mirror of
https://github.com/Mercury-Language/mercury.git
synced 2025-12-13 21:04:00 +00:00
Estimated hours taken: 4 Delete the `cast_to_unsigned' unary operator from builtin_ops, and replace it with an `unsigned_le' binary operator for doing unsigned less-then-or-equal comparisons. This change makes the semantics and typing of the builtin operators more consistent. compiler/builtin_ops.m: Delete the `cast_to_unsigned' unary_op. Add a new `unsigned_le' binary_op. compiler/dense_switch.m: compiler/lookup_switch.m: compiler/ml_simplify_switch.m: Use `binop(unsigned_le, X, Y)' rather than `binop(<=, unop(cast_to_unsigned, X), Y)'. compiler/bytecode.m: compiler/c_util.m: compiler/llds.m: compiler/llds_out.m: compiler/mlds_to_gcc.m: compiler/mlds_to_il.m: compiler/opt_debug.m: compiler/vn_util.m: compiler/vn_cost.m: Delete code for handling `cast_to_unsigned' and instead add code for handling `unsigned_le'. compiler/vn_cost.m: Also add `mktag' and `unmktag' as zero_cost_unops. compiler/c_util.m: Add a new procedure `c_util__unsigned_comparison_op', for use by llds_out.m.
246 lines
8.0 KiB
Mathematica
246 lines
8.0 KiB
Mathematica
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Copyright (C) 1994-2001 The University of Melbourne.
|
|
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
|
|
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% dense_switch.m
|
|
|
|
% For switches on atomic types, generate code using a dense jump table.
|
|
|
|
% Author: fjh.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- module dense_switch.
|
|
|
|
:- interface.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module prog_data, hlds_data, hlds_goal, code_model.
|
|
:- import_module switch_util, type_util.
|
|
:- import_module llds, code_info.
|
|
|
|
% Should this switch be implemented as a dense jump table?
|
|
% If so, we return the starting and ending values for the table,
|
|
% and whether the switch is not covers all cases or not
|
|
% (we may convert locally semidet switches into locally det
|
|
% switches by adding extra cases whose body is just `fail').
|
|
|
|
:- pred dense_switch__is_dense_switch(prog_var, cases_list, can_fail, int,
|
|
int, int, can_fail, code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode dense_switch__is_dense_switch(in, in, in, in, out, out, out, in, out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% Generate code for a switch using a dense jump table.
|
|
|
|
:- pred dense_switch__generate(cases_list, int, int, prog_var, code_model,
|
|
can_fail, store_map, label, branch_end, branch_end, code_tree,
|
|
code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode dense_switch__generate(in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in,
|
|
in, out, out, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% also used by lookup_switch
|
|
:- pred dense_switch__calc_density(int, int, int).
|
|
:- mode dense_switch__calc_density(in, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% also used by lookup_switch
|
|
:- pred dense_switch__type_range(builtin_type, type, int, code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode dense_switch__type_range(in, in, out, in, out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- implementation.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module builtin_ops, hlds_module, code_gen, trace.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module char, map, tree, int, std_util, require, list.
|
|
|
|
dense_switch__is_dense_switch(CaseVar, TaggedCases, CanFail0, ReqDensity,
|
|
FirstVal, LastVal, CanFail) -->
|
|
{
|
|
list__length(TaggedCases, NumCases),
|
|
NumCases > 2,
|
|
TaggedCases = [FirstCase | _],
|
|
FirstCase = case(_, int_constant(FirstCaseVal), _, _),
|
|
list__index1_det(TaggedCases, NumCases, LastCase),
|
|
LastCase = case(_, int_constant(LastCaseVal), _, _),
|
|
Span is LastCaseVal - FirstCaseVal,
|
|
Range is Span + 1,
|
|
dense_switch__calc_density(NumCases, Range, Density),
|
|
Density > ReqDensity
|
|
},
|
|
( { CanFail0 = can_fail } ->
|
|
% For semidet switches, we normally need to check that
|
|
% the variable is in range before we index into the jump table.
|
|
% However, if the range of the type is sufficiently small,
|
|
% we can make the jump table large enough to hold all
|
|
% of the values for the type.
|
|
code_info__variable_type(CaseVar, Type),
|
|
code_info__get_module_info(ModuleInfo),
|
|
{ classify_type(Type, ModuleInfo, TypeCategory) },
|
|
(
|
|
dense_switch__type_range(TypeCategory, Type, TypeRange),
|
|
{ dense_switch__calc_density(NumCases, TypeRange,
|
|
DetDensity) },
|
|
{ DetDensity > ReqDensity }
|
|
->
|
|
{ CanFail = cannot_fail },
|
|
{ FirstVal = 0 },
|
|
{ LastVal is TypeRange - 1 }
|
|
;
|
|
{ CanFail = CanFail0 },
|
|
{ FirstVal = FirstCaseVal },
|
|
{ LastVal = LastCaseVal }
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
{ CanFail = CanFail0 },
|
|
{ FirstVal = FirstCaseVal },
|
|
{ LastVal = LastCaseVal }
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% Calculate the percentage density given the range
|
|
% and the number of cases.
|
|
|
|
dense_switch__calc_density(NumCases, Range, Density) :-
|
|
N1 is NumCases * 100,
|
|
Density is N1 // Range.
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% Determine the range of an atomic type.
|
|
% Fail if the type isn't the sort of type that has a range
|
|
% or if the type's range is to big to switch on (e.g. int).
|
|
|
|
dense_switch__type_range(TypeCategory, Type, Range) -->
|
|
code_info__get_module_info(ModuleInfo),
|
|
{ switch_util__type_range(TypeCategory, Type, ModuleInfo,
|
|
Min, Max) },
|
|
{ Range = Max - Min + 1 }.
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
dense_switch__generate(Cases, StartVal, EndVal, Var, CodeModel, CanFail,
|
|
StoreMap, EndLabel, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd, Code) -->
|
|
% Evaluate the variable which we are going to be switching on
|
|
code_info__produce_variable(Var, VarCode, Rval),
|
|
% If the case values start at some number other than 0,
|
|
% then subtract that number to give us a zero-based index
|
|
{ StartVal = 0 ->
|
|
Index = Rval
|
|
;
|
|
Index = binop(-, Rval, const(int_const(StartVal)))
|
|
},
|
|
% If the switch is not locally deterministic, we need to
|
|
% check that the value of the variable lies within the
|
|
% appropriate range
|
|
(
|
|
{ CanFail = can_fail },
|
|
{ Difference is EndVal - StartVal },
|
|
code_info__fail_if_rval_is_false(
|
|
binop(unsigned_le, Index,
|
|
const(int_const(Difference))), RangeCheck)
|
|
;
|
|
{ CanFail = cannot_fail },
|
|
{ RangeCheck = empty }
|
|
),
|
|
% Now generate the jump table and the cases
|
|
dense_switch__generate_cases(Cases, StartVal, EndVal, CodeModel,
|
|
StoreMap, EndLabel, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd,
|
|
Labels, CasesCode),
|
|
% XXX
|
|
% We keep track of the code_info at the end of one of
|
|
% the non-fail cases. We have to do this because
|
|
% generating a `fail' slot last would yield the
|
|
% wrong liveness and would not unset the failure cont
|
|
% for a nondet switch.
|
|
{ DoJump = node([
|
|
computed_goto(Index, Labels)
|
|
- "switch (using dense jump table)"
|
|
]) },
|
|
% Assemble the code together
|
|
{ Code = tree(VarCode, tree(RangeCheck, tree(DoJump, CasesCode))) }.
|
|
|
|
:- pred dense_switch__generate_cases(cases_list, int, int,
|
|
code_model, store_map, label, branch_end, branch_end,
|
|
list(label), code_tree, code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode dense_switch__generate_cases(in, in, in, in, in, in, in, out,
|
|
out, out, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
dense_switch__generate_cases(Cases0, NextVal, EndVal, CodeModel, StoreMap,
|
|
EndLabel, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd, Labels, Code) -->
|
|
(
|
|
{ NextVal > EndVal }
|
|
->
|
|
{ MaybeEnd = MaybeEnd0 },
|
|
{ Labels = [] },
|
|
{ Code = node([
|
|
label(EndLabel)
|
|
- "End of dense switch"
|
|
]) }
|
|
;
|
|
code_info__get_next_label(ThisLabel),
|
|
dense_switch__generate_case(Cases0, NextVal, CodeModel,
|
|
StoreMap, Cases1, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd1,
|
|
ThisCode, Comment),
|
|
{ LabelCode = node([
|
|
label(ThisLabel)
|
|
- Comment
|
|
]) },
|
|
{ JumpCode = node([
|
|
goto(label(EndLabel))
|
|
- "branch to end of dense switch"
|
|
]) },
|
|
% generate the rest of the cases.
|
|
{ NextVal1 is NextVal + 1 },
|
|
dense_switch__generate_cases(Cases1, NextVal1, EndVal,
|
|
CodeModel, StoreMap, EndLabel, MaybeEnd1, MaybeEnd,
|
|
Labels1, OtherCasesCode),
|
|
{ Labels = [ThisLabel | Labels1] },
|
|
{ Code =
|
|
tree(LabelCode,
|
|
tree(ThisCode,
|
|
tree(JumpCode,
|
|
OtherCasesCode)))
|
|
}
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%---------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- pred dense_switch__generate_case(cases_list, int, code_model, store_map,
|
|
cases_list, branch_end, branch_end, code_tree, string,
|
|
code_info, code_info).
|
|
:- mode dense_switch__generate_case(in, in, in, in, out, in, out, out, out,
|
|
in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
dense_switch__generate_case(Cases0, NextVal, CodeModel, StoreMap, Cases,
|
|
MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd, Code, Comment) -->
|
|
(
|
|
{ Cases0 = [Case | Cases1] },
|
|
{ Case = case(_, int_constant(NextVal), _, Goal) }
|
|
->
|
|
{ Comment = "case of dense switch" },
|
|
% We need to save the expression cache, etc.,
|
|
% and restore them when we've finished.
|
|
code_info__remember_position(BranchStart),
|
|
trace__maybe_generate_internal_event_code(Goal, TraceCode),
|
|
code_gen__generate_goal(CodeModel, Goal, GoalCode),
|
|
code_info__generate_branch_end(StoreMap, MaybeEnd0, MaybeEnd,
|
|
SaveCode),
|
|
{ Code =
|
|
tree(TraceCode,
|
|
tree(GoalCode,
|
|
SaveCode))
|
|
},
|
|
code_info__reset_to_position(BranchStart),
|
|
{ Cases = Cases1 }
|
|
;
|
|
% This case didn't occur in the original case list
|
|
% - just generate a `fail' for it.
|
|
{ Comment = "compiler-introduced `fail' case of dense switch" },
|
|
code_info__generate_failure(Code),
|
|
{ MaybeEnd = MaybeEnd0 },
|
|
{ Cases = Cases0 }
|
|
).
|