mirror of
https://github.com/Mercury-Language/mercury.git
synced 2026-04-15 09:23:44 +00:00
compiler/unify_proc.m:
Try to optimize the code we generate for unification and comparison
predicates when a function symbol's arguments include sub-word-sized
arguments packed together into a word.
For unify predicates, generate code to test whether the two words
at the same offset in the terms being unified are equal. This works
regardless of whether the arguments are signed or unsigned.
For compare predicates, generate code to compare the two words
at the same offset in the terms being compared *if* all the arguments
in the terms being compared are unsigned. This works because we put
the earlier arguments in the more significant bit positions. But if
some of the arguments are signed, then divide the argument word
in sequences of zero or more unsigned arguments separated by signed
arguments. We then generate code that compares any contiguous sequences
of unsigned arguments in bulk, while comparing each signed field
separately.
Do the bulk unification and comparison via foreign_proc goals generated
inline. This works only when we are generating C, but this is ok because
we pack sub-word-sized arguments into a word only when generating C.
We do the comparison of signed sub-word-sized fields (int8, int16 or int32)
via foreign_proc goals generated inline as well. Doing them using unify
goals would work as well, but would be less efficient in general. This is
because having N such arguments in a function symbols requires storing
only one value across calls for each term being compared (the term itself)
when generating foreign_procs, but would require storing N values across
calls (the values of the sub-word-sized signed arguments) when generating
unifications. Generating inline foreign_procs is effectively a manual
application of the optimization implemented by saved_vars.m.
library/private_builtin.m:
Add the builtin predicates that unify_proc.m now generates calls to.
We should never need their bodies, but the compiler does need to know
the declarations of all predicates mentioned in inline foreign_procs.
configure.ac:
runtime/mercury_conf.h.in:
Define either MR_MERCURY_IS_32_BITS or MR_MERCURY_IS_64_BITS depending
on the word size. Make the configured value of MR_BITS_PER_WORD available
to C code.
mdbcomp/program_representation.m:
Register the new builtin predicates as no_typeinfo_builtins, i.e.
builtins whose arguments' types contain type variables, that nevertheless
should *not* be passed the typeinfos of the actual types bound to those
type variables.
compiler/hlds_clauses.m:
Bulk unification of arguments works only when all the arguments involved
are initially ground. The optimized unification clauses we can now generate
are thus appropriate only for <in,in> unifications. (Technically, they
*would* work for unifications for which the function symbol arguments
involved in bulk unify operations are ground even if some other arguments
are initially free, but that distinction is too hard to make, compared
to the extremely small performance gain that would be available
if we *could* make that distinction.)
Provide a way for unify_proc.m to mark a clause as being for use either
in the <in,in> modes of unifications (for the optimized version using bulk
unifications), or as in all other modes of unifications (for a version in
which that optimization has been disabled).
Replace two boolean fields in clauses_infos with bespoke types, for
greater readability and reliability. These are a remnant of a different
way to differentiate <in,in> vs non-<in,in> clauses that I ultimately
decided against. These bespoke types are independent of the main change
in this diff, but there is no reason to undo their use.
compiler/clause_to_proc.m:
When copying clauses to procedure bodies inside type-specific unify
predicates, pay attention to the markers that unify_proc.m put on
those clauses about which are for <in,in> modes and which are for
non-<in,in> modes.
To make this possible, make our callers pass us extra information.
compiler/options.m:
Add a bootstrapping option that governs whether unify_proc.m should
try to apply the new optimization.
Give an option that governs comparisons of function symbols for Erlang
a name that reflects that fact.
compiler/hlds_pred.m:
Fix a misleading predicate name.
compiler/add_class.m:
compiler/add_clause.m:
compiler/add_foreign_proc.m:
compiler/add_pragma_type_spec.m:
compiler/add_pred.m:
compiler/dead_proc_elim.m:
compiler/det_report.m:
compiler/erl_code_gen.m:
compiler/handle_options.m:
compiler/higher_order.m:
compiler/hlds_out_module.m:
compiler/hlds_out_pred.m:
compiler/hlds_statistics.m:
compiler/intermod.m:
compiler/mercury_compile_front_end.m:
compiler/ml_proc_gen.m:
compiler/modecheck_unify.m:
compiler/proc_gen.m:
compiler/proc_requests.m:
compiler/purity.m:
compiler/resolve_unify_functor.m:
compiler/structure_reuse.indirect.m:
compiler/structure_sharing.analysis.m:
compiler/tabling_analysis.m:
compiler/type_constraints.m:
compiler/typecheck.m:
compiler/unused_args.m:
Conform to the changes above.