mirror of
https://github.com/Mercury-Language/mercury.git
synced 2025-12-15 13:55:07 +00:00
Estimated hours taken: 2 Branches: main compiler/*.m: Import only one compiler module per line. Sort the blocks of imports. This makes it easier to merge in changes. In a couple of places, remove unnecessary imports.
351 lines
12 KiB
Mathematica
351 lines
12 KiB
Mathematica
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Copyright (C) 1994-2003 The University of Melbourne.
|
|
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
|
|
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%
|
|
% File: switch_gen.m
|
|
% Authors: conway, fjh, zs
|
|
%
|
|
% This module handles the generation of code for switches, which are
|
|
% disjunctions that do not require backtracking. Switches are detected
|
|
% in switch_detection.m. This is the module that determines what
|
|
% sort of indexing to use for each switch and then actually generates the
|
|
% code.
|
|
%
|
|
% Currently the following forms of indexing are used:
|
|
%
|
|
% For switches on atomic data types (int, char, enums),
|
|
% if the cases are not sparse, we use the value of the switch variable
|
|
% to index into a jump table.
|
|
%
|
|
% If all the alternative goals for a switch on an atomic data type
|
|
% contain only construction unifications of constants, then we generate
|
|
% a dense lookup table (an array) for each output variable of the switch,
|
|
% rather than a dense jump table, so that executing the switch becomes
|
|
% a matter of doing an array index for each output variable - avoiding
|
|
% the branch overhead of the jump-table.
|
|
%
|
|
% For switches on discriminated union types, we generate code that does
|
|
% indexing first on the primary tag, and then on the secondary tag (if
|
|
% the primary tag is shared between several function symbols). The
|
|
% indexing code for switches on both primary and secondary tags can be
|
|
% in the form of a try-me-else chain, a try chain, a dense jump table
|
|
% or a binary search.
|
|
%
|
|
% For switches on strings, we lookup the address to jump to in a
|
|
% hash table, using open addressing to resolve hash collisions.
|
|
%
|
|
% For all other cases (or if the --smart-indexing option was
|
|
% disabled), we just generate a chain of if-then-elses.
|
|
%
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- module ll_backend__switch_gen.
|
|
|
|
:- interface.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module backend_libs__code_model.
|
|
:- import_module hlds__hlds_data.
|
|
:- import_module hlds__hlds_goal.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__code_info.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__llds.
|
|
:- import_module parse_tree__prog_data.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module list.
|
|
|
|
:- pred switch_gen__generate_switch(code_model, prog_var, can_fail, list(case),
|
|
hlds_goal_info, code_tree, code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode switch_gen__generate_switch(in, in, in, in, in, out, in, out)
|
|
is det.
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- implementation.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module backend_libs__switch_util.
|
|
:- import_module check_hlds__type_util.
|
|
:- import_module hlds__hlds_llds.
|
|
:- import_module libs__globals.
|
|
:- import_module libs__options.
|
|
:- import_module libs__tree.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__code_aux.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__code_gen.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__code_util.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__dense_switch.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__lookup_switch.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__string_switch.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__tag_switch.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__trace.
|
|
:- import_module ll_backend__unify_gen.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module bool, int, string, map, std_util, require.
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% Choose which method to use to generate the switch.
|
|
% CanFail says whether the switch covers all cases.
|
|
|
|
switch_gen__generate_switch(CodeModel, CaseVar, CanFail, Cases, GoalInfo,
|
|
Code) -->
|
|
{ goal_info_get_store_map(GoalInfo, StoreMap) },
|
|
switch_gen__determine_category(CaseVar, SwitchCategory),
|
|
code_info__get_next_label(EndLabel),
|
|
switch_gen__lookup_tags(Cases, CaseVar, TaggedCases0),
|
|
{ list__sort_and_remove_dups(TaggedCases0, TaggedCases) },
|
|
code_info__get_globals(Globals),
|
|
{ globals__lookup_bool_option(Globals, smart_indexing,
|
|
Indexing) },
|
|
(
|
|
% Check for a switch on a type whose representation
|
|
% uses reserved addresses
|
|
{ list__member(Case, TaggedCases) },
|
|
{ Case = case(_Priority, Tag, _ConsId, _Goal) },
|
|
{
|
|
Tag = reserved_address(_)
|
|
;
|
|
Tag = shared_with_reserved_addresses(_, _)
|
|
}
|
|
->
|
|
% XXX This may be be inefficient in some cases.
|
|
switch_gen__generate_all_cases(TaggedCases, CaseVar, CodeModel,
|
|
CanFail, GoalInfo, EndLabel, no, MaybeEnd, Code)
|
|
;
|
|
{ Indexing = yes },
|
|
{ SwitchCategory = atomic_switch },
|
|
code_info__get_maybe_trace_info(MaybeTraceInfo),
|
|
{ MaybeTraceInfo = no },
|
|
{ list__length(TaggedCases, NumCases) },
|
|
{ globals__lookup_int_option(Globals, lookup_switch_size,
|
|
LookupSize) },
|
|
{ NumCases >= LookupSize },
|
|
{ globals__lookup_int_option(Globals, lookup_switch_req_density,
|
|
ReqDensity) },
|
|
lookup_switch__is_lookup_switch(CaseVar, TaggedCases, GoalInfo,
|
|
CanFail, ReqDensity, StoreMap, no, MaybeEndPrime,
|
|
CodeModel, FirstVal, LastVal, NeedRangeCheck,
|
|
NeedBitVecCheck, OutVars, CaseVals, MLiveness)
|
|
->
|
|
{ MaybeEnd = MaybeEndPrime },
|
|
lookup_switch__generate(CaseVar, OutVars, CaseVals,
|
|
FirstVal, LastVal, NeedRangeCheck, NeedBitVecCheck,
|
|
MLiveness, StoreMap, no, Code)
|
|
;
|
|
{ Indexing = yes },
|
|
{ SwitchCategory = atomic_switch },
|
|
{ list__length(TaggedCases, NumCases) },
|
|
{ globals__lookup_int_option(Globals, dense_switch_size,
|
|
DenseSize) },
|
|
{ NumCases >= DenseSize },
|
|
{ globals__lookup_int_option(Globals, dense_switch_req_density,
|
|
ReqDensity) },
|
|
dense_switch__is_dense_switch(CaseVar, TaggedCases, CanFail,
|
|
ReqDensity, FirstVal, LastVal, CanFail1)
|
|
->
|
|
dense_switch__generate(TaggedCases,
|
|
FirstVal, LastVal, CaseVar, CodeModel, CanFail1,
|
|
GoalInfo, EndLabel, no, MaybeEnd, Code)
|
|
;
|
|
{ Indexing = yes },
|
|
{ SwitchCategory = string_switch },
|
|
{ list__length(TaggedCases, NumCases) },
|
|
{ globals__lookup_int_option(Globals, string_switch_size,
|
|
StringSize) },
|
|
{ NumCases >= StringSize }
|
|
->
|
|
string_switch__generate(TaggedCases, CaseVar, CodeModel,
|
|
CanFail, GoalInfo, EndLabel, no, MaybeEnd, Code)
|
|
;
|
|
{ Indexing = yes },
|
|
{ SwitchCategory = tag_switch },
|
|
{ list__length(TaggedCases, NumCases) },
|
|
{ globals__lookup_int_option(Globals, tag_switch_size,
|
|
TagSize) },
|
|
{ NumCases >= TagSize }
|
|
->
|
|
tag_switch__generate(TaggedCases, CaseVar, CodeModel, CanFail,
|
|
GoalInfo, EndLabel, no, MaybeEnd, Code)
|
|
;
|
|
% To generate a switch, first we flush the
|
|
% variable on whose tag we are going to switch, then we
|
|
% generate the cases for the switch.
|
|
|
|
switch_gen__generate_all_cases(TaggedCases, CaseVar,
|
|
CodeModel, CanFail, GoalInfo, EndLabel, no, MaybeEnd,
|
|
Code)
|
|
),
|
|
code_info__after_all_branches(StoreMap, MaybeEnd).
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% We categorize switches according to whether the value
|
|
% being switched on is an atomic type, a string, or
|
|
% something more complicated.
|
|
|
|
:- pred switch_gen__determine_category(prog_var, switch_category,
|
|
code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode switch_gen__determine_category(in, out, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
switch_gen__determine_category(CaseVar, SwitchCategory) -->
|
|
code_info__variable_type(CaseVar, Type),
|
|
code_info__get_module_info(ModuleInfo),
|
|
{ classify_type(Type, ModuleInfo, TypeCategory) },
|
|
{ switch_util__type_cat_to_switch_cat(TypeCategory, SwitchCategory) }.
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- pred switch_gen__lookup_tags(list(case), prog_var, cases_list,
|
|
code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode switch_gen__lookup_tags(in, in, out, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
switch_gen__lookup_tags([], _, []) --> [].
|
|
switch_gen__lookup_tags([Case | Cases], Var, [TaggedCase | TaggedCases]) -->
|
|
{ Case = case(ConsId, Goal) },
|
|
code_info__cons_id_to_tag(Var, ConsId, Tag),
|
|
{ switch_util__switch_priority(Tag, Priority) },
|
|
{ TaggedCase = case(Priority, Tag, ConsId, Goal) },
|
|
switch_gen__lookup_tags(Cases, Var, TaggedCases).
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% Generate a switch as a chain of if-then-elses.
|
|
%
|
|
% To generate a case for a switch we generate
|
|
% code to do a tag-test and fall through to the next case in
|
|
% the event of failure.
|
|
%
|
|
% Each case except the last consists of
|
|
%
|
|
% a tag test, jumping to the next case if it fails
|
|
% the goal for that case
|
|
% code to move variables to where the store map says they
|
|
% ought to be
|
|
% a branch to the end of the switch.
|
|
%
|
|
% For the last case, if the switch covers all cases that can occur,
|
|
% we don't need to generate the tag test, and we never need to
|
|
% generate the branch to the end of the switch.
|
|
%
|
|
% After the last case, we put the end-of-switch label which other
|
|
% cases branch to after their case goals.
|
|
%
|
|
% In the important special case of a det switch with two cases,
|
|
% we try to find out which case will be executed more frequently,
|
|
% and put that one first. This minimizes the number of pipeline
|
|
% breaks caused by taken branches.
|
|
|
|
:- pred switch_gen__generate_all_cases(list(extended_case), prog_var,
|
|
code_model, can_fail, hlds_goal_info, label, branch_end, branch_end,
|
|
code_tree, code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode switch_gen__generate_all_cases(in, in, in, in, in, in, in, out, out,
|
|
in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
switch_gen__generate_all_cases(Cases0, Var, CodeModel, CanFail, GoalInfo,
|
|
EndLabel, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd, Code) -->
|
|
code_info__produce_variable(Var, VarCode, _Rval),
|
|
(
|
|
{ CodeModel = model_det },
|
|
{ CanFail = cannot_fail },
|
|
{ Cases0 = [Case1, Case2] },
|
|
{ Case1 = case(_, _, _, Goal1) },
|
|
{ Case2 = case(_, _, _, Goal2) }
|
|
->
|
|
code_info__get_pred_id(PredId),
|
|
code_info__get_proc_id(ProcId),
|
|
{ code_util__count_recursive_calls(Goal1, PredId, ProcId,
|
|
Min1, Max1) },
|
|
{ code_util__count_recursive_calls(Goal2, PredId, ProcId,
|
|
Min2, Max2) },
|
|
{
|
|
Max1 = 0, % Goal1 is a base case
|
|
Min2 = 1 % Goal2 is probably singly recursive
|
|
->
|
|
Cases = [Case2, Case1]
|
|
;
|
|
Max2 = 0, % Goal2 is a base case
|
|
Min1 > 1 % Goal1 is at least doubly recursive
|
|
->
|
|
Cases = [Case2, Case1]
|
|
;
|
|
Cases = Cases0
|
|
}
|
|
;
|
|
{ Cases = Cases0 }
|
|
),
|
|
switch_gen__generate_cases(Cases, Var, CodeModel, CanFail,
|
|
GoalInfo, EndLabel, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd, CasesCode),
|
|
{ Code = tree(VarCode, CasesCode) }.
|
|
|
|
:- pred switch_gen__generate_cases(list(extended_case), prog_var, code_model,
|
|
can_fail, hlds_goal_info, label, branch_end, branch_end, code_tree,
|
|
code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode switch_gen__generate_cases(in, in, in, in, in, in, in, out, out,
|
|
in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% At the end of a locally semidet switch, we fail because we
|
|
% came across a tag which was not covered by one of the cases.
|
|
% It is followed by the end of switch label to which the cases
|
|
% branch.
|
|
switch_gen__generate_cases([], _Var, _CodeModel, CanFail, _GoalInfo,
|
|
EndLabel, MaybeEnd, MaybeEnd, Code) -->
|
|
( { CanFail = can_fail } ->
|
|
code_info__generate_failure(FailCode)
|
|
;
|
|
{ FailCode = empty }
|
|
),
|
|
{ EndCode = node([
|
|
label(EndLabel) -
|
|
"end of switch"
|
|
]) },
|
|
{ Code = tree(FailCode, EndCode) }.
|
|
|
|
switch_gen__generate_cases([case(_, _, Cons, Goal) | Cases], Var, CodeModel,
|
|
CanFail, SwitchGoalInfo, EndLabel, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd,
|
|
CasesCode) -->
|
|
code_info__remember_position(BranchStart),
|
|
{ goal_info_get_store_map(SwitchGoalInfo, StoreMap) },
|
|
(
|
|
{ Cases = [_|_] ; CanFail = can_fail }
|
|
->
|
|
unify_gen__generate_tag_test(Var, Cons, branch_on_failure,
|
|
NextLabel, TestCode),
|
|
trace__maybe_generate_internal_event_code(Goal, SwitchGoalInfo,
|
|
TraceCode),
|
|
code_gen__generate_goal(CodeModel, Goal, GoalCode),
|
|
code_info__generate_branch_end(StoreMap, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd1,
|
|
SaveCode),
|
|
{ ElseCode = node([
|
|
goto(label(EndLabel)) -
|
|
"skip to the end of the switch",
|
|
label(NextLabel) -
|
|
"next case"
|
|
]) },
|
|
{ ThisCaseCode =
|
|
tree(TestCode,
|
|
tree(TraceCode,
|
|
tree(GoalCode,
|
|
tree(SaveCode,
|
|
ElseCode))))
|
|
}
|
|
;
|
|
trace__maybe_generate_internal_event_code(Goal, SwitchGoalInfo,
|
|
TraceCode),
|
|
code_gen__generate_goal(CodeModel, Goal, GoalCode),
|
|
code_info__generate_branch_end(StoreMap, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd1,
|
|
SaveCode),
|
|
{ ThisCaseCode =
|
|
tree(TraceCode,
|
|
tree(GoalCode,
|
|
SaveCode))
|
|
}
|
|
),
|
|
code_info__reset_to_position(BranchStart),
|
|
% generate the rest of the cases.
|
|
switch_gen__generate_cases(Cases, Var, CodeModel, CanFail,
|
|
SwitchGoalInfo, EndLabel, MaybeEnd1, MaybeEnd,
|
|
OtherCasesCode),
|
|
{ CasesCode = tree(ThisCaseCode, OtherCasesCode) }.
|
|
|
|
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|