: Update tests. trace/mercury_trace_declarative.c: trace/mercury_trace_help.c: trace/mercury_trace_help.h: Pass the help system to the frontend.
1293 lines
41 KiB
Mathematica
1293 lines
41 KiB
Mathematica
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Copyright (C) 1999-2005 The University of Melbourne.
|
|
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU Library General
|
|
% Public License - see the file COPYING.LIB in the Mercury distribution.
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% File: declarative_analyser.m
|
|
% Authors: Mark Brown, Ian MacLarty
|
|
%
|
|
% This module implements some analysis algorithms that search for bugs in
|
|
% Evaluation Dependency Trees (EDTs). The search algorithms use information
|
|
% provided by the search_space data type which acts as a layer on top of the
|
|
% EDT, storing information relevant to the bug search. Throughout this module
|
|
% the type variables T and S refer to the types of nodes in the EDT and the
|
|
% store of EDT nodes respectively.
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
:- module mdb.declarative_analyser.
|
|
|
|
:- interface.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module mdb.declarative_debugger.
|
|
:- import_module mdb.io_action.
|
|
:- import_module mdb.declarative_edt.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module std_util, io.
|
|
|
|
:- type analyser_response(T)
|
|
|
|
% There are no suspects left, and no incorrect
|
|
% nodes have been found.
|
|
---> no_suspects
|
|
|
|
% A suspect who is guilty, along with the evidence
|
|
% against the suspect.
|
|
; bug_found(decl_bug, decl_evidence(T))
|
|
|
|
% The analyser desires an answer to the question.
|
|
; oracle_question(decl_question(T))
|
|
|
|
% The analyser requires the given implicit sub-tree
|
|
% to be made explicit.
|
|
; require_explicit_subtree(T)
|
|
|
|
% The analyser requires an explicit tree above the
|
|
% root of an existing explicit tree.
|
|
; require_explicit_supertree(T)
|
|
|
|
% The analyser would like the oracle to re-ask the user
|
|
% this question and then for analysis to continue.
|
|
; revise(decl_question(T)).
|
|
|
|
:- func reason_to_string(reason_for_question) = string.
|
|
|
|
:- type analyser_state(T).
|
|
|
|
:- type search_mode.
|
|
|
|
:- func divide_and_query_search_mode = search_mode.
|
|
|
|
:- func top_down_search_mode = search_mode.
|
|
|
|
:- pred analyser_state_init(io_action_map::in, analyser_state(T)::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Resets the state of the analyser except for the io_action_map.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred reset_analyser(analyser_state(T)::in, analyser_state(T)::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Make the given search mode the fallback search mode
|
|
% and the current search mode for the analyser.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred set_fallback_search_mode(search_mode::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::in, analyser_state(T)::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
:- pred analyser_state_replace_io_map(io_action_map::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::in, analyser_state(T)::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
:- type analysis_type(T)
|
|
% Use the given tree to do analysis. The tree will be
|
|
% a new explicitly generated portion of the annotated
|
|
% trace. start_or_resume_analysis should be called
|
|
% with this type of analysis when a new declarative
|
|
% debugging session has been started or a requested
|
|
% subtree or supertree has been generated.
|
|
---> new_tree(T)
|
|
% Continue the previous analysis. This will happen
|
|
% when the user suspends a declarative debugging
|
|
% session with a `pd' or `abort' command and now wants
|
|
% to continue the suspended session.
|
|
; resume_previous.
|
|
|
|
% Perform analysis on the given EDT, which may be a new tree
|
|
% to diagnose, or a sub-tree that was required to be made
|
|
% explicit.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred start_or_resume_analysis(S::in, analysis_type(T)::in,
|
|
analyser_response(T)::out, analyser_state(T)::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
% Continue analysis after the oracle has responded with an
|
|
% answer.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred continue_analysis(S::in, decl_answer(T)::in,
|
|
analyser_response(T)::out, analyser_state(T)::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
% Display information about the current question and the state
|
|
% of the search to the supplied output stream.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred show_info(S::in, io.output_stream::in, analyser_state(T)::in,
|
|
analyser_response(T)::out, io::di, io::uo) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
% Revise the current analysis. This is done when a bug determined
|
|
% by the analyser has been overruled by the oracle.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred revise_analysis(S::in, analyser_response(T)::out, analyser_state(T)::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
% Return information within the analyser state that is intended for
|
|
% debugging the declarative debugger itself.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred debug_analyser_state(analyser_state(T)::in,
|
|
maybe(subterm_origin(T))::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- implementation.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module mdb.declarative_edt.
|
|
:- import_module mdb.declarative_execution.
|
|
:- import_module mdbcomp.prim_data.
|
|
:- import_module mdbcomp.program_representation.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module bool, exception, counter, array, list, float.
|
|
:- import_module math, string, map, int.
|
|
|
|
% Describes what search strategy is being used by the analyser and the
|
|
% state of the search.
|
|
%
|
|
:- type search_mode
|
|
% Look for the first unknown suspect in a top-down
|
|
% fashion, starting at the root. If no unknown
|
|
% suspects are found then choose a skipped suspect
|
|
% to requery.
|
|
---> top_down
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
% Follow the subterm all the way to where it's bound or
|
|
% until it can't be followed any further (for example
|
|
% when there is a call to a module with no tracing),
|
|
% and ask a question about the nearest unknown suspect
|
|
% on the subterm dependency chain. Then proceed to do
|
|
% a binary search between this node and the root of the
|
|
% search space (the binary search will only come into
|
|
% effect if the oracle asserts the suspect is correct
|
|
% or inadmissible).
|
|
%
|
|
; follow_subterm_end(
|
|
%
|
|
% The following 3 args give the position the
|
|
% sub-term tracking algorithm has got up to if
|
|
% it needs to stop to wait for an explicit
|
|
% sub/super-tree to be generated.
|
|
%
|
|
suspect_id,
|
|
arg_pos,
|
|
term_path,
|
|
|
|
% The last suspect on the dependency chain
|
|
% whose status was unknown. Initially this is
|
|
% no, but as the sub-term is tracked to where
|
|
% it was initially bound (which could be above
|
|
% or below the node where it was marked
|
|
% incorrect), the most recent node through
|
|
% which the sub-term was tracked that has a
|
|
% status of `unknown' is stored in this field.
|
|
% This is then used as the next question if the
|
|
% node that bound the sub-term is trusted or in
|
|
% an excluded part of the search tree.
|
|
maybe(suspect_id)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
% Perform a binary search on a path in the search space
|
|
% between a suspect and an ancestor of the suspect.
|
|
% The path is represented as an array (the 1st
|
|
% argument) with the deeper suspect at the end of the
|
|
% array and its ancestor at the beginning.
|
|
% The range field gives the inclusive subrange of the
|
|
% array to search. last_tested is the index into the
|
|
% array of the last suspect about which a question was
|
|
% asked.
|
|
%
|
|
; binary(
|
|
suspects :: array(suspect_id),
|
|
range :: pair(int, int),
|
|
last_tested :: int
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
%
|
|
% An adapted version of the divide and query approach
|
|
% proposed by Shapiro. We weight each node with the
|
|
% number of events executed by descendent children
|
|
% plus the internal body events of the call. This is
|
|
% mainly because it's hard to work out how many
|
|
% descendents are in unmaterialized portions of the EDT
|
|
% without using memory proportional to the
|
|
% unmaterialized portion.
|
|
%
|
|
divide_and_query.
|
|
|
|
divide_and_query_search_mode = divide_and_query.
|
|
|
|
top_down_search_mode = top_down.
|
|
|
|
% Each search algorithm should respond with either a question
|
|
% or a request for an explicit subtree to be generated for a suspect
|
|
% which is the root of an implicit subtree.
|
|
%
|
|
:- type search_response
|
|
---> question(suspect_id, reason_for_question)
|
|
; require_explicit_subtree(suspect_id)
|
|
; require_explicit_supertree
|
|
; no_suspects.
|
|
|
|
% The reason the declarative debugger asked a question.
|
|
%
|
|
:- type reason_for_question
|
|
---> start % The first question.
|
|
; top_down
|
|
; binding_node(
|
|
binding_prim_op :: primitive_op_type,
|
|
binding_filename :: string,
|
|
binding_line_no :: int,
|
|
% The path of the subterm in the binding node,
|
|
% if it appears in the binding node's atom.
|
|
maybe_atom_path :: maybe(term_path),
|
|
binding_proc :: proc_label,
|
|
binding_node_eliminated :: bool
|
|
)
|
|
; subterm_no_proc_rep % No proc rep when tracking subterm.
|
|
; binding_node_eliminated
|
|
; binary(
|
|
binary_reason_bottom :: int,
|
|
binary_reason_top :: int,
|
|
binary_reason_split :: int
|
|
)
|
|
; divide_and_query(
|
|
old_weight :: int,
|
|
choosen_subtree_weight :: int
|
|
)
|
|
; skipped
|
|
; revise.
|
|
|
|
% The analyser state records all of the information that needs
|
|
% to be remembered across multiple invocations of the analyser.
|
|
%
|
|
:- type analyser_state(T)
|
|
---> analyser(
|
|
|
|
% Information about the EDT nodes relevent to
|
|
% the bug search.
|
|
search_space :: search_space(T),
|
|
|
|
% This is set to yes when an explicit tree
|
|
% needs to be generated.
|
|
% The maybe argument says what type of explicit
|
|
% tree needs to be generated.
|
|
require_explicit :: maybe(explicit_tree_type),
|
|
|
|
% The method currently being employed to search
|
|
% the search space for questions for the
|
|
% oracle.
|
|
search_mode :: search_mode,
|
|
|
|
% The search mode to use by default.
|
|
% Only non-parametrized search modes should
|
|
% be used as the fallback search mode.
|
|
fallback_search_mode :: search_mode,
|
|
|
|
% Everytime a search finds a suspect to
|
|
% ask the oracle about it is put in this field
|
|
% before asking the oracle, so the analyser
|
|
% knows how to modify the search space when
|
|
% it gets an answer.
|
|
last_search_question :: maybe(suspect_and_reason),
|
|
|
|
% This field allows us to map I/O action
|
|
% numbers to the actions themselves.
|
|
io_action_map :: io_action_map,
|
|
|
|
% This field is present only to make it easier
|
|
% to debug the dependency tracking algorithm;
|
|
% if bound to yes, it records the result of
|
|
% the invocation of that algorithm on the last
|
|
% analysis step.
|
|
debug_origin :: maybe(subterm_origin(T))
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- type suspect_and_reason
|
|
---> suspect_and_reason(suspect_id, reason_for_question).
|
|
|
|
:- type explicit_tree_type
|
|
|
|
% Generate an explicit subtree for the implicit root
|
|
% referenced by the suspect_id.
|
|
---> explicit_subtree(suspect_id)
|
|
|
|
% Generate a new explicit tree above the current
|
|
% explicit tree.
|
|
; explicit_supertree.
|
|
|
|
analyser_state_init(IoActionMap, Analyser) :-
|
|
Analyser = analyser(empty_search_space, no, top_down,
|
|
top_down, no, IoActionMap, no).
|
|
|
|
reset_analyser(!Analyser) :-
|
|
FallBack = !.Analyser ^ fallback_search_mode,
|
|
!:Analyser = analyser(empty_search_space, no, FallBack,
|
|
FallBack, no, !.Analyser ^ io_action_map, no).
|
|
|
|
set_fallback_search_mode(FallBackSearchMode, !Analyser) :-
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ fallback_search_mode := FallBackSearchMode,
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_mode := FallBackSearchMode.
|
|
|
|
analyser_state_replace_io_map(IoActionMap, !Analyser) :-
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ io_action_map := IoActionMap.
|
|
|
|
debug_analyser_state(Analyser, Analyser ^ debug_origin).
|
|
|
|
start_or_resume_analysis(Store, AnalysisType, Response, !Analyser) :-
|
|
(
|
|
AnalysisType = new_tree(Node),
|
|
MaybeRequireExplicit = !.Analyser ^ require_explicit,
|
|
(
|
|
MaybeRequireExplicit = yes(TreeType),
|
|
SearchSpace0 = !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
(
|
|
TreeType = explicit_supertree,
|
|
incorporate_explicit_supertree(Store, Node,
|
|
SearchSpace0, SearchSpace)
|
|
;
|
|
TreeType = explicit_subtree(SuspectId),
|
|
incorporate_explicit_subtree(SuspectId, Node,
|
|
SearchSpace0, SearchSpace)
|
|
),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace,
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ require_explicit := no,
|
|
decide_analyser_response(Store, Response, !Analyser)
|
|
;
|
|
MaybeRequireExplicit = no,
|
|
%
|
|
% An explicit subtree was not requested, so this is the
|
|
% start of a new declarative debugging session.
|
|
%
|
|
reset_analyser(!Analyser),
|
|
initialise_search_space(Store, Node, SearchSpace),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace,
|
|
topmost_det(SearchSpace, TopMostId),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ last_search_question :=
|
|
yes(suspect_and_reason(TopMostId, start)),
|
|
edt_question(!.Analyser ^ io_action_map, Store, Node,
|
|
Question),
|
|
Response = revise(Question)
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
AnalysisType = resume_previous,
|
|
decide_analyser_response(Store, Response, !Analyser)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
continue_analysis(Store, Answer, Response, !Analyser) :-
|
|
(
|
|
!.Analyser ^ last_search_question = yes(
|
|
suspect_and_reason(SuspectId, _)),
|
|
process_answer(Store, Answer, SuspectId, !Analyser)
|
|
;
|
|
!.Analyser ^ last_search_question = no,
|
|
throw(internal_error("continue_analysis",
|
|
"received answer to unasked question"))
|
|
),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ last_search_question := no,
|
|
decide_analyser_response(Store, Response, !Analyser).
|
|
|
|
:- pred process_answer(S::in, decl_answer(T)::in, suspect_id::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::in, analyser_state(T)::out)
|
|
is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
process_answer(_, skip(_), SuspectId, !Analyser) :-
|
|
skip_suspect(SuspectId, !.Analyser ^ search_space, SearchSpace),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace.
|
|
|
|
process_answer(Store, ignore(_), SuspectId, !Analyser) :-
|
|
ignore_suspect(Store, SuspectId, !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
SearchSpace),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace.
|
|
|
|
process_answer(_, truth_value(_, correct), SuspectId, !Analyser) :-
|
|
assert_suspect_is_correct(SuspectId, !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
SearchSpace),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace.
|
|
|
|
process_answer(_, truth_value(_, inadmissible), SuspectId, !Analyser) :-
|
|
assert_suspect_is_inadmissible(SuspectId, !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
SearchSpace),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace.
|
|
|
|
process_answer(_, truth_value(_, erroneous), SuspectId, !Analyser) :-
|
|
assert_suspect_is_erroneous(SuspectId, !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
SearchSpace),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace.
|
|
|
|
% process_answer shouldn't be called with a show_info oracle response.
|
|
%
|
|
process_answer(_, show_info(_), _, _, _) :-
|
|
throw(internal_error("process_answer", "called with show_info/1")).
|
|
|
|
|
|
process_answer(Store, suspicious_subterm(Node, ArgPos, TermPath), SuspectId,
|
|
!Analyser) :-
|
|
%
|
|
% XXX The following 2 lines just done so that debugging info can be
|
|
% printed for tests run when declarative_analyser.m not compiled with
|
|
% tracing (so can't use dd_dd command in mdb). Should be removed when
|
|
% edt_dependency becomes stable enough.
|
|
%
|
|
edt_dependency(Store, Node, ArgPos, TermPath, _, DebugOrigin),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ debug_origin := yes(DebugOrigin),
|
|
|
|
edt_subterm_mode(Store, Node, ArgPos, TermPath, Mode),
|
|
(
|
|
Mode = subterm_in,
|
|
assert_suspect_is_inadmissible(SuspectId,
|
|
!.Analyser ^ search_space, SearchSpace)
|
|
;
|
|
Mode = subterm_out,
|
|
assert_suspect_is_erroneous(SuspectId,
|
|
!.Analyser ^ search_space, SearchSpace)
|
|
),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace,
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_mode := follow_subterm_end(SuspectId,
|
|
ArgPos, TermPath, no).
|
|
|
|
revise_analysis(Store, Response, !Analyser) :-
|
|
SearchSpace = !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
(
|
|
root(SearchSpace, RootId)
|
|
->
|
|
Node = get_edt_node(!.Analyser ^ search_space, RootId),
|
|
edt_question(!.Analyser ^ io_action_map, Store, Node,
|
|
Question),
|
|
Response = revise(Question),
|
|
revise_root(Store, SearchSpace, SearchSpace1),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space := SearchSpace1,
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ last_search_question :=
|
|
yes(suspect_and_reason(RootId, revise)),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_mode :=
|
|
!.Analyser ^ fallback_search_mode
|
|
;
|
|
% There must be a root, since a bug was found (and is now
|
|
% being revised).
|
|
throw(internal_error("revise_analysis", "no root"))
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred decide_analyser_response(S::in, analyser_response(T)::out,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::in, analyser_state(T)::out)
|
|
is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
decide_analyser_response(Store, Response, !Analyser) :-
|
|
maybe_check_search_space_consistency(Store, !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
"Start of decide_analyser_response"),
|
|
some [!SearchSpace] (
|
|
!:SearchSpace = !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
(
|
|
root(!.SearchSpace, RootId),
|
|
suspect_is_bug(Store, RootId, !SearchSpace,
|
|
CorrectDescendents, InadmissibleChildren)
|
|
->
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space :=
|
|
!.SearchSpace,
|
|
bug_response(Store, !.Analyser ^ io_action_map,
|
|
!.SearchSpace, RootId,
|
|
[RootId | CorrectDescendents],
|
|
InadmissibleChildren, Response)
|
|
;
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, !.Analyser ^ search_mode,
|
|
!.Analyser ^ fallback_search_mode, NewMode,
|
|
SearchResponse),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_space :=
|
|
!.SearchSpace,
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ search_mode := NewMode,
|
|
handle_search_response(Store, SearchResponse,
|
|
!Analyser, Response)
|
|
)
|
|
),
|
|
maybe_check_search_space_consistency(Store, !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
"End of decide_analyser_response").
|
|
|
|
:- pred handle_search_response(S::in, search_response::in,
|
|
analyser_state(T)::in, analyser_state(T)::out,
|
|
analyser_response(T)::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
handle_search_response(Store, question(SuspectId, Reason), !Analyser,
|
|
Response) :-
|
|
SearchSpace = !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
Node = get_edt_node(SearchSpace, SuspectId),
|
|
edt_question(!.Analyser ^ io_action_map, Store, Node,
|
|
OracleQuestion),
|
|
(
|
|
(
|
|
suspect_unknown(SearchSpace, SuspectId)
|
|
;
|
|
suspect_skipped(SearchSpace, SuspectId)
|
|
)
|
|
->
|
|
Response = oracle_question(OracleQuestion)
|
|
;
|
|
suspect_ignored(SearchSpace, SuspectId)
|
|
->
|
|
% Searches should not respond with questions about suspects we
|
|
% already know to be trusted.
|
|
throw(internal_error("handle_search_response",
|
|
"search responded with query about ignored suspect"))
|
|
;
|
|
% We already known something about this suspect, but the search
|
|
% wants the oracle to be requeried. This may happen if the
|
|
% search thinks the user might have answered the question
|
|
% incorrectly before.
|
|
Response = revise(OracleQuestion)
|
|
),
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ last_search_question :=
|
|
yes(suspect_and_reason(SuspectId, Reason)).
|
|
|
|
handle_search_response(_, require_explicit_subtree(SuspectId), !Analyser,
|
|
Response) :-
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ require_explicit := yes(explicit_subtree(
|
|
SuspectId)),
|
|
Node = get_edt_node(!.Analyser ^ search_space, SuspectId),
|
|
Response = require_explicit_subtree(Node).
|
|
|
|
handle_search_response(_, require_explicit_supertree, !Analyser, Response) :-
|
|
!:Analyser = !.Analyser ^ require_explicit := yes(explicit_supertree),
|
|
SearchSpace = !.Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
topmost_det(SearchSpace, TopMostId),
|
|
TopMost = get_edt_node(SearchSpace, TopMostId),
|
|
Response = require_explicit_supertree(TopMost).
|
|
|
|
handle_search_response(_, no_suspects, !Analyser, no_suspects).
|
|
|
|
% bug_response(Store, IoActionMap, SearchSpace, BugId, Evidence,
|
|
% InadmissibleChildren, Response)
|
|
% Create a bug analyser-response using the given Evidence. If
|
|
% InadmissibleChildren isn't empty then an i_bug will be created,
|
|
% otherwise an e_bug will be created.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred bug_response(S::in, io_action_map::in, search_space(T)::in,
|
|
suspect_id::in, list(suspect_id)::in, list(suspect_id)::in,
|
|
analyser_response(T)::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
bug_response(Store, IoActionMap, SearchSpace, BugId, Evidence,
|
|
InadmissibleChildren, Response) :-
|
|
BugNode = get_edt_node(SearchSpace, BugId),
|
|
(
|
|
InadmissibleChildren = [InadmissibleChild | _],
|
|
edt_get_i_bug(Store, BugNode,
|
|
get_edt_node(SearchSpace, InadmissibleChild), IBug),
|
|
Bug = i_bug(IBug)
|
|
;
|
|
InadmissibleChildren = [],
|
|
edt_get_e_bug(IoActionMap, Store, BugNode, EBug),
|
|
Bug = e_bug(EBug)
|
|
),
|
|
EDTNodes = list.map(get_edt_node(SearchSpace), Evidence),
|
|
list.map(edt_question(IoActionMap, Store), EDTNodes,
|
|
EvidenceAsQuestions),
|
|
Response = bug_found(Bug, EvidenceAsQuestions).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% Search the search space for a question for the oracle. The search
|
|
% should respond with a question about a suspect, or a request for an
|
|
% explicit subree to be generated. A new search mode is returned so
|
|
% that the search algorithm being used can remember its current state
|
|
% next time round.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred search(S::in, search_space(T)::in, search_space(T)::out,
|
|
search_mode::in, search_mode::in,
|
|
search_mode::out, search_response::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, top_down, FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response) :-
|
|
top_down_search(Store, !SearchSpace, Response),
|
|
% We always go back to the fallback search mode after a top-down
|
|
% search, because some fallback searches (such as divide and query)
|
|
% use top-down as a fail safe and we want the fallback search to
|
|
% resume after the top-down search.
|
|
NewMode = FallBackSearchMode.
|
|
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, follow_subterm_end(SuspectId, ArgPos, TermPath,
|
|
LastUnknown), FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response) :-
|
|
follow_subterm_end_search(Store, !SearchSpace, LastUnknown, SuspectId,
|
|
ArgPos, TermPath, FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response).
|
|
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, binary(PathArray, Top - Bottom, LastTested),
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response) :-
|
|
binary_search(Store, PathArray, Top, Bottom, LastTested, !SearchSpace,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response).
|
|
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, divide_and_query, _, NewMode, Response) :-
|
|
divide_and_query_search(Store, !SearchSpace, Response, NewMode).
|
|
|
|
:- pred top_down_search(S::in, search_space(T)::in, search_space(T)::out,
|
|
search_response::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
top_down_search(Store, !SearchSpace, Response) :-
|
|
%
|
|
% If there's no root yet (because the oracle hasn't asserted any nodes
|
|
% are erroneous yet) then use the topmost suspect as a starting point.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
root(!.SearchSpace, RootId)
|
|
->
|
|
Start = RootId
|
|
;
|
|
topmost_det(!.SearchSpace, Start)
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
first_unknown_descendent(Store, Start,
|
|
!.SearchSpace, SearchSpace1, MaybeDescendent)
|
|
->
|
|
SearchSpace1 = !:SearchSpace,
|
|
(
|
|
MaybeDescendent = yes(Unknown),
|
|
Response = question(Unknown, top_down)
|
|
;
|
|
MaybeDescendent = no,
|
|
(
|
|
choose_skipped_suspect(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
SkippedSuspect)
|
|
->
|
|
Response = question(SkippedSuspect, skipped)
|
|
;
|
|
%
|
|
% Try to extend the search space upwards. If
|
|
% this fails and we're not at the topmost
|
|
% traced node, then request that an explicit
|
|
% supertree be generated.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
extend_search_space_upwards(Store,
|
|
!.SearchSpace,
|
|
ExtendedSearchSpace)
|
|
->
|
|
top_down_search(Store,
|
|
ExtendedSearchSpace,
|
|
!:SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
;
|
|
topmost_det(!.SearchSpace, TopMostId),
|
|
TopMostNode =
|
|
get_edt_node(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
TopMostId),
|
|
(
|
|
edt_topmost_node(Store,
|
|
TopMostNode)
|
|
->
|
|
% We can't look any higher.
|
|
Response = no_suspects
|
|
;
|
|
Response =
|
|
require_explicit_supertree
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
%
|
|
% An explicit subtree is required, so pick an implicit root
|
|
% to make explicit. pick_implicit_root/3 will choose an
|
|
% implicit root that is a descendent of the root id of the
|
|
% search space. There is no point in making an implicit root
|
|
% that is not a descendent of the root id explicit, since
|
|
% all suspects above the root id have been excluded from the
|
|
% bug search. pick_implicit_root will also not choose an
|
|
% implicit root that is a descendent of a correct or
|
|
% inadmissible node, for the same reason.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
pick_implicit_root(Store, !.SearchSpace, ImplicitRoot)
|
|
->
|
|
Response = require_explicit_subtree(ImplicitRoot)
|
|
;
|
|
throw(internal_error("top_down_search",
|
|
"first_unknown_descendent requires an "
|
|
++ "explicit subtree to be generated, but "
|
|
++ "pick_implicit_root couldn't find an "
|
|
++ "implicit root to generate an "
|
|
++ "explicit subtree from"))
|
|
)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred follow_subterm_end_search(S::in, search_space(T)::in,
|
|
search_space(T)::out, maybe(suspect_id)::in, suspect_id::in,
|
|
arg_pos::in, term_path::in, search_mode::in, search_mode::out,
|
|
search_response::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
follow_subterm_end_search(Store, !SearchSpace, LastUnknown, SuspectId, ArgPos,
|
|
TermPath, FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, SearchResponse) :-
|
|
find_subterm_origin(Store, SuspectId, ArgPos, TermPath, !SearchSpace,
|
|
FindOriginResponse),
|
|
(
|
|
FindOriginResponse = primitive_op(BindingSuspectId, FileName,
|
|
LineNo, PrimOpType, Output),
|
|
ProcLabel = get_proc_label_for_suspect(Store, !.SearchSpace,
|
|
BindingSuspectId),
|
|
(
|
|
Output = yes,
|
|
% BindingSuspectId = SuspectId since the
|
|
% subterm is an output of SuspectId.
|
|
BindingNode = get_edt_node(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
SuspectId),
|
|
ArgNum = edt_arg_pos_to_user_arg_num(Store,
|
|
BindingNode, ArgPos),
|
|
MaybePath = yes([ArgNum | TermPath])
|
|
;
|
|
Output = no,
|
|
% Since the subterm is not an output of the
|
|
% binding node, it will not appear in any of the
|
|
% arguments of the binding node (it can't be an
|
|
% input, because then it would have been bound outside
|
|
% the node).
|
|
MaybePath = no
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
% We ask about the binding node even if it was
|
|
% previously skipped, since this behaviour is
|
|
% more predictable from the user's perspective.
|
|
%
|
|
( suspect_unknown(!.SearchSpace, BindingSuspectId)
|
|
; suspect_skipped(!.SearchSpace, BindingSuspectId)
|
|
)
|
|
->
|
|
SearchResponse = question(BindingSuspectId,
|
|
binding_node(PrimOpType, FileName, LineNo,
|
|
MaybePath, ProcLabel, no)),
|
|
setup_binary_search(!.SearchSpace, BindingSuspectId,
|
|
NewMode)
|
|
;
|
|
(
|
|
LastUnknown = yes(Unknown),
|
|
Reason = binding_node(PrimOpType,
|
|
FileName, LineNo, MaybePath, ProcLabel,
|
|
yes),
|
|
SearchResponse = question(Unknown, Reason),
|
|
setup_binary_search(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
Unknown, NewMode)
|
|
;
|
|
LastUnknown = no,
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, FallBackSearchMode,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode,
|
|
SearchResponse)
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
FindOriginResponse = not_found,
|
|
(
|
|
LastUnknown = yes(Unknown),
|
|
SearchResponse = question(Unknown,
|
|
subterm_no_proc_rep),
|
|
setup_binary_search(!.SearchSpace, Unknown, NewMode)
|
|
;
|
|
LastUnknown = no,
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, FallBackSearchMode,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, SearchResponse)
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
FindOriginResponse = require_explicit_subtree,
|
|
SearchResponse = require_explicit_subtree(SuspectId),
|
|
%
|
|
% Record the current position of the search so
|
|
% we can continue where we left off once the explicit
|
|
% subtree has been generated.
|
|
%
|
|
NewMode = follow_subterm_end(SuspectId, ArgPos, TermPath,
|
|
LastUnknown)
|
|
;
|
|
FindOriginResponse = require_explicit_supertree,
|
|
SearchResponse = require_explicit_supertree,
|
|
NewMode = follow_subterm_end(SuspectId, ArgPos, TermPath,
|
|
LastUnknown)
|
|
;
|
|
FindOriginResponse = origin(OriginId, OriginArgPos,
|
|
OriginTermPath),
|
|
(
|
|
suspect_unknown(!.SearchSpace, OriginId)
|
|
->
|
|
NewLastUnknown = yes(OriginId)
|
|
;
|
|
NewLastUnknown = LastUnknown
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
%
|
|
% Check if it's worth continuing tracking the sub-term.
|
|
% We want to stop if we enter a portion of the search
|
|
% space known not to contain the bug from which we
|
|
% can't return (for example if we come across an
|
|
% erroneous node where the sub-term is an input).
|
|
%
|
|
give_up_subterm_tracking(!.SearchSpace, OriginId)
|
|
->
|
|
(
|
|
LastUnknown = yes(Unknown),
|
|
SearchResponse = question(Unknown,
|
|
binding_node_eliminated),
|
|
setup_binary_search(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
Unknown, NewMode)
|
|
;
|
|
LastUnknown = no,
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, FallBackSearchMode,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode,
|
|
SearchResponse)
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
%
|
|
% This recursive call will not lead to an infinite loop
|
|
% because eventually either the sub-term will be bound
|
|
% (and find_subterm_origin will respond with
|
|
% primitive_op/3) or there will be insufficient tracing
|
|
% information to continue (and find_subterm_origin will
|
|
% respond with not_found).
|
|
%
|
|
follow_subterm_end_search(Store, !SearchSpace,
|
|
NewLastUnknown, OriginId, OriginArgPos,
|
|
OriginTermPath, FallBackSearchMode, NewMode,
|
|
SearchResponse)
|
|
)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
% setup_binary_search(SearchSpace, SuspectId, Response, SearchMode).
|
|
% Sets up the search mode to do a binary search between SuspectId
|
|
% and either the root of the search space if a suspect has
|
|
% previously been marked erroneous, or the topmost node if no suspect
|
|
% has yet been marked erroneous.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred setup_binary_search(search_space(T)::in, suspect_id::in,
|
|
search_mode::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
setup_binary_search(SearchSpace, SuspectId, SearchMode) :-
|
|
(
|
|
root(SearchSpace, RootId)
|
|
->
|
|
TopId = RootId,
|
|
BottomId = SuspectId
|
|
;
|
|
topmost_det(SearchSpace, TopId),
|
|
BottomId = SuspectId
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
get_path(SearchSpace, BottomId, TopId, Path)
|
|
->
|
|
PathArray = array.from_list(Path),
|
|
array.bounds(PathArray, Top, Bottom),
|
|
SearchMode = binary(PathArray, Top - Bottom, Bottom)
|
|
;
|
|
throw(internal_error("setup_binary_search",
|
|
"TopId not an ancestor of BottomId"))
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred binary_search(S::in, array(suspect_id)::in, int::in, int::in, int::in,
|
|
search_space(T)::in, search_space(T)::out, search_mode::in,
|
|
search_mode::out, search_response::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
binary_search(Store, PathArray, Top, Bottom, LastTested, !SearchSpace,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response) :-
|
|
SuspectId = PathArray ^ elem(LastTested),
|
|
%
|
|
% Check what the result of the query about LastTested was and adjust
|
|
% the range appropriately.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
% The oracle answered `erroneous'.
|
|
suspect_in_excluded_complement(!.SearchSpace, SuspectId)
|
|
->
|
|
NewTop = LastTested + 1,
|
|
NewBottom = Bottom
|
|
;
|
|
% The oracle answered `correct' or `inadmissible'
|
|
suspect_in_excluded_subtree(!.SearchSpace, SuspectId)
|
|
->
|
|
NewTop = Top,
|
|
NewBottom = LastTested - 1
|
|
;
|
|
% The suspect is trusted(ignored) or was skipped.
|
|
NewTop = Top,
|
|
NewBottom = Bottom
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
NewTop > NewBottom
|
|
->
|
|
% Revert to the fallback search mode when binary search is
|
|
% over.
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, FallBackSearchMode,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response)
|
|
;
|
|
(
|
|
find_unknown_closest_to_middle(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
PathArray, NewTop, NewBottom,
|
|
UnknownClosestToMiddle)
|
|
->
|
|
NewMode = binary(PathArray, NewTop - NewBottom,
|
|
UnknownClosestToMiddle),
|
|
Response = question(PathArray ^ elem(
|
|
UnknownClosestToMiddle), binary(NewBottom,
|
|
NewTop, UnknownClosestToMiddle))
|
|
;
|
|
% No unknown suspects on the path, so revert to
|
|
% the fallback search mode.
|
|
search(Store, !SearchSpace, FallBackSearchMode,
|
|
FallBackSearchMode, NewMode, Response)
|
|
)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
% find_unknown_closest_to_middle(SearchSpace, PathArray, Top, Bottom,
|
|
% Unknown).
|
|
% Unknown is the position in PathArray of the suspect which has status
|
|
% unknown and is closest to halfway between From and To which are
|
|
% also indexes into PathArray. Fails if there are no unknown suspects
|
|
% between From and To (inclusive).
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred find_unknown_closest_to_middle(search_space(T)::in,
|
|
array(suspect_id)::in, int::in, int::in, int::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
find_unknown_closest_to_middle(SearchSpace, PathArray, Top, Bottom, Unknown) :-
|
|
Middle = Top + ((Bottom - Top) // 2),
|
|
find_unknown_closest_to_range(SearchSpace, PathArray, Top, Bottom,
|
|
Middle, Middle, Unknown).
|
|
|
|
% find_unknown_closest_to_range(SearchSpace, PathArray, OuterTop,
|
|
% OuterBottom, InnerTop, InnerBottom, Unknown)
|
|
% Unknown is a position in PathArray between OuterTop and OuterBottom
|
|
% (inclusive) where the status of the suspect is unknown. The preferred
|
|
% position to return is as close as possible to InnerTop and
|
|
% InnerBottom, with the proviso that elements between InnerTop and
|
|
% InnerBottom (exclusive) aren't tested, since the caller has already
|
|
% found they were not unknown.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred find_unknown_closest_to_range(search_space(T)::in,
|
|
array(suspect_id)::in, int::in, int::in, int::in, int::in, int::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
find_unknown_closest_to_range(SearchSpace, PathArray, OuterTop, OuterBottom,
|
|
InnerTop, InnerBottom, Unknown) :-
|
|
InnerTop =< InnerBottom,
|
|
( OuterTop =< InnerTop ; InnerBottom =< OuterBottom ),
|
|
(
|
|
OuterTop =< InnerTop,
|
|
suspect_unknown(SearchSpace, PathArray ^ elem(InnerTop))
|
|
->
|
|
Unknown = InnerTop
|
|
;
|
|
InnerBottom =< OuterBottom,
|
|
suspect_unknown(SearchSpace, PathArray ^ elem(InnerBottom))
|
|
->
|
|
Unknown = InnerBottom
|
|
;
|
|
find_unknown_closest_to_range(SearchSpace, PathArray,
|
|
OuterTop, OuterBottom, InnerTop - 1, InnerBottom + 1,
|
|
Unknown)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred divide_and_query_search(S::in, search_space(T)::in,
|
|
search_space(T)::out, search_response::out, search_mode::out) is det
|
|
<= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
divide_and_query_search(Store, !SearchSpace, Response, NewMode) :-
|
|
%
|
|
% If there's no root yet (because the oracle hasn't asserted any nodes
|
|
% are erroneous yet), then use top-down search.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
root(!.SearchSpace, RootId)
|
|
->
|
|
NewMode = divide_and_query,
|
|
(
|
|
children(Store, RootId, !SearchSpace, Children)
|
|
->
|
|
find_middle_weight(Store, Children, RootId, no,
|
|
!SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
;
|
|
Response = require_explicit_subtree(RootId)
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
top_down_search(Store, !SearchSpace, Response),
|
|
NewMode = divide_and_query
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
% Call find_middle_weight/7 if we are able to find the children of the
|
|
% given suspect id, otherwise return a require_explicit_subtree
|
|
% search response in the last argument.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred find_middle_weight_if_children(S::in, suspect_id::in, suspect_id::in,
|
|
maybe(suspect_id)::in, search_space(T)::in, search_space(T)::out,
|
|
search_response::out) is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
find_middle_weight_if_children(Store, SuspectId, TopId, MaybeLastUnknown,
|
|
!SearchSpace, Response) :-
|
|
(
|
|
children(Store, SuspectId, !SearchSpace, Children)
|
|
->
|
|
find_middle_weight(Store, Children, TopId,
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown, !SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
;
|
|
Response = require_explicit_subtree(SuspectId)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
% find_middle_weight(Store, SuspectIds, TopId, MaybeLastUnknown,
|
|
% !SearchSpace, Response).
|
|
% Find the unknown suspect whose weight is closest to half the weight
|
|
% of TopId, considering only the heaviest suspect in SuspectIds, the
|
|
% heaviest child of the heaviest suspect in SuspectIds and so on.
|
|
% MaybeLastUnknown is the last node that was unknown in the search (if
|
|
% any).
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred find_middle_weight(S::in, list(suspect_id)::in, suspect_id::in,
|
|
maybe(suspect_id)::in, search_space(T)::in,
|
|
search_space(T)::out, search_response::out)
|
|
is det <= mercury_edt(S, T).
|
|
|
|
find_middle_weight(Store, [], TopId, MaybeLastUnknown, !SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
:-
|
|
(
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown = yes(LastUnknown),
|
|
Response = question(LastUnknown, divide_and_query(
|
|
get_weight(!.SearchSpace, TopId),
|
|
get_weight(!.SearchSpace, LastUnknown)))
|
|
;
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown = no,
|
|
% This could happen when there were no unknown suspects
|
|
% encountered during the search, in which case we revert
|
|
% to top-down search.
|
|
top_down_search(Store, !SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
).
|
|
find_middle_weight(Store, [SuspectId | SuspectIds], TopId, MaybeLastUnknown,
|
|
!SearchSpace, Response) :-
|
|
TopWeight = get_weight(!.SearchSpace, TopId),
|
|
Target = TopWeight // 2,
|
|
%
|
|
% Find the heaviest suspect:
|
|
%
|
|
Weight = get_weight(!.SearchSpace, SuspectId),
|
|
list.foldl(max_weight(!.SearchSpace), SuspectIds,
|
|
{Weight, SuspectId}, {MaxWeight, Heaviest}),
|
|
(
|
|
MaxWeight > Target
|
|
->
|
|
(
|
|
suspect_unknown(!.SearchSpace, Heaviest)
|
|
->
|
|
NewMaybeLastUnknown = yes(Heaviest)
|
|
;
|
|
NewMaybeLastUnknown = MaybeLastUnknown
|
|
),
|
|
find_middle_weight_if_children(Store, Heaviest, TopId,
|
|
NewMaybeLastUnknown, !SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
;
|
|
(
|
|
suspect_unknown(!.SearchSpace, Heaviest)
|
|
->
|
|
(
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown = yes(LastUnknown),
|
|
LastUnknownWeight = get_weight(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
LastUnknown),
|
|
%
|
|
% If the last unknown suspect was closer to
|
|
% the target weight then ask about it.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
LastUnknownWeight - Target <
|
|
Target - MaxWeight
|
|
->
|
|
Response = question(LastUnknown,
|
|
divide_and_query(TopWeight,
|
|
LastUnknownWeight))
|
|
;
|
|
Response = question(Heaviest,
|
|
divide_and_query(TopWeight,
|
|
MaxWeight))
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown = no,
|
|
Response = question(Heaviest,
|
|
divide_and_query(TopWeight, MaxWeight))
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
(
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown = yes(LastUnknown),
|
|
LastUnknownWeight = get_weight(!.SearchSpace,
|
|
LastUnknown),
|
|
Response = question(LastUnknown,
|
|
divide_and_query(TopWeight,
|
|
LastUnknownWeight))
|
|
;
|
|
MaybeLastUnknown = no,
|
|
% Look deeper until we find an unknown:
|
|
find_middle_weight_if_children(Store, Heaviest,
|
|
TopId, no, !SearchSpace, Response)
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred max_weight(search_space(T)::in, suspect_id::in,
|
|
{int, suspect_id}::in, {int, suspect_id}::out)
|
|
is det.
|
|
|
|
max_weight(SearchSpace, SuspectId, {PrevMax, PrevSuspectId},
|
|
{NewMax, NewSuspectId}) :-
|
|
Weight = get_weight(SearchSpace, SuspectId),
|
|
(
|
|
Weight > PrevMax
|
|
->
|
|
NewMax = Weight,
|
|
NewSuspectId = SuspectId
|
|
;
|
|
NewMax = PrevMax,
|
|
NewSuspectId = PrevSuspectId
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(start) = "this is the node where the `dd' command "
|
|
++ "was issued.".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(binding_node(PrimOpType, FileName, LineNo,
|
|
MaybePath, ProcLabel, Eliminated)) = Str :-
|
|
PrimOpStr = primitive_op_type_to_string(PrimOpType),
|
|
LineNoStr = int_to_string(LineNo),
|
|
get_pred_attributes(ProcLabel, SymModule, Name, Arity,
|
|
PredOrFunc),
|
|
(
|
|
PredOrFunc = function,
|
|
PredOrFuncStr = "function"
|
|
;
|
|
PredOrFunc = predicate,
|
|
PredOrFuncStr = "predicate"
|
|
),
|
|
Module = sym_name_to_string(SymModule),
|
|
ArityStr = int_to_string(Arity),
|
|
(
|
|
Eliminated = yes,
|
|
EliminatedSent = " That node was, however, previously "
|
|
++ "eliminated from the bug search."
|
|
;
|
|
Eliminated = no,
|
|
EliminatedSent = ""
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
MaybePath = yes(Path),
|
|
PathStrings = list.map(int_to_string, Path),
|
|
PathStr = string.join_list("/", PathStrings),
|
|
PathSent = "The path to the subterm in the atom is " ++
|
|
PathStr ++ "."
|
|
;
|
|
MaybePath = no,
|
|
PathSent = ""
|
|
),
|
|
Str = "the marked subterm was bound by the " ++
|
|
PrimOpStr ++ " inside the " ++ PredOrFuncStr ++
|
|
" " ++ Module ++ "." ++ Name ++ "/" ++ ArityStr ++
|
|
" (" ++ FileName ++ ":" ++ LineNoStr ++ "). " ++
|
|
PathSent ++ EliminatedSent.
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(top_down) = "this is the next node in the top-down "
|
|
++ "search.".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(subterm_no_proc_rep) =
|
|
"tracking of the marked subterm had to be aborted here, because of "
|
|
++ "missing tracing information.".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(binding_node_eliminated) =
|
|
"tracking of the marked subterm was stopped here, because the binding "
|
|
++ "node lies in a portion of the tree which has been eliminated.".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(binary(Bottom, Top, Split)) = Str :-
|
|
PathLengthStr = int_to_string_thousands(Bottom - Top + 1),
|
|
SubPath1LengthStr = int_to_string_thousands(Bottom - Split),
|
|
SubPath2LengthStr = int_to_string_thousands(Split - Top + 1),
|
|
Str = "this node divides a path of length " ++ PathLengthStr
|
|
++ " into two paths of length " ++
|
|
SubPath1LengthStr ++ " and " ++ SubPath2LengthStr ++ ".".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(divide_and_query(OldWeight, SubtreeWeight)) = Str :-
|
|
Weight1Str = int_to_string_thousands(OldWeight - SubtreeWeight),
|
|
Weight2Str = int_to_string_thousands(SubtreeWeight),
|
|
Str = "this node divides the suspect area into " ++
|
|
"two regions of " ++ Weight1Str ++ " and " ++ Weight2Str ++
|
|
" events each.".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(skipped) = "there are no more non-skipped questions "
|
|
++ "left.".
|
|
|
|
reason_to_string(revise) = "this node is being revised, because of "
|
|
++ "an unsuccessful previous bug search.".
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
show_info(Store, OutStream, Analyser, Response, !IO) :-
|
|
SearchSpace = Analyser ^ search_space,
|
|
some [!FieldNames, !Data] (
|
|
!:FieldNames = [],
|
|
!:Data = [],
|
|
%
|
|
% Get the context of the current question.
|
|
%
|
|
(
|
|
Analyser ^ last_search_question =
|
|
yes(suspect_and_reason(LastId, Reason)),
|
|
(
|
|
edt_context(Store, get_edt_node(SearchSpace,
|
|
LastId), FileName - LineNo,
|
|
MaybeReturnContext)
|
|
->
|
|
(
|
|
MaybeReturnContext =
|
|
yes(ReturnFileName -
|
|
ReturnLineNo),
|
|
ContextStr = FileName ++ ":" ++
|
|
int_to_string(LineNo) ++
|
|
" (" ++ ReturnFileName ++ ":"
|
|
++ int_to_string(ReturnLineNo)
|
|
++ ")"
|
|
;
|
|
MaybeReturnContext = no,
|
|
ContextStr = FileName ++ ":" ++
|
|
int_to_string(LineNo)
|
|
),
|
|
list.append(!.FieldNames,
|
|
["Context of current question"],
|
|
!:FieldNames),
|
|
list.append(!.Data, [ContextStr], !:Data)
|
|
;
|
|
true
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
Analyser ^ last_search_question = no,
|
|
throw(internal_error("show_info", "no last question"))
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
list.append(!.FieldNames, ["Search mode"],
|
|
!:FieldNames),
|
|
list.append(!.Data, [search_mode_to_string(
|
|
Analyser ^ search_mode)], !:Data),
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
Analyser ^ search_mode = divide_and_query
|
|
->
|
|
list.append(!.FieldNames,
|
|
["Estimated questions remaining"],
|
|
!:FieldNames),
|
|
EstimatedQuestions = float.ceiling_to_int(
|
|
math.log2(float(Weight))),
|
|
list.append(!.Data,
|
|
[int_to_string(EstimatedQuestions)], !:Data)
|
|
;
|
|
true
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
list.append(!.FieldNames, ["Number of suspect events"],
|
|
!:FieldNames),
|
|
(
|
|
root(SearchSpace, RootId)
|
|
->
|
|
StartId = RootId
|
|
;
|
|
topmost_det(SearchSpace, StartId)
|
|
),
|
|
Weight = get_weight(SearchSpace, StartId),
|
|
list.append(!.Data, [int_to_string_thousands(Weight)], !:Data),
|
|
|
|
InfoMessage = string.format_table([left(!.FieldNames),
|
|
left(!.Data)], " : ")
|
|
),
|
|
ReasonStr = reason_to_string(Reason),
|
|
ReasonSent = "The current question was chosen because " ++ ReasonStr,
|
|
WrappedReason = string.word_wrap(ReasonSent, 72),
|
|
io.format(OutStream, "%s\n%s\n", [s(InfoMessage), s(WrappedReason)],
|
|
!IO),
|
|
Node = get_edt_node(SearchSpace, LastId),
|
|
edt_question(Analyser ^ io_action_map, Store, Node,
|
|
OracleQuestion),
|
|
Response = oracle_question(OracleQuestion).
|
|
|
|
:- func search_mode_to_string(search_mode) = string.
|
|
|
|
search_mode_to_string(top_down) = "top down".
|
|
search_mode_to_string(follow_subterm_end(_, _, _, _)) =
|
|
"tracking marked sub-term".
|
|
search_mode_to_string(binary(_, _, _)) = "binary search on path".
|
|
search_mode_to_string(divide_and_query) = "divide and query".
|