Files
mercury/compiler/det_analysis.m
Fergus Henderson 0e1e0b0b91 Implement recursive' and non_recursive' pragma c_code declarations.
Estimated hours taken: 4

Implement `recursive' and `non_recursive' pragma c_code declarations.
This allows the compiler to optimize cases when the C code
is known to not call Mercury code.  It's also necessary
to allow C code which modifies the hp register to work
(such code must be declared `non_recursive', otherwise
the registers will be saved and restored over it).
To make things bootstrap OK, the old pragma c_code declarations
default to `non_recursive'.

prog_data.m, hlds_goal.m:
	Add new field c_is_recursive to pragma c_code goals.

prog_io.m:
	Parse the new `recursive' and `non_recursive' pragma c_code
	declarations.

make_hlds.m:
	Pass the c_is_recursive field from the parse tree to the HLDS.

live_vars.m:
	For non-recursive C code, don't save variables on the stack.

code_gen.pp:
	For non-recursive C code, don't save variables on the stack,
	don't mark the succip as needing to be saved, and don't
	call save_registers() and restore_registers().

*.m:
	Change c_code/5 to c_code/6.
1996-06-10 17:18:50 +00:00

833 lines
31 KiB
Mathematica

%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% Copyright (C) 1995 University of Melbourne.
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% det_analysis.m - the determinism analysis pass.
% Main authors: conway, fjh, zs.
% This pass has three components:
%
% o Segregate the procedures into those that have determinism
% declarations, and those that don't
%
% o A step of performing a local inference pass on each procedure
% without a determinism declaration is iterated until
% a fixpoint is reached
%
% o A checking step is performed on all the procedures that have
% determinism declarations to ensure that they are at
% least as deterministic as their declaration. This uses
% a form of the local inference pass.
%
% If we are to avoid global inference for predicates with
% declarations, then it must be an error, not just a warning,
% if the determinism checking step detects that the determinism
% annotation was wrong. If we were to issue just a warning, then
% we would have to override the determinism annotation, and that
% would force us to re-check the inferred determinism for all
% calling predicates.
%
% Alternately, we could leave it as a warning, but then we would
% have to _make_ the predicate deterministic (or semideterministic)
% by inserting run-time checking code which calls error/1 if the
% predicate really isn't deterministic (semideterministic).
% Determinism has three components:
%
% whether a goal can fail
% whether a goal has more than one possible solution
% whether a goal occurs in a context where only the first solution
% is required
%
% The first two components are synthesized attributes: they are inferred
% bottom-up. The last component is an inherited attribute: it is
% propagated top-down.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- module det_analysis.
:- interface.
:- import_module hlds_module, hlds_pred, hlds_data, io.
% Perform determinism inference for local predicates with no
% determinism declarations, and determinism checking for all other
% predicates.
:- pred determinism_pass(module_info, module_info, io__state, io__state).
:- mode determinism_pass(in, out, di, uo) is det.
% Check the determinism of a single procedure
% (only works if the determinism of the procedures it calls
% has already been inferred).
:- pred determinism_check_proc(proc_id, pred_id, module_info, module_info,
io__state, io__state).
:- mode determinism_check_proc(in, in, in, out, di, uo) is det.
% The tables for computing the determinism of compound goals
% from the determinism of their components.
:- pred det_conjunction_maxsoln(soln_count, soln_count, soln_count).
:- mode det_conjunction_maxsoln(in, in, out) is det.
:- pred det_conjunction_canfail(can_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
:- mode det_conjunction_canfail(in, in, out) is det.
:- pred det_disjunction_maxsoln(soln_count, soln_count, soln_count).
:- mode det_disjunction_maxsoln(in, in, out) is det.
:- pred det_disjunction_canfail(can_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
:- mode det_disjunction_canfail(in, in, out) is det.
:- pred det_switch_maxsoln(soln_count, soln_count, soln_count).
:- mode det_switch_maxsoln(in, in, out) is det.
:- pred det_switch_canfail(can_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
:- mode det_switch_canfail(in, in, out) is det.
:- pred det_negation_det(determinism, maybe(determinism)).
:- mode det_negation_det(in, out) is det.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- implementation.
:- import_module hlds_goal, prog_data, det_report, det_util.
:- import_module mode_util, globals, options, passes_aux.
:- import_module hlds_out, mercury_to_mercury.
:- import_module bool, list, map, set, std_util, require.
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
determinism_pass(ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo) -->
{ determinism_declarations(ModuleInfo0, DeclaredProcs,
UndeclaredProcs) },
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(verbose, Verbose),
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(debug_detism, Debug),
( { UndeclaredProcs = [] } ->
{ ModuleInfo1 = ModuleInfo0 }
;
maybe_write_string(Verbose,
"% Doing determinism inference...\n"),
global_inference_pass(ModuleInfo0, UndeclaredProcs, Debug,
ModuleInfo1),
maybe_write_string(Verbose, "% done.\n")
),
maybe_write_string(Verbose, "% Doing determinism checking...\n"),
global_final_pass(ModuleInfo1, DeclaredProcs, Debug, ModuleInfo),
maybe_write_string(Verbose, "% done.\n").
determinism_check_proc(ProcId, PredId, ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo) -->
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(debug_detism, Debug),
global_final_pass(ModuleInfo0, [proc(PredId, ProcId)], Debug,
ModuleInfo).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- pred global_inference_pass(module_info, pred_proc_list, bool, module_info,
io__state, io__state).
:- mode global_inference_pass(in, in, in, out, di, uo) is det.
% Iterate until a fixpoint is reached. This can be expensive
% if a module has many predicates with undeclared determinisms.
% If this ever becomes a problem, we should switch to doing
% iterations only on strongly connected components of the
% dependency graph.
global_inference_pass(ModuleInfo0, ProcList, Debug, ModuleInfo) -->
global_inference_single_pass(ProcList, Debug, ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo1,
[], Msgs, unchanged, Changed),
maybe_write_string(Debug, "% Inference pass complete\n"),
( { Changed = changed } ->
global_inference_pass(ModuleInfo1, ProcList, Debug, ModuleInfo)
;
% We have arrived a fixpoint. Therefore all the messages we
% have are based on the final determinisms of all procedures,
% which means it is safe to print them.
det_report_and_handle_msgs(Msgs, ModuleInfo1, ModuleInfo)
).
:- pred global_inference_single_pass(pred_proc_list, bool,
module_info, module_info, list(det_msg), list(det_msg),
maybe_changed, maybe_changed, io__state, io__state).
:- mode global_inference_single_pass(in, in, in, out, in, out, in, out, di, uo)
is det.
global_inference_single_pass([], _, ModuleInfo, ModuleInfo, Msgs, Msgs,
Changed, Changed) --> [].
global_inference_single_pass([proc(PredId, ProcId) | PredProcs], Debug,
ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo, Msgs0, Msgs, Changed0, Changed) -->
globals__io_get_globals(Globals),
{ det_infer_proc(PredId, ProcId, ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo1, Globals,
Detism0, Detism, ProcMsgs) },
( { Detism = Detism0 } ->
( { Debug = yes } ->
io__write_string("% Inferred old detism "),
mercury_output_det(Detism),
io__write_string(" for "),
hlds_out__write_pred_proc_id(ModuleInfo1,
PredId, ProcId),
io__write_string("\n")
;
[]
),
{ Changed1 = Changed0 }
;
( { Debug = yes } ->
io__write_string("% Inferred new detism "),
mercury_output_det(Detism),
io__write_string(" for "),
hlds_out__write_pred_proc_id(ModuleInfo1,
PredId, ProcId),
io__write_string("\n")
;
[]
),
{ Changed1 = changed }
),
{ list__append(ProcMsgs, Msgs0, Msgs1) },
global_inference_single_pass(PredProcs, Debug,
ModuleInfo1, ModuleInfo, Msgs1, Msgs, Changed1, Changed).
:- pred global_final_pass(module_info, pred_proc_list, bool,
module_info, io__state, io__state).
:- mode global_final_pass(in, in, in, out, di, uo) is det.
global_final_pass(ModuleInfo0, ProcList, Debug, ModuleInfo) -->
global_inference_single_pass(ProcList, Debug, ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo1,
[], Msgs, unchanged, _),
det_report_and_handle_msgs(Msgs, ModuleInfo1, ModuleInfo2),
global_checking_pass(ProcList, ModuleInfo2, ModuleInfo).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- type soln_context ---> all_solns ; first_soln.
% Infer the determinism of a procedure.
:- pred det_infer_proc(pred_id, proc_id, module_info, module_info, globals,
determinism, determinism, list(det_msg)).
:- mode det_infer_proc(in, in, in, out, in, out, out, out) is det.
det_infer_proc(PredId, ProcId, ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo, Globals,
Detism0, Detism, Msgs) :-
% Get the proc_info structure for this procedure
module_info_preds(ModuleInfo0, Preds0),
map__lookup(Preds0, PredId, Pred0),
pred_info_procedures(Pred0, Procs0),
map__lookup(Procs0, ProcId, Proc0),
% Remember the old inferred determinism of this procedure
proc_info_inferred_determinism(Proc0, Detism0),
% Work out whether the procedure occurs in a single-solution
% context or not. Currently we only assume so if
% the predicate has an explicit determinism declaration
% that says so.
(
proc_info_declared_determinism(Proc0, yes(DeclaredDetism)),
determinism_components(DeclaredDetism, _, at_most_many_cc)
->
SolnContext = first_soln
;
SolnContext = all_solns
),
% Infer the determinism of the goal
proc_info_goal(Proc0, Goal0),
proc_info_get_initial_instmap(Proc0, ModuleInfo0, InstMap0),
det_info_init(ModuleInfo0, PredId, ProcId, Globals, DetInfo),
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Goal, Detism1, Msgs),
% Take the worst of the old and new detisms.
% This is needed to prevent loops on p :- not(p)
% at least if the initial assumed detism is det.
determinism_components(Detism0, CanFail0, MaxSoln0),
determinism_components(Detism1, CanFail1, MaxSoln1),
det_switch_canfail(CanFail0, CanFail1, CanFail),
det_switch_maxsoln(MaxSoln0, MaxSoln1, MaxSoln),
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, MaxSoln),
% Save the newly inferred information
proc_info_set_goal(Proc0, Goal, Proc1),
proc_info_set_inferred_determinism(Proc1, Detism, Proc),
% Put back the new proc_info structure.
map__set(Procs0, ProcId, Proc, Procs),
pred_info_set_procedures(Pred0, Procs, Pred),
map__set(Preds0, PredId, Pred, Preds),
module_info_set_preds(ModuleInfo0, Preds, ModuleInfo).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% Infers the determinism of `Goal0' and returns this in `Detism'.
% It annotates the goal and all its subgoals with their determinism
% and returns the annotated goal in `Goal'.
:- pred det_infer_goal(hlds__goal, instmap, soln_context, det_info,
hlds__goal, determinism, list(det_msg)).
:- mode det_infer_goal(in, in, in, in, out, out, out) is det.
det_infer_goal(Goal0 - GoalInfo0, InstMap0, SolnContext0, DetInfo,
Goal - GoalInfo, Detism, Msgs) :-
goal_info_get_nonlocals(GoalInfo0, NonLocalVars),
goal_info_get_instmap_delta(GoalInfo0, DeltaInstMap),
% If a goal has no output variables, then the goal is in
% single-solution context
( no_output_vars(NonLocalVars, InstMap0, DeltaInstMap, DetInfo) ->
OutputVars = no,
SolnContext = first_soln
;
OutputVars = yes,
SolnContext = SolnContext0
),
det_infer_goal_2(Goal0, GoalInfo0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
NonLocalVars, DeltaInstMap, Goal1, InternalDetism, Msgs1),
determinism_components(InternalDetism, InternalCanFail, InternalSolns),
(
% If a goal with multiple solutions has no output variables,
% then it really it has only one solution
% (we will need to do pruning)
( InternalSolns = at_most_many
; InternalSolns = at_most_many_cc
),
OutputVars = no
->
determinism_components(Detism, InternalCanFail, at_most_one)
;
% If a goal with multiple solutions occurs in a single-solution
% context, then we will need to do pruning
InternalSolns = at_most_many,
SolnContext = first_soln
->
determinism_components(Detism, InternalCanFail, at_most_many_cc)
;
Detism = InternalDetism
),
goal_info_set_determinism(GoalInfo0, Detism, GoalInfo),
% See how we should introduce the commit operator, if one is needed.
(
Detism \= InternalDetism,
Goal1 \= some(_, _)
->
% a commit needed - we must introduce an explicit `some'
% so that the code generator knows to insert the appropriate
% code for pruning
goal_info_set_determinism(GoalInfo0, InternalDetism, InnerInfo),
Goal = some([], Goal1 - InnerInfo),
Msgs = Msgs1
;
% either no commit needed, or a `some' already present
Goal = Goal1,
Msgs = Msgs1
).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- pred det_infer_goal_2(hlds__goal_expr, hlds__goal_info, instmap,
soln_context, det_info, set(var), instmap_delta,
hlds__goal_expr, determinism, list(det_msg)).
:- mode det_infer_goal_2(in, in, in, in, in, in, in, out, out, out) is det.
% The determinism of a conjunction is the worst case of the elements
% of that conjuction.
det_infer_goal_2(conj(Goals0), _, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, _, _,
conj(Goals), Detism, Msgs) :-
det_infer_conj(Goals0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Goals, Detism, Msgs).
det_infer_goal_2(disj(Goals0, FV), _, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, _, _,
disj(Goals, FV), Detism, Msgs) :-
det_infer_disj(Goals0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
can_fail, at_most_zero, Goals, Detism, Msgs).
% The determinism of a switch is the worst of the determinism of each
% of the cases. Also, if only a subset of the constructors are handled,
% then it is semideterministic or worse - this is determined
% in switch_detection.m and handled via the SwitchCanFail field.
det_infer_goal_2(switch(Var, SwitchCanFail, Cases0, FV), _,
InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, _, _,
switch(Var, SwitchCanFail, Cases, FV), Detism, Msgs) :-
det_infer_switch(Cases0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
cannot_fail, at_most_zero, Cases, CasesDetism, Msgs),
determinism_components(CasesDetism, CasesCanFail, CasesSolns),
det_conjunction_canfail(SwitchCanFail, CasesCanFail, CanFail),
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, CasesSolns).
% For calls, just look up the determinism entry associated with
% the called predicate.
% This is the point at which annotations start changing
% when we iterate to fixpoint for global determinism inference.
det_infer_goal_2(call(PredId, ModeId, A, B, C, N, F), GoalInfo, _, SolnContext,
DetInfo, _, _,
call(PredId, ModeId, A, B, C, N, F), Detism, Msgs) :-
det_lookup_detism(DetInfo, PredId, ModeId, Detism),
%
% Make sure we don't try to call a committed-choice pred
% from a non-committed-choice context.
%
determinism_components(Detism, _, NumSolns),
( NumSolns = at_most_many_cc, SolnContext \= first_soln ->
Msgs = [cc_pred_in_wrong_context(GoalInfo, Detism,
PredId, ModeId)]
;
Msgs = []
).
det_infer_goal_2(higher_order_call(PredVar, ArgVars, Types, Modes, Det, Follow),
GoalInfo, _InstMap0, SolnContext,
_MiscInfo, _NonLocalVars, _DeltaInstMap,
higher_order_call(PredVar, ArgVars, Types, Modes, Det, Follow),
Det, Msgs) :-
determinism_components(Det, _, NumSolns),
( NumSolns = at_most_many_cc, SolnContext \= first_soln ->
Msgs = [higher_order_cc_pred_in_wrong_context(GoalInfo, Det)]
;
Msgs = []
).
% unifications are either deterministic or semideterministic.
% (see det_infer_unify).
det_infer_goal_2(unify(LT, RT0, M, U, C), GoalInfo, InstMap0, _SolnContext,
DetInfo, _, _, unify(LT, RT, M, U, C), UnifyDet, Msgs) :-
(
RT0 = lambda_goal(PredOrFunc, Vars, Modes, LambdaDeclaredDet,
Goal0)
->
(
determinism_components(LambdaDeclaredDet, _,
at_most_many_cc)
->
LambdaSolnContext = first_soln
;
LambdaSolnContext = all_solns
),
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, LambdaSolnContext, DetInfo,
Goal, LambdaInferredDet, Msgs1),
det_check_lambda(LambdaDeclaredDet, LambdaInferredDet,
Goal, GoalInfo, DetInfo, Msgs2),
list__append(Msgs1, Msgs2, Msgs),
RT = lambda_goal(PredOrFunc, Vars, Modes, LambdaDeclaredDet,
Goal)
;
RT = RT0,
Msgs = []
),
det_infer_unify(U, UnifyDet).
det_infer_goal_2(if_then_else(Vars, Cond0, Then0, Else0, FV), _GoalInfo0,
InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, _NonLocalVars, _DeltaInstMap,
if_then_else(Vars, Cond, Then, Else, FV), Detism, Msgs) :-
% We process the goal right-to-left, doing the `then' before
% the condition of the if-then-else, so that we can propagate
% the SolnContext correctly.
% First process the `then' part
update_instmap(Cond0, InstMap0, InstMap1),
det_infer_goal(Then0, InstMap1, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Then, ThenDetism, ThenMsgs),
determinism_components(ThenDetism, ThenCanFail, ThenMaxSoln),
% Next, work out the right soln_context to use for the condition.
% The condition is in a first_soln context if and only if the goal
% as a whole was in a first_soln context and the `then' part
% cannot fail.
(
ThenCanFail = cannot_fail,
SolnContext = first_soln
->
CondSolnContext = first_soln
;
CondSolnContext = all_solns
),
% Process the `condition' part
det_infer_goal(Cond0, InstMap0, CondSolnContext, DetInfo,
Cond, CondDetism, CondMsgs),
determinism_components(CondDetism, CondCanFail, CondMaxSoln),
% Process the `else' part
det_infer_goal(Else0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Else, ElseDetism, ElseMsgs),
determinism_components(ElseDetism, ElseCanFail, ElseMaxSoln),
% Finally combine the results from the three parts
( CondCanFail = cannot_fail ->
% A -> B ; C is equivalent to A, B if A cannot fail
det_conjunction_maxsoln(CondMaxSoln, ThenMaxSoln, MaxSoln),
det_conjunction_canfail(CondCanFail, ThenCanFail, CanFail)
; CondMaxSoln = at_most_zero ->
% A -> B ; C is equivalent to ~A, C if A cannot succeed
det_negation_det(CondDetism, MaybeNegDetism),
(
MaybeNegDetism = no,
error("cannot find determinism of negated condition")
;
MaybeNegDetism = yes(NegDetism)
),
determinism_components(NegDetism, NegCanFail, NegMaxSoln),
det_conjunction_maxsoln(NegMaxSoln, ElseMaxSoln, MaxSoln),
det_conjunction_canfail(NegCanFail, ElseCanFail, CanFail)
;
det_conjunction_maxsoln(CondMaxSoln, ThenMaxSoln, CTMaxSoln),
det_switch_maxsoln(CTMaxSoln, ElseMaxSoln, MaxSoln),
det_switch_canfail(ThenCanFail, ElseCanFail, CanFail)
),
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, MaxSoln),
list__append(ThenMsgs, ElseMsgs, AfterMsgs),
list__append(CondMsgs, AfterMsgs, Msgs).
% Negations are almost always semideterministic. It is an error for
% a negation to further instantiate any non-local variable. Such
% errors will be reported by the mode analysis.
%
% Question: should we warn about the negation of goals that either
% cannot succeed or cannot fail?
% Answer: yes, probably, but it's not a high priority.
det_infer_goal_2(not(Goal0), _, InstMap0, _SolnContext, DetInfo, _, _,
not(Goal), Det, Msgs) :-
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, first_soln, DetInfo,
Goal, NegDet, Msgs),
det_negation_det(NegDet, MaybeDet),
(
MaybeDet = no,
error("inappropriate determinism inside a negation")
;
MaybeDet = yes(Det)
).
% Existential quantification may require a cut to throw away solutions,
% but we cannot rely on explicit quantification to detect this.
% Therefore cuts are handled in det_infer_goal.
det_infer_goal_2(some(Vars, Goal0), _, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, _, _,
some(Vars, Goal), Det, Msgs) :-
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Goal, Det, Msgs).
% pragma c_codes are handled in the same way as predicate calls
det_infer_goal_2(pragma_c_code(C_Code, IsRecursive, PredId, ProcId, Args,
ArgNameMap),
GoalInfo, _, SolnContext, DetInfo, _, _,
pragma_c_code(C_Code, IsRecursive, PredId, ProcId, Args,
ArgNameMap),
Detism, Msgs) :-
det_lookup_detism(DetInfo, PredId, ProcId, Detism),
determinism_components(Detism, _, NumSolns),
( NumSolns = at_most_many_cc, SolnContext \= first_soln ->
Msgs = [cc_pred_in_wrong_context(GoalInfo, Detism,
PredId, ProcId)]
;
Msgs = []
).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
:- pred det_infer_conj(list(hlds__goal), instmap, soln_context, det_info,
list(hlds__goal), determinism, list(det_msg)).
:- mode det_infer_conj(in, in, in, in, out, out, out) is det.
det_infer_conj([], _InstMap0, _SolnContext, _DetInfo, [], det, []).
det_infer_conj([Goal0 | Goals0], InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
[Goal | Goals], Detism, Msgs) :-
% We should look to see when we get to a not_reached point
% and optimize away the remaining elements of the conjunction.
% But that optimization is done in the code generation anyway.
% We infer the determinisms right-to-left, so that we can propagate
% the SolnContext properly.
%
% First, process the second and subsequent conjuncts
%
update_instmap(Goal0, InstMap0, InstMap1),
det_infer_conj(Goals0, InstMap1, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Goals, DetismB, MsgsB),
determinism_components(DetismB, CanFailB, MaxSolnsB),
%
% Next, work out whether the first conjunct is in
% a first_soln context or not
%
(
CanFailB = cannot_fail,
SolnContext = first_soln
->
SolnContextA = first_soln
;
SolnContextA = all_solns
),
%
% Process the first conjunct
%
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, SolnContextA, DetInfo,
Goal, DetismA, MsgsA),
determinism_components(DetismA, CanFailA, MaxSolnsA),
%
% Finally combine the results computed above
%
det_conjunction_canfail(CanFailA, CanFailB, CanFail),
det_conjunction_maxsoln(MaxSolnsA, MaxSolnsB, MaxSolns),
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, MaxSolns),
list__append(MsgsA, MsgsB, Msgs).
:- pred det_infer_disj(list(hlds__goal), instmap, soln_context, det_info,
can_fail, soln_count, list(hlds__goal), determinism, list(det_msg)).
:- mode det_infer_disj(in, in, in, in, in, in, out, out, out) is det.
det_infer_disj([], _InstMap0, _SolnContext, _DetInfo, CanFail, MaxSolns,
[], Detism, []) :-
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, MaxSolns).
det_infer_disj([Goal0 | Goals0], InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, CanFail0,
MaxSolns0, [Goal | Goals1], Detism, Msgs) :-
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Goal, Detism1, Msgs1),
determinism_components(Detism1, CanFail1, MaxSolns1),
det_disjunction_canfail(CanFail0, CanFail1, CanFail2),
det_disjunction_maxsoln(MaxSolns0, MaxSolns1, MaxSolns2),
det_infer_disj(Goals0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, CanFail2,
MaxSolns2, Goals1, Detism, Msgs2),
list__append(Msgs1, Msgs2, Msgs3),
( MaxSolns1 = at_most_zero ->
Goal0 = _ - GoalInfo0,
Msgs = [zero_soln_disjunct(GoalInfo0) | Msgs3]
;
Msgs = Msgs3
).
:- pred det_infer_switch(list(case), instmap, soln_context, det_info,
can_fail, soln_count, list(case), determinism, list(det_msg)).
:- mode det_infer_switch(in, in, in, in, in, in, out, out, out) is det.
det_infer_switch([], _InstMap0, _SolnContext, _DetInfo, CanFail, MaxSolns,
[], Detism, []) :-
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, MaxSolns).
det_infer_switch([Case0 | Cases0], InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, CanFail0,
MaxSolns0, [Case | Cases], Detism, Msgs) :-
% Technically, we should update the instmap to reflect the
% knowledge that the var is bound to this particular
% constructor, but we wouldn't use that information here anyway,
% so we don't bother.
Case0 = case(ConsId, Goal0),
det_infer_goal(Goal0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo,
Goal, Detism1, Msgs1),
Case = case(ConsId, Goal),
determinism_components(Detism1, CanFail1, MaxSolns1),
det_switch_canfail(CanFail0, CanFail1, CanFail2),
det_switch_maxsoln(MaxSolns0, MaxSolns1, MaxSolns2),
det_infer_switch(Cases0, InstMap0, SolnContext, DetInfo, CanFail2,
MaxSolns2, Cases, Detism, Msgs2),
list__append(Msgs1, Msgs2, Msgs).
% Deconstruction unifications are deterministic if the type
% only has one constructor, or if the variable is known to be
% already bound to the appropriate functor.
%
% This is handled (modulo bugs) by modes.m, which sets
% the determinism field in the deconstruct(...) to semidet for
% those deconstruction unifications which might fail.
% But switch_detection.m may set it back to det again, if it moves
% the functor test into a switch instead.
:- pred det_infer_unify(unification, determinism).
:- mode det_infer_unify(in, out) is det.
det_infer_unify(deconstruct(_, _, _, _, CanFail), Detism) :-
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, at_most_one).
det_infer_unify(assign(_, _), det).
det_infer_unify(construct(_, _, _, _), det).
det_infer_unify(simple_test(_, _), semidet).
det_infer_unify(complicated_unify(_, CanFail, _), Detism) :-
determinism_components(Detism, CanFail, at_most_one).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_zero, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_one, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_many_cc, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_many, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_zero, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_one, at_most_one).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_zero, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_one, at_most_many_cc).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_many, at_most_many_cc).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_zero, at_most_zero).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_one, at_most_many).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_conjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_conjunction_canfail(can_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
det_conjunction_canfail(can_fail, cannot_fail, can_fail).
det_conjunction_canfail(cannot_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
det_conjunction_canfail(cannot_fail, cannot_fail, cannot_fail).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_zero, at_most_zero).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_one, at_most_one).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_zero, at_most_one).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_one, at_most_many).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_zero, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_one, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_many, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_zero, at_most_many).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_one, at_most_many).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_disjunction_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_disjunction_canfail(can_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
det_disjunction_canfail(can_fail, cannot_fail, cannot_fail).
det_disjunction_canfail(cannot_fail, can_fail, cannot_fail).
det_disjunction_canfail(cannot_fail, cannot_fail, cannot_fail).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_zero, at_most_zero).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_one, at_most_one).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_zero, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_zero, at_most_one).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_one, at_most_one).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_one, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_zero, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_one, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many_cc, at_most_many, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_zero, at_most_many).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_one, at_most_many).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_many_cc, at_most_many_cc).
det_switch_maxsoln(at_most_many, at_most_many, at_most_many).
det_switch_canfail(can_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
det_switch_canfail(can_fail, cannot_fail, can_fail).
det_switch_canfail(cannot_fail, can_fail, can_fail).
det_switch_canfail(cannot_fail, cannot_fail, cannot_fail).
det_negation_det(det, yes(failure)).
det_negation_det(semidet, yes(semidet)).
det_negation_det(multidet, no).
det_negation_det(nondet, no).
det_negation_det(cc_multidet, no).
det_negation_det(cc_nondet, no).
det_negation_det(erroneous, yes(erroneous)).
det_negation_det(failure, yes(det)).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
% determinism_declarations takes a module_info as input and
% returns two lists of procedure ids, the first being those
% with determinism declarations, and the second being those without.
:- pred determinism_declarations(module_info, pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list).
:- mode determinism_declarations(in, out, out) is det.
determinism_declarations(ModuleInfo, DeclaredProcs, UndeclaredProcs) :-
get_all_pred_procs(ModuleInfo, PredProcs),
segregate_procs(ModuleInfo, PredProcs, DeclaredProcs, UndeclaredProcs).
% get_all_pred_procs takes a module_info and returns a list
% of all the procedures ids for that module.
:- pred get_all_pred_procs(module_info, pred_proc_list).
:- mode get_all_pred_procs(in, out) is det.
get_all_pred_procs(ModuleInfo, PredProcs) :-
module_info_predids(ModuleInfo, PredIds),
module_info_preds(ModuleInfo, Preds),
get_all_pred_procs_2(Preds, PredIds, [], PredProcs).
:- pred get_all_pred_procs_2(pred_table, list(pred_id),
pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list).
:- mode get_all_pred_procs_2(in, in, in, out) is det.
get_all_pred_procs_2(_Preds, [], PredProcs, PredProcs).
get_all_pred_procs_2(Preds, [PredId|PredIds], PredProcs0, PredProcs) :-
map__lookup(Preds, PredId, Pred),
pred_info_non_imported_procids(Pred, ProcIds),
fold_pred_modes(PredId, ProcIds, PredProcs0, PredProcs1),
get_all_pred_procs_2(Preds, PredIds, PredProcs1, PredProcs).
:- pred fold_pred_modes(pred_id, list(proc_id), pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list).
:- mode fold_pred_modes(in, in, in, out) is det.
fold_pred_modes(_PredId, [], PredProcs, PredProcs).
fold_pred_modes(PredId, [ProcId|ProcIds], PredProcs0, PredProcs) :-
fold_pred_modes(PredId, ProcIds, [proc(PredId, ProcId) | PredProcs0],
PredProcs).
% segregate_procs(ModuleInfo, PredProcs, DeclaredProcs, UndeclaredProcs)
% splits the list of procedures PredProcs into DeclaredProcs and
% UndeclaredProcs.
:- pred segregate_procs(module_info, pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list,
pred_proc_list).
:- mode segregate_procs(in, in, out, out) is det.
segregate_procs(ModuleInfo, PredProcs, DeclaredProcs, UndeclaredProcs) :-
segregate_procs_2(ModuleInfo, PredProcs, [], DeclaredProcs,
[], UndeclaredProcs).
:- pred segregate_procs_2(module_info, pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list,
pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list, pred_proc_list).
:- mode segregate_procs_2(in, in, in, out, in, out) is det.
segregate_procs_2(_ModuleInfo, [], DeclaredProcs, DeclaredProcs,
UndeclaredProcs, UndeclaredProcs).
segregate_procs_2(ModuleInfo, [proc(PredId, ProcId) | PredProcs],
DeclaredProcs0, DeclaredProcs,
UndeclaredProcs0, UndeclaredProcs) :-
module_info_preds(ModuleInfo, Preds),
map__lookup(Preds, PredId, Pred),
pred_info_procedures(Pred, Procs),
map__lookup(Procs, ProcId, Proc),
proc_info_declared_determinism(Proc, MaybeDetism),
(
MaybeDetism = no,
UndeclaredProcs1 = [proc(PredId, ProcId) | UndeclaredProcs0],
DeclaredProcs1 = DeclaredProcs0
;
MaybeDetism = yes(_),
DeclaredProcs1 = [proc(PredId, ProcId) | DeclaredProcs0],
UndeclaredProcs1 = UndeclaredProcs0
),
segregate_procs_2(ModuleInfo, PredProcs, DeclaredProcs1, DeclaredProcs,
UndeclaredProcs1, UndeclaredProcs).
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%