mirror of
https://github.com/Mercury-Language/mercury.git
synced 2025-12-18 15:26:31 +00:00
configure.in:
Add a test to find the number of words needed to represent a
synchronization term.
boehm_gc/gc.h:
fix a declaration by replacing the args () with (void).
boehm_gc/solaris_pthreads.c:
add a missing include
check the return values of pthread calls.
compiler/*.m:
Add handling for the new HLDS goal type par_conj.
Add handling for the four new LLDS instructions:
init_sync_term
fork
join_and_terminate
join_and_continue
compiler/code_info.m:
add a new alternative for slot_contents - sync_term.
compiler/handle_options.m:
add .par as part of the grade
compiler/hlds_goal.m:
add the new goal type par_conj.
compiler/instmap.m:
add instmap__unify which takes a list of instmaps
and abstractly unifies them.
add unify_instmap_delta which tajes two instmap deltas
and abstractly unifies them.
compiler/llds.m:
add the new llds instructions.
compiler/mode_info.m:
add par_conj as a lock reason.
library/Makefile:
work around a bug in the solaris version pthread.h
library/benchmarking.m:
reference the stack zones from the engine structure
rather than from global variables.
library/{nc,sp}_builtin.nl:
add an op declaration for &.
library/std_util.m:
change references to global variables to references inside
the engine structure.
runtime/Mmakefile:
add mercury_thread.{c,h}
add THREADLIBS to the libraries
runtime/*.{c,h}
Remove some old junk from the previous processes/shrd-mem
changes that found their way into the repository.
Add MR_ prefixes to lots of names.
runtime/mercury_context.c:
Add init_thread_stuff for creating and initializing a
context structure for the current thread.
runtime/mercury_context.h:
add a field to the mercury context which stores the thread id
of the thread where this context originated.
add various macros for implementing the new llds instructions.
runtime/mercury_engine.c:
initialize the engine structure, rather than a bunch of globals.
runtime/mercury_engine.h:
declare the mercury_engine structure.
runtime/mercury_regorder.h:
if MR_THREAD_SAFE, and there is at least one global register
then use mr0 as a pointer to the mercury engine structure.
scripts/init_grade_options.sh-subr
add thread_safe
scripts/mgnuc.in
add THREAD_OPTS
scripts/ml.in:
add THREAD_LIBS
694 lines
27 KiB
Mathematica
694 lines
27 KiB
Mathematica
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Copyright (C) 1997-1998 The University of Melbourne.
|
|
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
|
|
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%
|
|
% File : purity.m
|
|
% Authors : pets (Peter Schachte)
|
|
% Purpose : handle `impure' and `promise_pure' declarations;
|
|
% finish off type checking.
|
|
%
|
|
% The main purpose of this module is check the consistency of the
|
|
% `impure' and `promise_pure' (etc.) declarations, and to thus report
|
|
% error messages if the program is not "purity-correct".
|
|
%
|
|
% This module also does two final parts of type analysis:
|
|
% - it resolves predicate overloading
|
|
% (perhaps it ought to also resolve function overloading,
|
|
% converting unifications that are function calls into
|
|
% HLDS call instructions, but currently that is still done
|
|
% in modecheck_unify.m)
|
|
% - it checks for unbound type variables and if there are any,
|
|
% it reports an error (or a warning, binding them to the type `void').
|
|
% These actions cannot be done until after type inference is complete,
|
|
% so they need to be a separate "post-typecheck pass"; they are done
|
|
% here in combination with the purity-analysis pass for efficiency reasons.
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
% The aim of Mercury's purity system is to allow one to declare certain parts
|
|
% of one's program to be impure, thereby forbidding the compiler from making
|
|
% certain optimizations to that part of the code. Since one can often
|
|
% implement a perfectly pure predicate or function in terms of impure
|
|
% predicates and functions, one is also allowed to promise to the compiler
|
|
% that a predicate *is* pure, despite calling impure predicates and
|
|
% functions.
|
|
%
|
|
% To keep purity/impurity consistent, it is required that every impure
|
|
% predicate/function be declared so. A predicate is impure if:
|
|
%
|
|
% 1. It's declared impure, or
|
|
% 2a. It's not promised pure, and
|
|
% 2b. It calls some impure predicates or functions.
|
|
%
|
|
% A predicate or function is declared impure by preceding the `pred' or
|
|
% `func' in its declaration with `impure'. It is promised to be pure with a
|
|
%
|
|
% :- pragma promise_pure(Name/Arity).
|
|
%
|
|
% directive.
|
|
%
|
|
% Calls to impure predicates may not be optimized away. Neither may they be
|
|
% reodered relative to any other goals in a given conjunction; ie, an impure
|
|
% goal cleaves a conjunction into the stuff before it and the stuff after it.
|
|
% Both of these groups may be reordered separately, but no goal from either
|
|
% group may move into the other. Similarly for disjunctions.
|
|
%
|
|
% Semipure goals are goals that are sensitive to the effects of impure goals.
|
|
% They may be reordered and optimized away just like pure goals, except that
|
|
% a semipure goal may behave differently after a call to an impure goal than
|
|
% before. This means that semipure (as well as impure) predicates must not
|
|
% be tabled. Further, duplicate semipure goals on different sides of an
|
|
% impure goal must not be optimized away. In the current implementation, we
|
|
% simply do not optimize away duplicate semipure (or impure) goals at all.
|
|
%
|
|
% A predicate either has no purity declaration and so is assumed pure, or is
|
|
% declared semipure or impure, or is promised to be pure despite calling
|
|
% semipure or impure predicates. This promise cannot be checked, so we must
|
|
% trust the programmer.
|
|
%
|
|
% XXX The current implementation doesn't handle impure functions. The main
|
|
% reason is that handling of nested functions is likely to get pretty
|
|
% confusing. Because impure functions can't be reordered, the execution
|
|
% order would have to be strictly innermost-first, left-to-right, and
|
|
% predicate arguments would always have to be evaluated before the
|
|
% predicate call. Implied modes are right out. All in all, they just
|
|
% won't be as natural as one might think at first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- module purity.
|
|
:- interface.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module hlds_module, hlds_goal.
|
|
:- import_module io.
|
|
|
|
:- type purity ---> pure
|
|
; (semipure)
|
|
; (impure).
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Purity check a whole module.
|
|
:- pred puritycheck(module_info, module_info, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode puritycheck(in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Sort of a "maximum" for impurity.
|
|
:- pred worst_purity(purity, purity, purity).
|
|
:- mode worst_purity(in, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Compare two purities.
|
|
:- pred less_pure(purity, purity).
|
|
:- mode less_pure(in, in) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% Print out a purity name.
|
|
:- pred write_purity(purity, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode write_purity(in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Print out a purity prefix.
|
|
% This works under the assumptions that all purity names but `pure' are prefix
|
|
% Operators, and that we never need `pure' indicators/declarations.
|
|
:- pred write_purity_prefix(purity, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode write_purity_prefix(in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Get a purity name as a string.
|
|
:- pred purity_name(purity, string).
|
|
:- mode purity_name(in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Update a goal info to reflect the specified purity
|
|
:- pred add_goal_info_purity_feature(hlds_goal_info, purity, hlds_goal_info).
|
|
:- mode add_goal_info_purity_feature(in, in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Determine the purity of a goal from its hlds_goal_info.
|
|
:- pred infer_goal_info_purity(hlds_goal_info, purity).
|
|
:- mode infer_goal_info_purity(in, out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Check if a hlds_goal_info is for a pure goal
|
|
:- pred goal_info_is_pure(hlds_goal_info).
|
|
:- mode goal_info_is_pure(in) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% Check if a hlds_goal_info is for an impure goal. Fails if the goal is
|
|
% semipure, so this isn't the same as \+ goal_info_is_pure.
|
|
:- pred goal_info_is_impure(hlds_goal_info).
|
|
:- mode goal_info_is_impure(in) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
:- implementation.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module make_hlds, hlds_data, hlds_pred, prog_io_util.
|
|
:- import_module type_util, mode_util, code_util, prog_data, unify_proc.
|
|
:- import_module globals, options, mercury_to_mercury, hlds_out.
|
|
:- import_module passes_aux, typecheck, module_qual, clause_to_proc.
|
|
:- import_module modecheck_unify, modecheck_call, inst_util, prog_out.
|
|
:- import_module post_typecheck.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module list, map, varset, term, string, require, std_util.
|
|
:- import_module assoc_list, bool, int, set.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Public Predicates
|
|
|
|
|
|
puritycheck(HLDS0, HLDS) -->
|
|
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(statistics, Statistics),
|
|
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(verbose, Verbose),
|
|
io__stderr_stream(StdErr),
|
|
io__set_output_stream(StdErr, OldStream),
|
|
|
|
maybe_write_string(Verbose, "% Purity-checking clauses...\n"),
|
|
check_preds_purity(HLDS0, HLDS),
|
|
maybe_report_stats(Statistics),
|
|
|
|
io__set_output_stream(OldStream, _).
|
|
|
|
|
|
% worst_purity/3 could be written more compactly, but this definition
|
|
% guarantees us a determinism error if we add to type `purity'. We also
|
|
% define less_pure/2 in terms of worst_purity/3 rather than the other way
|
|
% around for the same reason.
|
|
|
|
worst_purity(pure, pure, pure).
|
|
worst_purity(pure, (semipure), (semipure)).
|
|
worst_purity(pure, (impure), (impure)).
|
|
worst_purity((semipure), pure, (semipure)).
|
|
worst_purity((semipure), (semipure), (semipure)).
|
|
worst_purity((semipure), (impure), (impure)).
|
|
worst_purity((impure), pure, (impure)).
|
|
worst_purity((impure), (semipure), (impure)).
|
|
worst_purity((impure), (impure), (impure)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
less_pure(P1, P2) :-
|
|
\+ worst_purity(P1, P2, P2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
add_goal_info_purity_feature(GoalInfo0, pure, GoalInfo) :-
|
|
goal_info_remove_feature(GoalInfo0, (semipure), GoalInfo1),
|
|
goal_info_remove_feature(GoalInfo1, (impure), GoalInfo).
|
|
add_goal_info_purity_feature(GoalInfo0, (semipure), GoalInfo) :-
|
|
goal_info_add_feature(GoalInfo0, (semipure), GoalInfo).
|
|
add_goal_info_purity_feature(GoalInfo0, (impure), GoalInfo) :-
|
|
goal_info_add_feature(GoalInfo0, (impure), GoalInfo).
|
|
|
|
|
|
infer_goal_info_purity(GoalInfo, Purity) :-
|
|
(
|
|
goal_info_has_feature(GoalInfo, (impure)) ->
|
|
Purity = (impure)
|
|
;
|
|
goal_info_has_feature(GoalInfo, (semipure)) ->
|
|
Purity = (semipure)
|
|
;
|
|
Purity = pure
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
goal_info_is_pure(GoalInfo) :-
|
|
\+ goal_info_has_feature(GoalInfo, (impure)),
|
|
\+ goal_info_has_feature(GoalInfo, (semipure)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
goal_info_is_impure(GoalInfo) :-
|
|
goal_info_has_feature(GoalInfo, (impure)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
% this works under the assumptions that all purity names but `pure' are prefix
|
|
% operators, and that we never need `pure' indicators/declarations.
|
|
|
|
write_purity_prefix(Purity) -->
|
|
( { Purity = pure } ->
|
|
[]
|
|
;
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string(" ")
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
write_purity(Purity) -->
|
|
{ purity_name(Purity, String) },
|
|
io__write_string(String).
|
|
|
|
purity_name(pure, "pure").
|
|
purity_name((semipure), "semipure").
|
|
purity_name((impure), "impure").
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Purity-check the code for all the predicates in a module
|
|
|
|
:- pred check_preds_purity(module_info, module_info, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode check_preds_purity(in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
check_preds_purity(ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo) -->
|
|
{ module_info_predids(ModuleInfo0, PredIds) },
|
|
check_preds_purity_2(PredIds, ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo1, 0, NumErrors),
|
|
{ module_info_num_errors(ModuleInfo1, Errs0) },
|
|
{ Errs is Errs0 + NumErrors },
|
|
{ module_info_set_num_errors(ModuleInfo1, Errs, ModuleInfo) }.
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred check_preds_purity_2(list(pred_id), module_info, module_info,
|
|
int, int, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode check_preds_purity_2(in, in, out, in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
check_preds_purity_2([], ModuleInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
NumErrors, NumErrors) --> [].
|
|
check_preds_purity_2([PredId | PredIds], ModuleInfo0, ModuleInfo,
|
|
NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ module_info_preds(ModuleInfo0, Preds0) },
|
|
{ map__lookup(Preds0, PredId, PredInfo0) },
|
|
(
|
|
{ pred_info_is_imported(PredInfo0)
|
|
; pred_info_is_pseudo_imported(PredInfo0) }
|
|
->
|
|
post_typecheck__finish_imported_pred(ModuleInfo0, PredId,
|
|
PredInfo0, PredInfo),
|
|
{ NumErrors1 = NumErrors0 }
|
|
;
|
|
write_pred_progress_message("% Purity-checking ", PredId,
|
|
ModuleInfo0),
|
|
post_typecheck__check_type_bindings(PredId, PredInfo0,
|
|
PredInfo1, ModuleInfo0,
|
|
UnboundTypeErrsInThisPred),
|
|
puritycheck_pred(PredId, PredInfo1, PredInfo2, ModuleInfo0,
|
|
PurityErrsInThisPred),
|
|
post_typecheck__finish_pred(ModuleInfo0, PredId, PredInfo2,
|
|
PredInfo),
|
|
{ NumErrors1 is NumErrors0 + UnboundTypeErrsInThisPred
|
|
+ PurityErrsInThisPred }
|
|
),
|
|
{ map__det_update(Preds0, PredId, PredInfo, Preds) },
|
|
{ module_info_get_predicate_table(ModuleInfo0, PredTable0) },
|
|
{ predicate_table_set_preds(PredTable0, Preds, PredTable) },
|
|
{ module_info_set_predicate_table(ModuleInfo0, PredTable,
|
|
ModuleInfo1) },
|
|
check_preds_purity_2(PredIds, ModuleInfo1, ModuleInfo,
|
|
NumErrors1, NumErrors).
|
|
|
|
% Purity-check the code for single predicate, reporting any errors.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Check purity of a single predicate
|
|
%
|
|
% Purity checking is quite simple. Since impurity /must/ be declared, we can
|
|
% perform a single pass checking that the actual purity of each predicate
|
|
% matches the declared (or implied) purity. A predicate is just as pure as
|
|
% its least pure goal. While we're doing this, we attach a `feature' to each
|
|
% goal that is not pure, including non-atomic goals, indicating its purity.
|
|
% This information must be maintained by later compilation passes, at least
|
|
% until after the last pass that may perform transformations that would not
|
|
% be correct for impure code. As we check purity and attach impurity
|
|
% features, we also check that impure (semipure) atomic goals were marked in
|
|
% the source code as impure (semipure). At this stage in the computation,
|
|
% this is indicated by already having the appropriate goal feature. (During
|
|
% the translation from term to goal, calls have their purity attached to
|
|
% them, and in the translation from goal to hlds_goal, the attached purity is
|
|
% turned into the appropriate feature in the hlds_goal_info.)
|
|
|
|
:- pred puritycheck_pred(pred_id, pred_info, pred_info, module_info, int,
|
|
io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode puritycheck_pred(in, in, out, in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
puritycheck_pred(PredId, PredInfo0, PredInfo, ModuleInfo, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ pred_info_get_purity(PredInfo0, DeclPurity)} ,
|
|
{ pred_info_get_promised_pure(PredInfo0, Promised) },
|
|
( { pred_info_get_goal_type(PredInfo0, pragmas) } ->
|
|
{ WorstPurity = (impure) },
|
|
{ Purity = pure },
|
|
{ PredInfo = PredInfo0 },
|
|
{ NumErrors0 = 0 }
|
|
;
|
|
{ pred_info_clauses_info(PredInfo0, ClausesInfo0) },
|
|
{ ClausesInfo0 = clauses_info(A, B, C, D, Clauses0) },
|
|
{ ClausesInfo = clauses_info(A, B, C, D, Clauses) },
|
|
{ pred_info_set_clauses_info(PredInfo0, ClausesInfo,
|
|
PredInfo) },
|
|
compute_purity(Clauses0, Clauses, PredInfo0, ModuleInfo,
|
|
pure, Purity, 0, NumErrors0),
|
|
{ WorstPurity = Purity }
|
|
),
|
|
(
|
|
{ DeclPurity \= pure, Promised = yes } ->
|
|
{ NumErrors is NumErrors0 + 1 },
|
|
error_inconsistent_promise(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId,
|
|
DeclPurity)
|
|
; { less_pure(DeclPurity, WorstPurity) } ->
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 },
|
|
warn_exaggerated_impurity_decl(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId,
|
|
DeclPurity, WorstPurity)
|
|
; { less_pure(Purity, DeclPurity), Promised = no } ->
|
|
{ NumErrors is NumErrors0 + 1 },
|
|
error_inferred_impure(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId, Purity)
|
|
; { Purity = pure, Promised = yes } ->
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 },
|
|
warn_unnecessary_promise_pure(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId)
|
|
;
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Infer the purity of a single (non-pragma c_code) predicate
|
|
|
|
:- pred compute_purity(list(clause), list(clause), pred_info, module_info,
|
|
purity, purity, int, int, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode compute_purity(in, out, in, in, in, out, in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
compute_purity([], [], _, _, Purity, Purity, NumErrors, NumErrors) -->
|
|
[].
|
|
compute_purity([Clause0|Clauses0], [Clause|Clauses], PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
Purity0, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ Clause0 = clause(Ids, Body0 - Info0, Context) },
|
|
compute_expr_purity(Body0, Body, Info0, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
no, Bodypurity, NumErrors0, NumErrors1),
|
|
{ add_goal_info_purity_feature(Info0, Bodypurity, Info) },
|
|
{ worst_purity(Purity0, Bodypurity, Purity1) },
|
|
{ Clause = clause(Ids, Body - Info, Context) },
|
|
compute_purity(Clauses0, Clauses, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
Purity1, Purity, NumErrors1, NumErrors).
|
|
|
|
:- pred compute_expr_purity(hlds_goal_expr, hlds_goal_expr, hlds_goal_info,
|
|
pred_info, module_info, bool, purity, int, int, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode compute_expr_purity(in, out, in, in, in, in, out, in, out, di, uo)
|
|
is det.
|
|
|
|
compute_expr_purity(conj(Goals0), conj(Goals), _, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goals_purity(Goals0, Goals, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, pure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(par_conj(Goals0, SM), par_conj(Goals, SM), _, PredInfo,
|
|
ModuleInfo, InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goals_purity(Goals0, Goals, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, pure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(call(PredId0,ProcId,Vars,BIState,UContext,Name0),
|
|
call(PredId,ProcId,Vars,BIState,UContext,Name), GoalInfo,
|
|
PredInfo, ModuleInfo, InClosure, ActualPurity,
|
|
NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ post_typecheck__resolve_pred_overloading(PredId0, Vars, PredInfo,
|
|
ModuleInfo, Name0, Name, PredId) },
|
|
{ module_info_preds(ModuleInfo, Preds) },
|
|
{ map__lookup(Preds, PredId, CalleePredInfo) },
|
|
{ pred_info_get_purity(CalleePredInfo, ActualPurity) },
|
|
{ infer_goal_info_purity(GoalInfo, DeclaredPurity) },
|
|
{ goal_info_get_context(GoalInfo, CallContext) },
|
|
( { code_util__compiler_generated(PredInfo) } ->
|
|
% Don't require purity annotations on calls in
|
|
% compiler-generated code
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
; { ActualPurity = DeclaredPurity } ->
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
; { InClosure = yes } ->
|
|
% Don't report purity errors inside closures: the whole
|
|
% closure is an error if it's not pure
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
; { less_pure(ActualPurity, DeclaredPurity) } ->
|
|
error_missing_body_impurity_decl(ModuleInfo, CalleePredInfo,
|
|
PredId, CallContext,
|
|
ActualPurity),
|
|
{ NumErrors is NumErrors0 + 1 }
|
|
;
|
|
warn_unnecessary_body_impurity_decl(ModuleInfo, CalleePredInfo,
|
|
PredId, CallContext,
|
|
ActualPurity,
|
|
DeclaredPurity),
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(HOCall, HOCall, _, _, _, _, pure, NumErrors, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ HOCall = higher_order_call(_,_,_,_,_,_) }.
|
|
compute_expr_purity(CMCall, CMCall, _, _, _, _, pure, NumErrors, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ CMCall = class_method_call(_,_,_,_,_,_) }.
|
|
compute_expr_purity(switch(Var,Canfail,Cases0,Storemap),
|
|
switch(Var,Canfail,Cases,Storemap), _, PredInfo,
|
|
ModuleInfo, InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_cases_purity(Cases0, Cases, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, pure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(Unif0, Unif, GoalInfo, PredInfo, ModuleInfo, _,
|
|
pure, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ Unif0 = unify(A,RHS0,C,D,E) },
|
|
{ Unif = unify(A,RHS,C,D,E) },
|
|
( { RHS0 = lambda_goal(F, G, H, I, J, Goal0 - Info0) } ->
|
|
{ RHS = lambda_goal(F, G, H, I, J, Goal - Info0) },
|
|
compute_expr_purity(Goal0, Goal, Info0, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
yes, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors1),
|
|
error_if_closure_impure(GoalInfo, Purity,
|
|
NumErrors1, NumErrors)
|
|
;
|
|
{ RHS = RHS0 },
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(disj(Goals0,Store), disj(Goals,Store), _, PredInfo,
|
|
ModuleInfo, InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goals_purity(Goals0, Goals, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, pure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(not(Goal0), not(Goal), _, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goal0, Goal, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(some(Vars,Goal0), some(Vars,Goal), _, PredInfo,
|
|
ModuleInfo, InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goal0, Goal, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors).
|
|
compute_expr_purity(if_then_else(Vars,Goali0,Goalt0,Goale0,Store),
|
|
if_then_else(Vars,Goali,Goalt,Goale,Store), _, PredInfo,
|
|
ModuleInfo, InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goali0, Goali, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity1, NumErrors0, NumErrors1),
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goalt0, Goalt, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity2, NumErrors1, NumErrors2),
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goale0, Goale, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity3, NumErrors2, NumErrors),
|
|
{ worst_purity(Purity1, Purity2, Purity12) },
|
|
{ worst_purity(Purity12, Purity3, Purity) }.
|
|
compute_expr_purity(Ccode, Ccode, _, _, ModuleInfo, _, Purity,
|
|
NumErrors, NumErrors) -->
|
|
{ Ccode = pragma_c_code(_,PredId,_,_,_,_,_) },
|
|
{ module_info_preds(ModuleInfo, Preds) },
|
|
{ map__lookup(Preds, PredId, PredInfo) },
|
|
{ pred_info_get_purity(PredInfo, Purity) }.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred compute_goal_purity(hlds_goal, hlds_goal, pred_info,
|
|
module_info, bool, purity, int, int, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode compute_goal_purity(in, out, in, in, in, out, in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goal0 - GoalInfo0, Goal - GoalInfo, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_expr_purity(Goal0, Goal, GoalInfo0, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors),
|
|
{ add_goal_info_purity_feature(GoalInfo0, Purity, GoalInfo) }.
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Compute the purity of a list of hlds_goals. Since the purity of a
|
|
% disjunction is computed the same way as the purity of a conjunction, we use
|
|
% the same code for both
|
|
|
|
:- pred compute_goals_purity(list(hlds_goal), list(hlds_goal), pred_info,
|
|
module_info, bool, purity, purity, int, int, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode compute_goals_purity(in, out, in, in, in, in, out, in, out, di, uo)
|
|
is det.
|
|
|
|
compute_goals_purity([], [], _, _, _, Purity, Purity, NumErrors, NumErrors) -->
|
|
[].
|
|
compute_goals_purity([Goal0|Goals0], [Goal|Goals], PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity0, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goal0, Goal, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity1, NumErrors0, NumErrors1),
|
|
{ worst_purity(Purity0, Purity1, Purity2) },
|
|
compute_goals_purity(Goals0, Goals, PredInfo, ModuleInfo, InClosure,
|
|
Purity2, Purity, NumErrors1, NumErrors).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred compute_cases_purity(list(case), list(case), pred_info, module_info,
|
|
bool, purity, purity, int, int, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode compute_cases_purity(in, out, in, in, in, in, out, in, out, di, uo)
|
|
is det.
|
|
|
|
compute_cases_purity([], [], _, _, _, Purity, Purity, NumErrors, NumErrors) -->
|
|
[].
|
|
compute_cases_purity([case(Ctor,Goal0)|Goals0], [case(Ctor,Goal)|Goals],
|
|
PredInfo, ModuleInfo, InClosure, Purity0, Purity,
|
|
NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
compute_goal_purity(Goal0, Goal, PredInfo, ModuleInfo,
|
|
InClosure, Purity1, NumErrors0, NumErrors1),
|
|
{ worst_purity(Purity0, Purity1, Purity2) },
|
|
compute_cases_purity(Goals0, Goals, PredInfo, ModuleInfo, InClosure,
|
|
Purity2, Purity, NumErrors1, NumErrors).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Print error messages
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred error_inconsistent_promise(module_info, pred_info, pred_id, purity,
|
|
io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode error_inconsistent_promise(in, in, in, in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
error_inconsistent_promise(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId, Purity) -->
|
|
{ pred_info_context(PredInfo, Context) },
|
|
write_context_and_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
report_warning(" warning: declared `"),
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string("' but promised pure.\n"),
|
|
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(verbose_errors, VerboseErrors),
|
|
( { VerboseErrors = yes } ->
|
|
{ pred_info_get_is_pred_or_func(PredInfo, PredOrFunc) },
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(" A pure "),
|
|
hlds_out__write_pred_or_func(PredOrFunc),
|
|
io__write_string(" that invokes impure or semipure code should\n"),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(
|
|
" be promised pure and should have no impurity declaration.\n"
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
[]
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred warn_exaggerated_impurity_decl(module_info, pred_info, pred_id,
|
|
purity, purity, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode warn_exaggerated_impurity_decl(in, in, in, in, in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
warn_exaggerated_impurity_decl(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId,
|
|
DeclPurity, AcutalPurity) -->
|
|
{ pred_info_context(PredInfo, Context) },
|
|
write_context_and_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
report_warning(" warning: declared `"),
|
|
write_purity(DeclPurity),
|
|
io__write_string("' but actually "),
|
|
write_purity(AcutalPurity),
|
|
io__write_string(".\n").
|
|
|
|
:- pred warn_unnecessary_promise_pure(module_info, pred_info, pred_id,
|
|
io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode warn_unnecessary_promise_pure(in, in, in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
warn_unnecessary_promise_pure(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId) -->
|
|
{ pred_info_context(PredInfo, Context) },
|
|
write_context_and_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
report_warning(" warning: unnecessary `promise_pure' pragma.\n"),
|
|
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(verbose_errors, VerboseErrors),
|
|
( { VerboseErrors = yes } ->
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
{ pred_info_get_is_pred_or_func(PredInfo, PredOrFunc) },
|
|
io__write_string(" This "),
|
|
hlds_out__write_pred_or_func(PredOrFunc),
|
|
io__write_string(
|
|
" does not invoke any impure or semipure code,\n"
|
|
),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(
|
|
" so there is no need for a `promise_pure' pragma.\n"
|
|
)
|
|
;
|
|
[]
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred error_inferred_impure(module_info, pred_info, pred_id, purity,
|
|
io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode error_inferred_impure(in, in, in, in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
error_inferred_impure(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId, Purity) -->
|
|
{ pred_info_context(PredInfo, Context) },
|
|
{ pred_info_get_is_pred_or_func(PredInfo, PredOrFunc) },
|
|
write_context_and_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(" error: "),
|
|
hlds_out__write_pred_or_func(PredOrFunc),
|
|
io__write_string(" is "),
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string(".\n"),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
( { code_util__compiler_generated(PredInfo) } ->
|
|
io__write_string(" It must be pure.\n")
|
|
;
|
|
io__write_string(" It must be declared `"),
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string("' or promised pure.\n")
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred error_missing_body_impurity_decl(module_info, pred_info, pred_id,
|
|
context, purity, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode error_missing_body_impurity_decl(in, in, in, in, in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
error_missing_body_impurity_decl(ModuleInfo, _, PredId, Context,
|
|
Purity) -->
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string("In call to "),
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string(" "),
|
|
hlds_out__write_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredId),
|
|
io__write_string(":\n"),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(" error: call must be preceded by `"),
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string("' indicator.\n").
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred warn_unnecessary_body_impurity_decl(module_info, pred_info, pred_id,
|
|
context, purity, purity, io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode warn_unnecessary_body_impurity_decl(in, in, in, in, in, in, di, uo)
|
|
is det.
|
|
|
|
warn_unnecessary_body_impurity_decl(ModuleInfo, _, PredId, Context,
|
|
ActualPurity, DeclaredPurity) -->
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string("In call to "),
|
|
hlds_out__write_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredId),
|
|
io__write_string(":\n"),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(" warning: unnecessary `"),
|
|
write_purity(DeclaredPurity),
|
|
io__write_string("' indicator.\n"),
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
( { ActualPurity = pure } ->
|
|
io__write_string(" No purity indicator is necessary.\n")
|
|
;
|
|
io__write_string(" A purity indicator of `"),
|
|
write_purity(ActualPurity),
|
|
io__write_string("' is sufficient.\n")
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred error_if_closure_impure(hlds_goal_info, purity, int, int,
|
|
io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode error_if_closure_impure(in, in, in, out, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
error_if_closure_impure(GoalInfo, Purity, NumErrors0, NumErrors) -->
|
|
( { Purity = pure } ->
|
|
{ NumErrors = NumErrors0 }
|
|
;
|
|
{ NumErrors is NumErrors0 + 1 },
|
|
{ goal_info_get_context(GoalInfo, Context) },
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string("Error in closure: closure is "),
|
|
write_purity(Purity),
|
|
io__write_string(".\n"),
|
|
globals__io_lookup_bool_option(verbose_errors, VerboseErrors),
|
|
( { VerboseErrors = yes } ->
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string(" All closures must be pure.\n")
|
|
;
|
|
[]
|
|
)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- pred write_context_and_pred_id(module_info, pred_info, pred_id,
|
|
io__state, io__state).
|
|
:- mode write_context_and_pred_id(in, in, in, di, uo) is det.
|
|
|
|
write_context_and_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredInfo, PredId) -->
|
|
{ pred_info_context(PredInfo, Context) },
|
|
prog_out__write_context(Context),
|
|
io__write_string("In "),
|
|
hlds_out__write_pred_id(ModuleInfo, PredId),
|
|
io__write_string(":\n").
|
|
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|