mirror of
https://github.com/Mercury-Language/mercury.git
synced 2025-12-14 13:23:53 +00:00
8a28e40c9b
Estimated hours taken: 2 Branches: main Add the predicates sorry, unexpected and expect to library/error.m. compiler/compiler_util.m: library/error.m: Move the predicates sorry, unexpected and expect from compiler_util to error. Put the predicates in error.m into the same order as their declarations. compiler/*.m: Change imports as needed. compiler/lp.m: compiler/lp_rational.m: Change imports as needed, and some minor cleanups. deep_profiler/*.m: Switch to using the new library predicates, instead of calling error directly. Some other minor cleanups. NEWS: Mention the new predicates in the standard library.
770 lines
29 KiB
Mathematica
770 lines
29 KiB
Mathematica
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% vim: ft=mercury ts=4 sw=4 et
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
% Copyright (C) 1999-2010 The University of Melbourne.
|
|
% This file may only be copied under the terms of the GNU General
|
|
% Public License - see the file COPYING in the Mercury distribution.
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%
|
|
% Module: assertion.m.
|
|
% Main authors: petdr.
|
|
%
|
|
% This module is an abstract interface to the assertion table.
|
|
% Note that this is a first design and will probably change
|
|
% substantially in the future.
|
|
%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- module hlds.assertion.
|
|
:- interface.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module hlds.hlds_data.
|
|
:- import_module hlds.hlds_goal.
|
|
:- import_module hlds.hlds_module.
|
|
:- import_module hlds.hlds_pred.
|
|
:- import_module parse_tree.prog_data.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module pair.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% Get the hlds_goal which represents the assertion.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred assert_id_goal(module_info::in, assert_id::in, hlds_goal::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% Record into the pred_info of each pred used in the assertion
|
|
% the assert_id.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred record_preds_used_in(hlds_goal::in, assert_id::in,
|
|
module_info::in, module_info::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
% is_commutativity_assertion(MI, Id, Vs, CVs):
|
|
%
|
|
% Does the assertion represented by the assertion id, Id,
|
|
% state the commutativity of a pred/func?
|
|
% We extend the usual definition of commutativity to apply to
|
|
% predicates or functions with more than two arguments as
|
|
% follows by allowing extra arguments which must be invariant.
|
|
% If so, this predicate returns (in CVs) the two variables which
|
|
% can be swapped in order if it was a call to Vs.
|
|
%
|
|
% The assertion must be in a form similar to this
|
|
% all [Is,A,B,C] ( p(Is,A,B,C) <=> p(Is,B,A,C) )
|
|
% for the predicate to return true (note that the invariant
|
|
% arguments, Is, can be any where providing they are in
|
|
% identical locations on both sides of the equivalence).
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred is_commutativity_assertion(module_info::in, assert_id::in,
|
|
prog_vars::in, pair(prog_var)::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% is_associativity_assertion(MI, Id, Vs, CVs, OV):
|
|
%
|
|
% Does the assertion represented by the assertion id, Id,
|
|
% state the associativity of a pred/func?
|
|
% We extend the usual definition of associativity to apply to
|
|
% predicates or functions with more than two arguments as
|
|
% follows by allowing extra arguments which must be invariant.
|
|
% If so, this predicate returns (in CVs) the two variables which
|
|
% can be swapped in order if it was a call to Vs, and the
|
|
% output variable, OV, related to these two variables (for the
|
|
% case below it would be the variable in the same position as
|
|
% AB, BC or ABC).
|
|
%
|
|
% The assertion must be in a form similar to this
|
|
%
|
|
% all [Is,A,B,C,ABC]
|
|
% (
|
|
% some [AB] p(Is,A,B,AB), p(Is,AB,C,ABC)
|
|
% <=>
|
|
% some [BC] p(Is,B,C,BC), p(Is,A,BC,ABC)
|
|
% )
|
|
%
|
|
% for the predicate to return true (note that the invariant
|
|
% arguments, Is, can be any where providing they are in
|
|
% identical locations on both sides of the equivalence).
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred is_associativity_assertion(module_info::in, assert_id::in,
|
|
prog_vars::in, pair(prog_var)::out, prog_var::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% is_update_assertion(MI, Id, PId, Ss):
|
|
%
|
|
% is true iff the assertion, Id, is about a predicate, PId,
|
|
% which takes some state as input and produces some state as output
|
|
% and we are guaranteed to get the same final state regardless of
|
|
% the order that the state is updated.
|
|
%
|
|
% i.e. the promise should look something like this, note that A
|
|
% and B could be vectors of variables.
|
|
%
|
|
% :- promise all [A,B,SO,S]
|
|
% (
|
|
% (some [SA] (update(S0,A,SA), update(SA,B,S)))
|
|
% <=>
|
|
% (some [SB] (update(S0,B,SB), update(SB,A,S)))
|
|
% ).
|
|
%
|
|
% Given the actual variables, Vs, to the call to update, return
|
|
% the pair of variables which are state variables, SPair.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred is_update_assertion(module_info::in, assert_id::in,
|
|
pred_id::in, prog_vars::in, pair(prog_var)::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% is_construction_equivalence_assertion(MI, Id, C, P):
|
|
%
|
|
% Can a single construction unification whose functor is determined
|
|
% by the cons_id, C, be expressed as a call to the predid, P (with possibly
|
|
% some construction unifications to initialise the arguments).
|
|
%
|
|
% The assertion will be in a form similar to
|
|
%
|
|
% all [L,H,T] ( L = [H | T] <=> append([H], T, L) )
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred is_construction_equivalence_assertion(module_info::in, assert_id::in,
|
|
cons_id::in, pred_id::in) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
% Place a hlds_goal into a standard form. Currently all the
|
|
% code does is replace conj([G]) with G.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred normalise_goal(hlds_goal::in, hlds_goal::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- implementation.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module hlds.goal_util.
|
|
:- import_module hlds.hlds_clauses.
|
|
:- import_module mdbcomp.
|
|
:- import_module mdbcomp.prim_data.
|
|
|
|
:- import_module assoc_list.
|
|
:- import_module list.
|
|
:- import_module map.
|
|
:- import_module maybe.
|
|
:- import_module require.
|
|
:- import_module set.
|
|
:- import_module solutions.
|
|
|
|
:- type subst == map(prog_var, prog_var).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
is_commutativity_assertion(Module, AssertId, CallVars, CommutativeVars) :-
|
|
assert_id_goal(Module, AssertId, Goal),
|
|
goal_is_equivalence(Goal, P, Q),
|
|
P = hlds_goal(plain_call(PredId, _, VarsP, _, _, _), _),
|
|
Q = hlds_goal(plain_call(PredId, _, VarsQ, _, _, _), _),
|
|
commutative_var_ordering(VarsP, VarsQ, CallVars, CommutativeVars).
|
|
|
|
% commutative_var_ordering(Ps, Qs, Vs, CommutativeVs):
|
|
%
|
|
% Check that the two list of variables are identical except that
|
|
% the position of two variables has been swapped.
|
|
% e.g [A,B,C] and [B,A,C] is true.
|
|
% It also takes a list of variables, Vs, to a call and returns
|
|
% the two variables in that list that can be swapped, ie [A,B].
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred commutative_var_ordering(prog_vars::in, prog_vars::in,
|
|
prog_vars::in, pair(prog_var)::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
commutative_var_ordering([P | Ps], [Q | Qs], [V | Vs], CommutativeVars) :-
|
|
( P = Q ->
|
|
commutative_var_ordering(Ps, Qs, Vs, CommutativeVars)
|
|
;
|
|
commutative_var_ordering_2(P, Q, Ps, Qs, Vs, CallVarB),
|
|
CommutativeVars = V - CallVarB
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred commutative_var_ordering_2(prog_var::in, prog_var::in, prog_vars::in,
|
|
prog_vars::in, prog_vars::in, prog_var::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
commutative_var_ordering_2(VarP, VarQ, [P | Ps], [Q | Qs], [V | Vs],
|
|
CallVarB) :-
|
|
( P = Q ->
|
|
commutative_var_ordering_2(VarP, VarQ, Ps, Qs, Vs, CallVarB)
|
|
;
|
|
CallVarB = V,
|
|
P = VarQ,
|
|
Q = VarP,
|
|
Ps = Qs
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
is_associativity_assertion(Module, AssertId, CallVars,
|
|
AssociativeVars, OutputVar) :-
|
|
assert_id_goal(Module, AssertId, hlds_goal(GoalExpr, GoalInfo)),
|
|
goal_is_equivalence(hlds_goal(GoalExpr, GoalInfo), P, Q),
|
|
|
|
UniversiallyQuantifiedVars = goal_info_get_nonlocals(GoalInfo),
|
|
|
|
% There may or may not be a some [] depending on whether
|
|
% the user explicity qualified the call or not.
|
|
(
|
|
P = hlds_goal(scope(_, hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, PCalls0), _)), _),
|
|
Q = hlds_goal(scope(_, hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, QCalls0), _)), _)
|
|
->
|
|
PCalls = PCalls0,
|
|
QCalls = QCalls0
|
|
;
|
|
P = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, PCalls), _PGoalInfo),
|
|
Q = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, QCalls), _QGoalInfo)
|
|
),
|
|
promise_equivalent_solutions [AssociativeVars, OutputVar] (
|
|
associative(PCalls, QCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, CallVars,
|
|
AssociativeVars - OutputVar)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
% associative(Ps, Qs, Us, R):
|
|
%
|
|
% If the assertion was in the form
|
|
% all [Us] (some [] (Ps)) <=> (some [] (Qs))
|
|
% try and rearrange the order of Ps and Qs so that the assertion
|
|
% is in the standard from
|
|
%
|
|
% compose( A, B, AB), compose(B, C, BC),
|
|
% compose(AB, C, ABC) <=> compose(A, BC, ABC)
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred associative(hlds_goals::in, hlds_goals::in,
|
|
set(prog_var)::in, prog_vars::in,
|
|
pair(pair(prog_var), prog_var)::out) is cc_nondet.
|
|
|
|
associative(PCalls, QCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, CallVars,
|
|
(CallVarA - CallVarB) - OutputVar) :-
|
|
reorder(PCalls, QCalls, LHSCalls, RHSCalls),
|
|
process_one_side(LHSCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
AB, PairsL, Vs),
|
|
process_one_side(RHSCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
BC, PairsR, _),
|
|
|
|
% If you read the predicate documentation, you will note that
|
|
% for each pair of variables on the left hand side there are an equivalent
|
|
% pair of variables on the right hand side. As the pairs of variables
|
|
% are not symmetric, the call to list.perm will only succeed once,
|
|
% if at all.
|
|
assoc_list.from_corresponding_lists(PairsL, PairsR, Pairs),
|
|
list.perm(Pairs, [(A - AB) - (B - A), (B - C) - (C - BC),
|
|
(AB - ABC) - (BC - ABC)]),
|
|
|
|
assoc_list.from_corresponding_lists(Vs, CallVars, AssocList),
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-_Y::in) is semidet :- X = AB),
|
|
AssocList, [_AB - OutputVar]),
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-_Y::in) is semidet :- X = A),
|
|
AssocList, [_A - CallVarA]),
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-_Y::in) is semidet :- X = B),
|
|
AssocList, [_B - CallVarB]).
|
|
|
|
% reorder(Ps, Qs, Ls, Rs):
|
|
%
|
|
% Given both sides of the equivalence return another possible ordering.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred reorder(hlds_goals::in, hlds_goals::in,
|
|
hlds_goals::out, hlds_goals::out) is multi.
|
|
|
|
reorder(PCalls, QCalls, LHSCalls, RHSCalls) :-
|
|
list.perm(PCalls, LHSCalls),
|
|
list.perm(QCalls, RHSCalls).
|
|
reorder(PCalls, QCalls, LHSCalls, RHSCalls) :-
|
|
list.perm(PCalls, RHSCalls),
|
|
list.perm(QCalls, LHSCalls).
|
|
|
|
% process_one_side(Gs, Us, L, Ps):
|
|
%
|
|
% Given the list of goals, Gs, which are one side of a possible
|
|
% associative equivalence, and the universally quantified
|
|
% variables, Us, of the goals return L the existentially
|
|
% quantified variable that links the two calls and Ps the list
|
|
% of variables which are not invariants.
|
|
%
|
|
% i.e. for app(TypeInfo, X, Y, XY), app(TypeInfo, XY, Z, XYZ)
|
|
% L <= XY and Ps <= [X - XY, Y - Z, XY - XYZ]
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred process_one_side(hlds_goals::in, set(prog_var)::in, pred_id::out,
|
|
prog_var::out, assoc_list(prog_var)::out, prog_vars::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
process_one_side(Goals, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
LinkingVar, Vars, VarsA) :-
|
|
process_two_linked_calls(Goals, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
LinkingVar, Vars0, VarsA),
|
|
|
|
% Filter out all the invariant arguments, and then make sure that
|
|
% their is only 3 arguments left.
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-Y::in) is semidet :- not X = Y), Vars0, Vars),
|
|
list.length(Vars, number_of_associative_vars).
|
|
|
|
:- func number_of_associative_vars = int.
|
|
|
|
number_of_associative_vars = 3.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
is_update_assertion(Module, AssertId, _PredId, CallVars, StateA - StateB) :-
|
|
assert_id_goal(Module, AssertId, hlds_goal(GoalExpr, GoalInfo)),
|
|
goal_is_equivalence(hlds_goal(GoalExpr, GoalInfo), P, Q),
|
|
UniversiallyQuantifiedVars = goal_info_get_nonlocals(GoalInfo),
|
|
|
|
% There may or may not be an explicit some [Vars] there,
|
|
% as quantification now works correctly.
|
|
(
|
|
P = hlds_goal(scope(_, hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, PCalls0), _)), _),
|
|
Q = hlds_goal(scope(_, hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, QCalls0), _)), _)
|
|
->
|
|
PCalls = PCalls0,
|
|
QCalls = QCalls0
|
|
;
|
|
P = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, PCalls), _PGoalInfo),
|
|
Q = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, QCalls), _QGoalInfo)
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
solutions.solutions(update(PCalls, QCalls,
|
|
UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, CallVars), [StateA - StateB | _]).
|
|
|
|
% compose(S0, A, SA), compose(SB, A, S),
|
|
% compose(SA, B, S) <=> compose(S0, B, SB)
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred update(hlds_goals::in, hlds_goals::in, set(prog_var)::in,
|
|
prog_vars::in, pair(prog_var)::out) is nondet.
|
|
|
|
update(PCalls, QCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, CallVars,
|
|
StateA - StateB) :-
|
|
reorder(PCalls, QCalls, LHSCalls, RHSCalls),
|
|
process_two_linked_calls(LHSCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
SA, PairsL, Vs),
|
|
process_two_linked_calls(RHSCalls, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
SB, PairsR, _),
|
|
|
|
assoc_list.from_corresponding_lists(PairsL, PairsR, Pairs0),
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-Y::in) is semidet :- X \= Y), Pairs0, Pairs),
|
|
list.length(Pairs) = 2,
|
|
|
|
% If you read the predicate documentation, you will note that
|
|
% for each pair of variables on the left hand side there is an equivalent
|
|
% pair of variables on the right hand side. As the pairs of variables
|
|
% are not symmetric, the call to list.perm will only succeed once,
|
|
% if at all.
|
|
list.perm(Pairs, [(S0 - SA) - (SB - S0), (SA - S) - (S - SB)]),
|
|
|
|
assoc_list.from_corresponding_lists(Vs, CallVars, AssocList),
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-_Y::in) is semidet :- X = S0),
|
|
AssocList, [_S0 - StateA]),
|
|
list.filter((pred(X-_Y::in) is semidet :- X = SA),
|
|
AssocList, [_SA - StateB]).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% process_two_linked_calls(Gs, UQVs, PId, LV, AL, VAs):
|
|
%
|
|
% is true iff the list of goals, Gs, with universally quantified
|
|
% variables, UQVs, is two calls to the same predicate, PId, with
|
|
% one variable that links them, LV. AL will be the assoc list
|
|
% that is the each variable from the first call with its
|
|
% corresponding variable in the second call, and VAs are the
|
|
% variables of the first call.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred process_two_linked_calls(hlds_goals::in, set(prog_var)::in,
|
|
pred_id::out, prog_var::out, assoc_list(prog_var)::out, prog_vars::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
process_two_linked_calls(Goals, UniversiallyQuantifiedVars, PredId,
|
|
LinkingVar, Vars, VarsA) :-
|
|
Goals = [hlds_goal(plain_call(PredId, _, VarsA, _, _, _), _),
|
|
hlds_goal(plain_call(PredId, _, VarsB, _, _, _), _)],
|
|
|
|
% Determine the linking variable, L. By definition it must be
|
|
% existentially quantified and member of both variable lists.
|
|
CommonVars = list_to_set(VarsA) `intersect` list_to_set(VarsB),
|
|
set.singleton_set(CommonVars `difference` UniversiallyQuantifiedVars,
|
|
LinkingVar),
|
|
|
|
% Set up mapping between the variables in the two calls.
|
|
assoc_list.from_corresponding_lists(VarsA, VarsB, Vars).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
is_construction_equivalence_assertion(Module, AssertId, ConsId, PredId) :-
|
|
assert_id_goal(Module, AssertId, Goal),
|
|
goal_is_equivalence(Goal, P, Q),
|
|
( single_construction(P, ConsId) ->
|
|
predicate_call(Q, PredId)
|
|
;
|
|
single_construction(Q, ConsId),
|
|
predicate_call(P, PredId)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
% One side of the equivalence must be just the single unification
|
|
% with the correct cons_id.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred single_construction(hlds_goal::in, cons_id::in) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
single_construction(Goal, ConsId) :-
|
|
Goal = hlds_goal(GoalExpr, _),
|
|
GoalExpr = unify(_, UnifyRHS, _, _, _),
|
|
UnifyRHS = rhs_functor(cons(UnqualifiedSymName, Arity, _TypeCtorA), _, _),
|
|
ConsId = cons(QualifiedSymName, Arity, _TypeCtorB),
|
|
% Before post-typecheck, TypeCtorA and TypeCtorB would be dummies,
|
|
% and would thus match even if the two functors are NOT of the same type.
|
|
% Note that by insisting on cons, we effectively disallow assertions
|
|
% about tuples.
|
|
match_sym_name(UnqualifiedSymName, QualifiedSymName).
|
|
|
|
% The side containing the predicate call must be a single call
|
|
% to the predicate with 0 or more construction unifications
|
|
% which setup the arguments to the predicates.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred predicate_call(hlds_goal::in, pred_id::in) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
predicate_call(Goal, PredId) :-
|
|
( Goal = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, Goals), _) ->
|
|
list.member(Call, Goals),
|
|
Call = hlds_goal(plain_call(PredId, _, _, _, _, _), _),
|
|
list.delete(Goals, Call, Unifications),
|
|
P = (pred(G::in) is semidet :-
|
|
not (
|
|
G = hlds_goal(unify(_, UnifyRhs, _, _, _), _),
|
|
UnifyRhs = rhs_functor(_, _, _)
|
|
)
|
|
),
|
|
list.filter(P, Unifications, [])
|
|
;
|
|
Goal = hlds_goal(plain_call(PredId, _, _, _, _, _), _)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
assert_id_goal(Module, AssertId, Goal) :-
|
|
module_info_get_assertion_table(Module, AssertTable),
|
|
assertion_table_lookup(AssertTable, AssertId, PredId),
|
|
module_info_pred_info(Module, PredId, PredInfo),
|
|
pred_info_get_clauses_info(PredInfo, ClausesInfo),
|
|
clauses_info_get_clauses_rep(ClausesInfo, ClausesRep, _ItemNumbers),
|
|
get_clause_list(ClausesRep, Clauses),
|
|
( Clauses = [clause(_ProcIds, Goal0, _Lang, _Context)] ->
|
|
normalise_goal(Goal0, Goal)
|
|
;
|
|
unexpected(this_file, "goal: not an assertion")
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- pred goal_is_implication(hlds_goal::in, hlds_goal::out, hlds_goal::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
goal_is_implication(Goal, P, Q) :-
|
|
% Goal = (P => Q)
|
|
Goal = hlds_goal(negation(hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, GoalList), _)), GI),
|
|
list.reverse(GoalList) = [NotQ | Ps],
|
|
( Ps = [P0] ->
|
|
P = P0
|
|
;
|
|
P = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, list.reverse(Ps)), GI)
|
|
),
|
|
NotQ = hlds_goal(negation(Q), _).
|
|
|
|
:- pred goal_is_equivalence(hlds_goal::in, hlds_goal::out, hlds_goal::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
goal_is_equivalence(Goal, P, Q) :-
|
|
% Goal = P <=> Q
|
|
Goal = hlds_goal(conj(plain_conj, [A, B]), _GoalInfo),
|
|
map.init(Subst),
|
|
goal_is_implication(A, PA, QA),
|
|
goal_is_implication(B, QB, PB),
|
|
equal_goals(PA, PB, Subst, _),
|
|
equal_goals(QA, QB, Subst, _),
|
|
P = PA,
|
|
Q = QA.
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% equal_goals(GA, GB):
|
|
%
|
|
% Do these two goals represent the same hlds_goal modulo renaming?
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred equal_goals(hlds_goal::in, hlds_goal::in,
|
|
subst::in, subst::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_goals(GoalA, GoalB, !Subst) :-
|
|
GoalA = hlds_goal(GoalExprA, _GoalInfoA),
|
|
GoalB = hlds_goal(GoalExprB, _GoalInfoB),
|
|
equal_goal_exprs(GoalExprA, GoalExprB, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_goal_exprs(hlds_goal_expr::in, hlds_goal_expr::in,
|
|
subst::in, subst::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_goal_exprs(GoalExprA, GoalExprB, !Subst) :-
|
|
(
|
|
GoalExprA = conj(ConjType, GoalsA),
|
|
GoalExprB = conj(ConjType, GoalsB),
|
|
equal_goals_list(GoalsA, GoalsB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = plain_call(PredId, _, ArgVarsA, _, _, _),
|
|
GoalExprB = plain_call(PredId, _, ArgVarsB, _, _, _),
|
|
equal_vars(ArgVarsA, ArgVarsB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = generic_call(CallDetails, ArgVarsA, _, _),
|
|
GoalExprB = generic_call(CallDetails, ArgVarsB, _, _),
|
|
equal_vars(ArgVarsA, ArgVarsB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = switch(Var, CanFail, CasesA),
|
|
GoalExprB = switch(Var, CanFail, CasesB),
|
|
equal_goals_cases(CasesA, CasesB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = unify(VarA, RHSA, _, _, _),
|
|
GoalExprB = unify(VarB, RHSB, _, _, _),
|
|
equal_var(VarA, VarB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_unification(RHSA, RHSB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = disj(GoalsA),
|
|
GoalExprB = disj(GoalsB),
|
|
equal_goals_list(GoalsA, GoalsB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = negation(SubGoalA),
|
|
GoalExprB = negation(SubGoalB),
|
|
equal_goals(SubGoalA, SubGoalB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = scope(ReasonA, SubGoalA),
|
|
GoalExprB = scope(ReasonB, SubGoalB),
|
|
equal_reason(ReasonA, ReasonB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals(SubGoalA, SubGoalB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = if_then_else(VarsA, CondA, ThenA, ElseA),
|
|
GoalExprB = if_then_else(VarsB, CondB, ThenB, ElseB),
|
|
equal_vars(VarsA, VarsB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals(CondA, CondB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals(ThenA, ThenB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals(ElseA, ElseB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = call_foreign_proc(Attributes, PredId, _,
|
|
ArgsA, ExtraA, MaybeTraceA, _),
|
|
GoalExprB = call_foreign_proc(Attributes, PredId, _,
|
|
ArgsB, ExtraB, MaybeTraceB, _),
|
|
% Foreign_procs with extra args and trace runtime conditions are
|
|
% compiler generated, and as such will not participate in assertions.
|
|
ExtraA = [],
|
|
ExtraB = [],
|
|
MaybeTraceA = no,
|
|
MaybeTraceB = no,
|
|
VarsA = list.map(foreign_arg_var, ArgsA),
|
|
VarsB = list.map(foreign_arg_var, ArgsB),
|
|
equal_vars(VarsA, VarsB, !Subst)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExprA = shorthand(ShortHandA),
|
|
GoalExprB = shorthand(ShortHandB),
|
|
equal_goals_shorthand(ShortHandA, ShortHandB, !Subst)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_reason(scope_reason::in, scope_reason::in, subst::in, subst::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_reason(exist_quant(VarsA), exist_quant(VarsB), !Subst) :-
|
|
equal_vars(VarsA, VarsB, !Subst).
|
|
equal_reason(barrier(Removable), barrier(Removable), !Subst).
|
|
equal_reason(commit(ForcePruning), commit(ForcePruning), !Subst).
|
|
equal_reason(from_ground_term(VarA, Kind), from_ground_term(VarB, Kind),
|
|
!Subst) :-
|
|
equal_var(VarA, VarB, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_goals_shorthand(shorthand_goal_expr::in, shorthand_goal_expr::in,
|
|
subst::in, subst::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_goals_shorthand(ShortHandA, ShortHandB, !Subst) :-
|
|
ShortHandA = bi_implication(LeftGoalA, RightGoalA),
|
|
ShortHandB = bi_implication(LeftGoalB, RightGoalB),
|
|
equal_goals(LeftGoalA, LeftGoalB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals(RightGoalA, RightGoalB, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_var(prog_var::in, prog_var::in, subst::in, subst::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_var(VA, VB, !Subst) :-
|
|
( map.search(!.Subst, VA, SubstVA) ->
|
|
SubstVA = VB
|
|
;
|
|
map.insert(!.Subst, VA, VB, !:Subst)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_vars(prog_vars::in, prog_vars::in, subst::in, subst::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_vars([], [], !Subst).
|
|
equal_vars([VA | VAs], [VB | VBs], !Subst) :-
|
|
equal_var(VA, VB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_vars(VAs, VBs, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_unification(unify_rhs::in, unify_rhs::in, subst::in, subst::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_unification(rhs_var(A), rhs_var(B), !Subst) :-
|
|
equal_vars([A], [B], !Subst).
|
|
equal_unification(rhs_functor(ConsId, E, VarsA), rhs_functor(ConsId, E, VarsB),
|
|
!Subst) :-
|
|
equal_vars(VarsA, VarsB, !Subst).
|
|
equal_unification(LambdaGoalA, LambdaGoalB, !Subst) :-
|
|
LambdaGoalA = rhs_lambda_goal(Purity, Groundness, PredOrFunc, EvalMethod,
|
|
NLVarsA, LVarsA, Modes, Det, GoalA),
|
|
LambdaGoalB = rhs_lambda_goal(Purity, Groundness, PredOrFunc, EvalMethod,
|
|
NLVarsB, LVarsB, Modes, Det, GoalB),
|
|
equal_vars(NLVarsA, NLVarsB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_vars(LVarsA, LVarsB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals(GoalA, GoalB, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_goals_list(hlds_goals::in, hlds_goals::in, subst::in, subst::out)
|
|
is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_goals_list([], [], !Subst).
|
|
equal_goals_list([GoalA | GoalAs], [GoalB | GoalBs], !Subst) :-
|
|
equal_goals(GoalA, GoalB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals_list(GoalAs, GoalBs, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
:- pred equal_goals_cases(list(case)::in, list(case)::in,
|
|
subst::in, subst::out) is semidet.
|
|
|
|
equal_goals_cases([], [], !Subst).
|
|
equal_goals_cases([CaseA | CaseAs], [CaseB | CaseBs], !Subst) :-
|
|
CaseA = case(MainConsIdA, OtherConsIdsA, GoalA),
|
|
CaseB = case(MainConsIdB, OtherConsIdsB, GoalB),
|
|
list.sort([MainConsIdA | OtherConsIdsA], SortedConsIds),
|
|
list.sort([MainConsIdB | OtherConsIdsB], SortedConsIds),
|
|
equal_goals(GoalA, GoalB, !Subst),
|
|
equal_goals_cases(CaseAs, CaseBs, !Subst).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
record_preds_used_in(Goal, AssertId, !Module) :-
|
|
% Explicit lambda expression needed since goal_calls_pred_id
|
|
% has multiple modes.
|
|
P = (pred(PredId::out) is nondet :- goal_calls_pred_id(Goal, PredId)),
|
|
solutions.solutions(P, PredIds),
|
|
list.foldl(update_pred_info(AssertId), PredIds, !Module).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
% update_pred_info(Id, A, !Module):
|
|
%
|
|
% Record in the pred_info pointed to by Id that that predicate
|
|
% is used in the assertion pointed to by A.
|
|
%
|
|
:- pred update_pred_info(assert_id::in, pred_id::in,
|
|
module_info::in, module_info::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
update_pred_info(AssertId, PredId, !Module) :-
|
|
module_info_pred_info(!.Module, PredId, PredInfo0),
|
|
pred_info_get_assertions(PredInfo0, Assertions0),
|
|
set.insert(Assertions0, AssertId, Assertions),
|
|
pred_info_set_assertions(Assertions, PredInfo0, PredInfo),
|
|
module_info_set_pred_info(PredId, PredInfo, !Module).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
normalise_goal(Goal0, Goal) :-
|
|
Goal0 = hlds_goal(GoalExpr0, GoalInfo),
|
|
normalise_goal_expr(GoalExpr0, GoalExpr),
|
|
Goal = hlds_goal(GoalExpr, GoalInfo).
|
|
|
|
:- pred normalise_goal_expr(hlds_goal_expr::in, hlds_goal_expr::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
normalise_goal_expr(GoalExpr0, GoalExpr) :-
|
|
(
|
|
( GoalExpr0 = plain_call(_, _, _, _, _, _)
|
|
; GoalExpr0 = generic_call(_, _, _, _)
|
|
; GoalExpr0 = unify(_, _, _, _, _)
|
|
; GoalExpr0 = call_foreign_proc(_, _, _, _, _, _, _)
|
|
),
|
|
GoalExpr = GoalExpr0
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = conj(ConjType, Goals0),
|
|
(
|
|
ConjType = plain_conj,
|
|
normalise_conj(Goals0, Goals)
|
|
;
|
|
ConjType = parallel_conj,
|
|
normalise_goals(Goals0, Goals)
|
|
),
|
|
GoalExpr = conj(ConjType, Goals)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = switch(Var, CanFail, Cases0),
|
|
normalise_cases(Cases0, Cases),
|
|
GoalExpr = switch(Var, CanFail, Cases)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = disj(Goals0),
|
|
normalise_goals(Goals0, Goals),
|
|
GoalExpr = disj(Goals)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = negation(SubGoal0),
|
|
normalise_goal(SubGoal0, SubGoal),
|
|
GoalExpr = negation(SubGoal)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = scope(Reason, SubGoal0),
|
|
normalise_goal(SubGoal0, SubGoal),
|
|
GoalExpr = scope(Reason, SubGoal)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = if_then_else(Vars, Cond0, Then0, Else0),
|
|
normalise_goal(Cond0, Cond),
|
|
normalise_goal(Then0, Then),
|
|
normalise_goal(Else0, Else),
|
|
GoalExpr = if_then_else(Vars, Cond, Then, Else)
|
|
;
|
|
GoalExpr0 = shorthand(ShortHand0),
|
|
(
|
|
ShortHand0 = atomic_goal(GoalType, Outer, Inner, Vars,
|
|
MainGoal0, OrElseAlternatives0, OrElseInners),
|
|
normalise_goal(MainGoal0, MainGoal),
|
|
normalise_goals(OrElseAlternatives0, OrElseAlternatives),
|
|
ShortHand = atomic_goal(GoalType, Outer, Inner, Vars, MainGoal,
|
|
OrElseAlternatives, OrElseInners)
|
|
;
|
|
ShortHand0 = try_goal(MaybeIO, ResultVar, SubGoal0),
|
|
normalise_goal(SubGoal0, SubGoal),
|
|
ShortHand = try_goal(MaybeIO, ResultVar, SubGoal)
|
|
;
|
|
ShortHand0 = bi_implication(LHS0, RHS0),
|
|
normalise_goal(LHS0, LHS),
|
|
normalise_goal(RHS0, RHS),
|
|
ShortHand = bi_implication(LHS, RHS)
|
|
),
|
|
GoalExpr = shorthand(ShortHand)
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- pred normalise_conj(hlds_goals::in, hlds_goals::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
normalise_conj([], []).
|
|
normalise_conj([Goal0 | Goals0], Goals) :-
|
|
goal_to_conj_list(Goal0, ConjGoals),
|
|
normalise_conj(Goals0, Goals1),
|
|
list.append(ConjGoals, Goals1, Goals).
|
|
|
|
:- pred normalise_cases(list(case)::in, list(case)::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
normalise_cases([], []).
|
|
normalise_cases([Case0 | Cases0], [Case | Cases]) :-
|
|
Case0 = case(MainConsId, OtherConsIds, Goal0),
|
|
normalise_goal(Goal0, Goal),
|
|
Case = case(MainConsId, OtherConsIds, Goal),
|
|
normalise_cases(Cases0, Cases).
|
|
|
|
:- pred normalise_goals(hlds_goals::in, hlds_goals::out) is det.
|
|
|
|
normalise_goals([], []).
|
|
normalise_goals([Goal0 | Goals0], [Goal | Goals]) :-
|
|
normalise_goal(Goal0, Goal),
|
|
normalise_goals(Goals0, Goals).
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|
|
|
|
:- func this_file = string.
|
|
|
|
this_file = "assertion.m".
|
|
|
|
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%
|